Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by eps on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @06:33AM
(#34323256)
Even HN frontpage sometimes be "How I use Kawai Wasabi on Yakotori under Sashimi" and there'd be 100 comments, all of them serious. Makes one feel excluded.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by alexvoda on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @07:11AM
(#34323596)
Kawai Wasabi is incompatible with Yakotori. It is a known choice by the lead developer.
When using Yakotori you should use Tare instead.
Is Tare even maintained? I tried to build it with Mochi, but it gives weird error messages.
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by seniortaco on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @11:15AM
(#34327103)
Why would anyone still build it manually? Tokidoki automates all of that, and all you have to do configure your .toki bundles after you've installed the right SpaghettiWare layer for your architecture and connect it with either Tutti or Frutti. Easy peasy lemon squeezy! Oh that reminds me you do need Squeezy running in the background.
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by liotier on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @11:51AM
(#34327678)
Uh ? Aren't your .toki bundles autogenerated from picks in the CherryOrchard directory ? Don't touch them - let the NoodleBlossom pipeline trellis abstract that for you !
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by seniortaco on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:10PM
(#34331547)
Oh goodness, well I was just on a two week vacation and it looks like NoodleBlossom was created last week, I feel like some kind of cave person over here! Trellis pipelines are slick!
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by moffkalast on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @07:29AM
(#34323812)
Yeah but Tare doesn't scale as well as Marmot, plus it has Tenimoshi support.
I remember Yashi worked on this support, it is great.
I thought he was replaced by Mushi Mushi?
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by reportgunner on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @09:01AM
(#34324915)
Use the Babushka fork, it's still being maintained.
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by mindcrime on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @12:14PM
(#34328088)
Presumably by somebody in Mornington Crescent?
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by lo_zamoyski on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:40AM
(#34324685)
Would you please pass the jelly?
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by debugnik on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @02:46PM
(#34330460)
The JSON Encrypted Lightweight Long Yakisoba message?
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by DaedPsyker on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @07:20AM
(#34323689)
Tech naming has become a pet peeve of mine. Too many common nouns are being used.
Something like coffeescript is at least distinct but then you get a hundred things that will be called something like apple juice, based on some in-joke connected to a stack that will be called orchard.
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive
by Damogran6 on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @04:38PM
(#34331882)
Verbnouns - ActiveCrab, StormTorch, Plinth, Bonobo, ElasticStack, FrodoBlight
And at a conference, you'll have two animated people arguing over the use of...well...I didn't quite get it, it was loud, but it was the solution to all things and I'll never find out what it was, because what I _thought_ I heard was Spogdog, but Google's got NOTHING.
(If only I knew it was SpŌgDog)