News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by nindalf on Thursday January 26, 2023 @07:44AM (#34530987)
Insane.

Is it possible that Chekhov and Dostoevsky were just really good writers? That maybe we liked them long before Putin started Putin-ing?

But no, everyone else apart from you is an easily led sheep and Putin or whoever else is the shepherd.

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by jevgeni on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:00AM (#34531661)
How many really good writers not from colonialist regimes are there? How often do they make to the front page of HN?
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by fancybouncy on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:14AM (#34531801)
writers not from colonialist regimes don't make it to HN because most of us never heard of them at school, which focuses on western writers. are you aware that most wealthy countries are or have been colonialist regimes? this includes much of Europe, North America, Japan and China.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by jevgeni on Thursday January 26, 2023 @09:37AM (#34532078)
Exactly.

P.S. Also Russia, which is not really Europe.

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by konart on Thursday January 26, 2023 @10:47AM (#34533200)
Russia is (or at least was, during Grand Duchy of Moscow times) a part of Eastern Europe.

Now, its eastern\southern\northen parts\colonies - are not (except for the north and south -west of course)

Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by slothtrop on Thursday January 26, 2023 @11:05AM (#34533503)
Writers of old usually came from aristocracy. So, few.
Re:The Vast Humanity of Anton Chekhov by somethingreen on Thursday January 26, 2023 @11:21AM (#34533768)
The argument is not that everyone who likes old russian writers is a shill. It's that people bringing them up at current time can't read a room at least, give in to their own imperialist tendencies probably and it only goes worse from there.