News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by dvh on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:34AM (#34438398)
Nobody actually wants to eat artificial meat, but everybody want some other social group to eat it.

Meat eaters want vegans to eat this thing instead of soy meat.

Vegans wants meat eaters to eat this thing to prevent animal harm.

Rich people want poor people to eat this to save earth.

And poor people want rich people to eat this as a punishment.

Artificial meat is stupid idea.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by md_ on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:42AM (#34438447)
I don't follow. Why do meat eaters want vegans to eat this instead of soy meat?

I am mostly vegetarian, and I quite like Impossible Burgers. Sadly they're not really available in Europe.

They might be an idea with a small market. But in my mind this is a lot like if Silicon Valley got really pumped up about, like, unpasteurized cheeses or nutritional shakes. (Oh, wait, that last one happened.) The problem isn't with unpasteurized cheeses--there is a small but reasonable market for such things--but with Silicon Valley.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by gilgoomesh on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:23AM (#34438738)
There’s a prejudice against soy among US conservatives (meat eaters) for political reasons. I assume that’s what the parent comment meant.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by ZeroGravitas on Thursday January 19, 2023 @06:03AM (#34439015)
For more info on this weird belief:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soy_boy

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by euroderf on Friday January 20, 2023 @03:07AM (#34450336)
Impossible Burger is the stuff used at Burger King. At least in Finland. Or did you mean available at the supermarket ?
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by Nursie on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:39AM (#34438438)
> Nobody actually wants to eat artificial meat

I like it, I'm a meat eater with a vegetarian partner, it works great as a compromise for us.

Some vegetarians (my partner included) sometimes want food that tastes and has texture like dishes they used to eat as a meat eater. So it works great for them. For her it's bolognese-style pasta sauces, bacon, sandwich meats like pastrami and a few other things.

Artificial meat has a niche.

Was it going to change the whole world and revolutionise fucking everything? Well, no, that was overblown hype.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by gambiting on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:48AM (#34438476)
>>Nobody actually wants to eat artificial meat

Are you just projecting your own preference on others maybe? Both me and my wife are meat eaters and we happily get "meat-like" burger patties and sausages at least once a week - it makes for a nice break from having meat all the time, even though we both like meat. And the options nowadays are pretty good, so why not eat them?

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by charcircuit on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:17AM (#34438694)
No, he means that it never got PMF. Not that 0 people want to eat it. If it had PMF it wouldn't be called a flop.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by gambiting on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:17AM (#34438700)
What's PMF?

Also - "nobody" doesn't mean "most people don't". It literally means 0 people.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by charcircuit on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:23AM (#34438739)
PMF = product market fit

>It literally means 0 people.

Not everything is literal.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by planb on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:49AM (#34438483)
If artificial meat would taste like the real thing and cost less, everyone would want to eat it: Meat eaters and poor people because it costs less, vegans because it tastes good and does not harm anyone and rich people because they feel good when saving the earth.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by kashunstva on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:22AM (#34438730)
> Vegans wants meat eaters to eat this thing to prevent animal harm.

I’m a vegan of nearly 25 years. My reasons are my own. I don’t care what others eat. Eat a pig, a horse, a dog, cotton candy, pomegranate. To paraphrase Thomas Jefferson, it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. But I’m doubtful there are other vegans out there who want carnivores to switch to eating processed foods like this. For my family and most vegans I know, these artificial meats are useful primarily in social situations where vegans and omnivores gather.

I like the convenience of a protein substitute on the rare occasion that I eat outside my home and am sorry to see these businesses floundering. But if they went away tomorrow, I wouldn’t rue the failure of a grand conspiracy to force alternative food choices on the unsuspecting masses.

> stupid idea

Economically unsustainable, maybe, but stupid?

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by alexgrover on Thursday January 19, 2023 @11:13AM (#34441902)
There are in fact a lot of vegans who do want meat eaters to consume less meat, for the same ethical or environmental reasons we don’t eat meat ourselves. Doesn’t require being an activist to want these products to see more mainstream adoption.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by tomp on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:11AM (#34438642)
Given the choice between non-processed food (meat) and ultra—high-processed food (fake meat), the former is the much healthier option.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by kashunstva on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:26AM (#34438761)
Fortunately, though, the choice is not binary in that one could choose non-meat, non-processed foods, if one wanted.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by KaiserPro on Thursday January 19, 2023 @06:24AM (#34439159)
> non-processed food (meat) and ultra—high-processed food (fake meat), the former is the much healthier option.

I mean sure if you are comparing a chop from grass fed sheep from somewhere like wales (or good quality horse meat) to something like a vegan burger, then yeah.

but comparing a mystery meat burger to fake meat, no.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by xdennis on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:01AM (#34438566)
Even if fake meat tasted better and cost less, people would still eat meat too. I like chicken more than potatoes, yet I still eat potatoes.

Fake meat's best outcome would be for it to be enjoyed as much as meat, but it couldn't replace it. It would just be another thing to experience.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by Accacin on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:12AM (#34438653)
This. I'm not sure who expected that some "fake" meat came along and somehow everyone switched to it.

