News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by purututu on Sunday February 05, 2023 @10:59AM (#34665887)
Where does NSA get the money from to hire thousands (=multiple 1000s) of big tech workers? How comes big tech is laying them off but NSA can afford to hiring them, in the thousands?
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by nirav72 on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:38AM (#34666259)
NSA is part of the DoD - the DoD's annual budget at this point is north of $700 billion. While NSA's exact slice of the overall DoD budget is classified - they're by far the largest intelligence agency in U.S government. Many times larger than even the CIA.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by kilgnad on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:02AM (#34665917)
Tax dollars. These jobs are safe from layoffs. It looks really bad when the government starts laying off people.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by nostrademons on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:09AM (#34665987)
Also borrowed dollars. The federal budget deficit is $1.38T in 2022, enough to fund 16 NSAs.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by willis936 on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:32AM (#34666193)
Snapshots are valueless. The deficit shot up to 3T in 2020, though I'm not really sure why (;. Then, in 2022 it was cut in half. It looks like we're on track to hit pre-Iraq War levels of deficit in another few years.

https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/natio...

Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by nostrademons on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:49AM (#34666391)
We haven't run a surplus since 2001, and I'd be very surprised if we continue to see the deficit decline. You can think of 2020/2021 as outliers because of all the pandemic spending assistance, and then taking them out, we're back on the same trendline since 2015, i.e. up. Likely will be even steeper if we get a recession later this year or next.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by tcoff91 on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:25AM (#34666125)
Its insane that NSA is 1/16 of federal budget. Thats way too much money to spend on merely one part of the defense budget.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by MattGaiser on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:26AM (#34666138)
Deficit, not budget.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by photonbeam on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:17AM (#34666062)
Are they safe from government shutdown brinkmanship
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by shadowgovt on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:23AM (#34666112)
Usually, government shutdown excludes security-critical programs.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by xhkkffbf on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:27AM (#34666140)
In the past, the government workers got unpaid time off. Then Congress quietly voted to reinstate all of lost pay so it turned into extra paid time off that didn't count toward the vacation allowance.

It's not guaranteed, but I would guess that Congress would do the same thing again.

Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by dpflan on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:03AM (#34665932)
Blurb in the article: "The NSA declined to say how much taxpayer money is allotted for the hiring effort. Total spending on the intelligence community for fiscal 2022 was $89.8 billion."
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by fogforthought93 on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:13AM (#34666035)
All kinds of source I'm sure—for example, the CIA has financed all sorts of black operations with drug trafficking since at least WWII. Now, that money would not be used to hire the rank and file, but it does relieve pressure on the budget.

Ransomware attacks come to mind. It wouldn't be hard to subcontract that out and keep even the hackers themselves from knowing who they're working for.

Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by flir on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:18AM (#34666074)
Much smaller scale, but I'm sure most of the VPN providers run at a profit.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by slavboj on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:02AM (#34665914)
It gets the money from you, and unlike MicroGoogBook, you are absolutely obliged to be their customer.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by lokar on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:06AM (#34665966)
They pay a fraction of big tech
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by dogma1138 on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:15AM (#34666048)
The gravy train isn’t running as well as it used too, and even during the glory days it’s not like every FAANG employee was on a half a mil+ total comp… and not ever tech worker worked for FAANG.

You can get a very decent salary with amazing benefits and job security working for the government, living in a far lower cost area than SF or Seattle and retire early on a very generous retirement plan.

Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by rhino369 on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:40AM (#34666284)
I’m not sure the DC is really much (if at all) cheaper than Seattle.

And GS salaries are bad. GS-15 tops out at like 160k at the most senior levels.

Maybe NSA puts them on a special track, but even that isn’t very good.

Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by Klonoar on Sunday February 05, 2023 @12:33PM (#34666754)
I’ve lived extensively in both Seattle and DC. DC works out to be cheaper at this point.

The GS salary, as you noted, is the bigger issue.

Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by mason55 on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:35AM (#34666212)
> living in a far lower cost area than SF or Seattle

If you're talking about DMV, it's not that different.

This random calculator has SF[1] as 15% more expensive and Seattle[2] as slightly less expensive

[1] https://www.forbes.com/advisor/mortgages/real-estate/cost-of...

[2] https://www.forbes.com/advisor/mortgages/real-estate/cost-of...

Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by loeg on Sunday February 05, 2023 @12:11PM (#34666571)
Ok but like 80-90% of FB engineers are E5s making ~300k+. That’s a lot more than an upper limit of 160-185k (sibling comments). And cost of living in Seattle is not substantially higher than DC.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by PragmaticPulp on Sunday February 05, 2023 @12:32PM (#34666745)
> That’s a lot more than an upper limit of 160-185k (sibling comments).

The GS upper limit is on base pay. Just as with FAANG, you'd have to look at bonus structures too.

It's definitely not the same as FAANG upper limits, but it's also going to be a more stable and steady-paced job that still pays more than the median developer salary.

There are a lot of burned out ex-FAANG employees out there who will gladly take a pay cut to work at a different pace. Not all of the FAANG jobs are like the "I only work 3 hours per day and make $300K per year" anecdotes that get posted here all the time.

Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by loeg on Sunday February 05, 2023 @12:45PM (#34666892)
I'd be keen to hear from anyone familiar with GS compensation about typical bonuses you might expect in any given year. I suspect it's a lot less than $100k.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by MattGaiser on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:03AM (#34665940)
Government budgets tend to be stable so I suspect they have always been hiring this many positions, but have had severe difficulties retaining talent with the lower salaries.
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by fnordpiglet on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:13AM (#34666032)
You
Re:NSA wooing thousands of laid-off Big Tech workers for spy... by JoeyBananas on Monday February 06, 2023 @10:15PM (#34688259)
1. congress 2. big tech has to actually make a profit