Could you provide an example of what you're asking for? It appears to work well for me. I would estimate that 80% of the answers are very good, and 10% provide at least a glimpse of the information I was seeking.
Re:Google is freaking out about ChatGPT
by gmiller123456 on Sunday January 22, 2023 @01:37PM
(#34480656)
One of the first things I asked it to do was to "write a program to compute the rise and set times of a star". It got a couple of pieces right, but was way off the mark. I asked it a few other astronomy related questions, and it would try to use a library like Astropy, but make API calls that don't exist. I tried things like "don't use Astropy", and it would just switch to a different library.
It seems to do OK on things like the instructions for Fizz-Buzz.
Re:Google is freaking out about ChatGPT
by dpkirchner on Sunday January 22, 2023 @09:12AM
(#34477559)
I would guess they are less concerned about where ChatGPT is today than where it will be in 5 years.
Re:Google is freaking out about ChatGPT
by iLoveOncall on Sunday January 22, 2023 @09:16AM
(#34477597)
Even more convincing when it is wrong?
Re:Google is freaking out about ChatGPT
by jerjerjer on Sunday January 22, 2023 @10:48AM
(#34478495)
ChatGPT lacks the ability to prove that output is factually correct (which is an interesting but distinct problem). However, as long as the answer is derivative of supplied information, ChatGPT shines. Even today it can already:
- Write coherent short stories based on a prompt
- Be a personal diary/assistant
- Summarize and extract information from text.
There's a lot of applications for that.
Re:Google is freaking out about ChatGPT
by dpkirchner on Sunday January 22, 2023 @12:01PM
(#34479427)
It won't be wrong forever, there's a good chance they'll figure out how to evaluate sources and provide more useful results. And besides, the bar is low -- Google search results for some topics (e.g., programming related) are quite poor, filled with garbage and clone sites.
Re:Google is freaking out about ChatGPT
by iLoveOncall on Sunday January 22, 2023 @04:20PM
(#34482360)
I think people saying that just don't understand what GPT is. It's not a database of knowledge that sometimes invents stuff. It's a statistical model that ALWAYS invents stuff. It will never be able to evaluate sources, because it doesn't use sources.
isn't "evaluating sources" the exact problem of web search that Google has been throwing billions of dollars at for many years, with an equivalently dedicated and motivated horde of SEO specialists on the other side? How is chatgpt going to easily solve that overnight?
Every single time I have used ChatGPT (which isn't many), it gave me an absolutely unusable answer completely off the mark.
It's funny to see FAANG CEOs have FOMO over what is essentially smoke and mirrors.