We're used to eating meat and most have been eating it their entire lives. It's unrealistic to think that most would switch in a few years.

Swapping to fake meats, even meat grown in a lab will probably takes decades at the minimum.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by yourusername on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:07AM (#34438608)
It's not the taste i have a problem with but the nutritional value. Most meat replacement products taste decent to me but they're high in fat (seed oils) and lower in protein than meat (and lower quality protein).
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by ptero on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:59AM (#34438548)
Like many startups it got hyped to make those exiting at the right time rich, but remove the hype and the product folds as cannot deliver (yet?) on such lofty expectations. Even if technology can be made to work eventually, it will struggle to overcome this feeling of a letdown. My 2c.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by Nursie on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:05AM (#34438594)
I think that’s the issue isn’t it, the sales aren’t living up the hype.

We’ll, no shit, it was sold as the answer to everything and it turns out that it’s just another addition to the food market with some appeal to some people.

I hope that it doesn’t disappear, basically because it make my life easier. But the takeaway from this should probably be along the lines of being skeptic all of the hype, always.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by noduerme on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:55AM (#34438522)
This is a hilarious comment and definitely worthy of being flagged for starting a flame war, but I'm totally behind the fact that you've laid bare these questions and opened them to debate.

My own response would be: Is it possible that if every version of schadenfreude and psychopathic antipathy toward other humans is deeply embedded in the fake-meat-making process and it still can be commercially successful and serve several purposes ethically/environmentally/economically if it's popularized, do the impure individual motives outweigh the greater good?

Because the poor will eat it if it's cheaper; the rich will eat it if it's more ethical or if it's dolled up more expensively; the outcomes touted by the environmentalists will be the same whether they do it out of love for cows or hatred for mankind, won't they?

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by watwut on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:59AM (#34438550)
Imo, rich people want poor people to eat this as a punishment too. There is literally no shortage of rich people actively against ecology in any form.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by birdyrooster on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:00AM (#34438554)
Impossible burger is good, idk what ur talking about.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by truetraveller on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:27AM (#34438774)
Very poetically stated. Have my upvote.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by imakeinternet on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:54AM (#34438953)
Im vegan. I eat "fake meat" products all the time. I get to enjoy everything I used to eat... without the meat. Personally, I really enjoy them.
Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by Lio on Thursday January 19, 2023 @06:01AM (#34439000)
Well much like a suspiciously cheap sausage, this opinion is clearly a load of old bollocks.

We often choose to eat meat substitutes. We like the texture and the taste.

Since the supermarkets in the UK are full of meat substitutes from the likes of Quorn, What The Cluck, etc. and have been for years, we can't be the only family of omnivores to enjoy it.

Meat alternatives don't have to 100% replicate meat to be enjoyable, they just have to be tasty.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by KaiserPro on Thursday January 19, 2023 @06:27AM (#34439169)
> this opinion is clearly a load of old bollocks.

aye, so I really like the fake kebab meat that's full of spice. I like it because unlike real kebab meat, its not going to give me TB, Scrapie or monstershits.

slap it in a microwave, dump it in a pita bread, add hot sauce, done. 4 mins tops.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by KaiserPro on Thursday January 19, 2023 @06:21AM (#34439138)
Mcdonalds have a vegan burger. its a shittonne better than its veggie burger and pretty much indistinguishable from its cheese burger.

The chicken burger is still superiors though.

However I'm not threatened by food, so if people want to eat it, I'm not going to slighted, I don't have enough energy to project politics into food.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by jeroenhd on Thursday January 19, 2023 @09:48AM (#34440843)
I want to eat artificial meat. Meat is tasty and many great dishes require something meat-like. In my experience artificial meat has only replaced the bottom-of-the-barrel burgers/sausages/chicken slabs, though. The expensive brands have nearly nailed down the texture of semi-processed beef, but the taste relies too much on "add salt until tasty".

That said, I've cooked myself some decent fast food with fake meat instead of cheap €1 burgers. The cheapest, shittiest meat is just a protein source drenched in fat, plants can easily substitute that.

If you're going vegetarian, fake meat isn't the way to go. There are great dishes built around vegetables, mushrooms, and all other kinds of non-meat products that you can eat instead. You won't ever find an artificial steak that's any good, but you may find something even better if you try exploring other meals instead.

I don't care what anyone else eats, as long as you let me know of your dietary restrictions if we're planning on eating together.

Re:Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just ... by pookha on Thursday January 19, 2023 @10:59AM (#34441710)
I don't see the point of eating meat unless you're willing to work on your bow skills and can hunt and clean an animal yourself. I like the discipline that it takes to be a vegitarian and I think the disconnect that the US public has with their food and where it comes from is weird. Everybody just lives with their heads up their asses while they eat pink-slime that came from chickens that lived their lives strapped down in a cage.

I do find it disturbing that Vegans are doing the same thing though. When I eat a heavily processed bleeding vegan burger I feel like I've been poisoned. Consuming industrial seed oil and Omega6 at the level seen in these vegan foods cannot be good.