News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Names should be cute, not descriptive. Parent comment

Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive by moffkalast on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @07:29AM (#34323812)
Yeah but Tare doesn't scale as well as Marmot, plus it has Tenimoshi support.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive by rapnie on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:18AM (#34324387)
I remember Yashi worked on this support, it is great.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive by progx on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:36AM (#34324636)
I thought he was replaced by Mushi Mushi?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive by reportgunner on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @09:01AM (#34324915)
Use the Babushka fork, it's still being maintained.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive by mindcrime on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @12:14PM (#34328088)
Presumably by somebody in Mornington Crescent?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive by lo_zamoyski on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:40AM (#34324685)
Would you please pass the jelly?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Names should be cute, not descriptive by debugnik on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @02:46PM (#34330460)
The JSON Encrypted Lightweight Long Yakisoba message?
[ Parent | on HN ]