News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by isaacfrond on Thursday January 26, 2023 @03:37AM (#34529215)
Why does Chekhov make it HN frontpage so often?
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by azubinski on Thursday January 26, 2023 @04:38AM (#34529616)
Considering what russia is doing and how propaganda works, it’s not so interesting why there are so many Chekhov and Dostoevsky on a forum for "hackers". It's interesting that there is so little about ballet here :)
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by 082349872349872 on Thursday January 26, 2023 @05:25AM (#34529964)
ХН: первый в космосе; последний в балете ))

"HN is the first in space but last at the ballet"

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by nindalf on Thursday January 26, 2023 @07:44AM (#34530987)
Insane.

Is it possible that Chekhov and Dostoevsky were just really good writers? That maybe we liked them long before Putin started Putin-ing?

But no, everyone else apart from you is an easily led sheep and Putin or whoever else is the shepherd.

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by jevgeni on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:00AM (#34531661)
How many really good writers not from colonialist regimes are there? How often do they make to the front page of HN?
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by fancybouncy on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:14AM (#34531801)
writers not from colonialist regimes don't make it to HN because most of us never heard of them at school, which focuses on western writers. are you aware that most wealthy countries are or have been colonialist regimes? this includes much of Europe, North America, Japan and China.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by jevgeni on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:37AM (#34532078)
Exactly.

P.S. Also Russia, which is not really Europe.

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by konart on Thursday January 26, 2023 @10:47AM (#34533200)
Russia is (or at least was, during Grand Duchy of Moscow times) a part of Eastern Europe.

Now, its eastern\southern\northen parts\colonies - are not (except for the north and south -west of course)

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by slothtrop on Thursday January 26, 2023 @11:05AM (#34533503)
Writers of old usually came from aristocracy. So, few.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by somethingreen on Thursday January 26, 2023 @11:21AM (#34533768)
The argument is not that everyone who likes old russian writers is a shill. It's that people bringing them up at current time can't read a room at least, give in to their own imperialist tendencies probably and it only goes worse from there.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by dang on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:45PM (#34535404)
Please don't take HN threads into nationalistic flamewar. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34529215.

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by jevgeni on Friday January 27, 2023 @10:06AM (#34546823)
This is misguided neutrality, I think. At some point even HN would need to pick a side.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by iso1631 on Thursday January 26, 2023 @05:45AM (#34530104)
And you never see Sulu!
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by myth_drannon on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:16AM (#34531818)
And why Lex Fridman talks a lot about Dostoyevsky. Is he a Russian sleeper agent? No doubt Russia tries to promote it's culture everywhere. Openly or secretly(Youtube) or forcebly/violently. But same applies to China. Change my opinion but the "Three Body problem" success was 100% due to CPP secretly pushing it. Not to mention Dr.Zhivago and CIA campaign... Now that I think about it, maybe Dostoyevsky is pushed by CIA to create an image of Russian people as gloomy and dark.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by kombine on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:41AM (#34532123)
Fridman is a hypocrite who never found the courage to unequivocally condemn Russia's aggression. All he could utter was some bullshit about "love", "peace", "meaning of life" and so on. I am saying that as a Russian, by the way. I'm still happy to see Chekhov on the front pages - after the fall of Putin's regime we will need to rebuild our relationship with the world, and our literature still remains a lifeline.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by myth_drannon on Thursday January 26, 2023 @10:07AM (#34532524)
But that's his persona. He never really goes full on, always tries to maintain neutrality. In his interview with that rapper who was saying vile things he just kept talking about love.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by kombine on Thursday January 26, 2023 @11:27AM (#34533853)
Exactly, and maintaining neutrality in the face of absolute evil is immoral. Such neutrality justifies an equivalence between the aggressor and the victim and provides the evil with an advantage, because, suddenly, instead of punishment it will have to be dealt with in a civilised manner.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by somethingreen on Thursday January 26, 2023 @11:55AM (#34534384)
At the start of the big war Fridman went on podcasts as an expert on the conflict and all he did was re-translate russian talking points. He's way worse than hypocrite.

To be fair, he's not alone, a good half of IDW - group supposedly too intelligent and principled for mainstream media - turned out to be neither intelligent, nor principled, when those qualities got tested by real world events instead of social network drama.

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by kombine on Thursday January 26, 2023 @02:27PM (#34537371)
Tbh, I never understood the whole hype about IDW. Sam Harris is the only one worth respecting there, whereas Dave Rubin and Ben Shapiro are both absolutely disgusting.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by somethingreen on Thursday January 26, 2023 @04:46PM (#34539298)
I found most of them did have at least one interesting take or a perspective. Listening to people able to talk on serious topic for hours going deep into nuance was refreshing. And then there was Eric Weinstein, who could do that on seemingly endless array of topics and would casually drop gold after gold, before he got stuck on his DISC thing. But after "Ukraine is being brutalized. It is also corrupt." he is dead to me, of course.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by dang on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:44PM (#34535379)
Please don't take HN threads into nationalistic flamewar. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by kombine on Thursday January 26, 2023 @02:30PM (#34537425)
There is nothing nationalistic in my comment above.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by dang on Thursday January 26, 2023 @08:45PM (#34541465)
I see your point, but I'm using the word loosely to refer to internet flamewars about nations. One could also mention the site guideline about ideological battle. Either way, this kind of flamewar comment isn't what we're looking for here, not least because it tends to evoke worse than others (although it didn't do so in this particular case).

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by azubinski on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:48AM (#34532246)
Does he do it on the HN forum?
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by myth_drannon on Thursday January 26, 2023 @10:14AM (#34532629)
His audience are HN users. HN users are influenced by his and the guest's ideas and then promote them on HN.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by dang on Thursday January 26, 2023 @12:44PM (#34535374)
Please don't do this here.

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34529215.