News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by ProAm on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @01:28PM (#34070052)
WIth two massive scandals within 5 years I think this bank should be broken up as part of its punishment. It's clearly too big to run an honest consumer safe business.
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by michaelmrose on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @01:34PM (#34070151)
It's assets should be liquided. Shareholders should be given exactly nothing. Let people consider that when choosing who to do business with.
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by baobabKoodaa on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @01:44PM (#34070302)
> WIth two massive scandals...

Oh, honey

Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by twblalock on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @01:44PM (#34070308)
What about the 268,000 employees who work at Wells Fargo, 99% of whom had nothing to do with this?

Most of those employees are just normal people trying to make a living, and it would be wrong to screw them because their bosses, who they never met or had anything to do with, did something wrong.

Shutting down a company is the nuclear option -- it hurts many people who did nothing wrong, including most of the employees and the shareholders. It is not justice.

Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by theptip on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @01:49PM (#34070413)
Broken up != shut down.

Without advocating for/against the proposal, to clarify: typically this means either business units are spun out as smaller companies, or sold off to competitors. You’d expect some job losses due to consolidation but it’s not like you are closing down all of the branches and sending everyone working there home.

Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by twblalock on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @01:52PM (#34070464)
How exactly would you break up Wells Fargo into a subset of businesses that had a chance of surviving on their own?

This is especially bad for a bank. Customers would freak out and leave. I can't find a single historical example of a bank breakup that didn't result in the destruction of the entire business.

Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by kodyo on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @02:27PM (#34071093)
Customers freaking out and leaving would be awesome.
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by twblalock on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @02:46PM (#34071419)
Destruction of jobs and services != justice.
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by roywiggins on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @03:49PM (#34072317)
It's not that they deserve to lose their jobs. There were probably lots of honest people working at Theranos! That's not a good reason to have kept Theranos around, though.

Like, asbestos miners losing their jobs was a necessary result of shutting down the asbestos industry. It's not that it's fair, but it's not a reason to keep mining asbestos. Obviously ideally Wells Fargo could be reformed somehow, but the "corporate death penalty"[0] exists for a reason!

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_dissolution

Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by ProAm on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @04:55PM (#34073225)
> Destruction of jobs and services != justice.

But it does send a message to the broader industry. Sometimes a few rouge cancer cells can kill the entire host. And this is the second time around for them.

Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by kodyo on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @05:07PM (#34073388)
The availability of jobs should be a symptom of good business, not an end goal that justifies the ongoing depravity of a business.
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by ProAm on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @01:58PM (#34070572)
1) Breaking up does not mean shut down. They just need to be split into smaller pieces.

2) A vacuum provide ample opportunity for these people to start a new, honest bank as if there will be a need for it.

3) Sometimes evil just needs to be shutdown, Im sorry these people are working for a criminal organization, someone should have spoken up (Whistleblower money is huge for these types of things).

Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by pksebben on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @02:47PM (#34071432)
I'm more worried about their 70 million customers than the relatively paltry 300k employees
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by johnny_b_g on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @03:20PM (#34071914)
> "What about the 268,000 employees who work at Wells Fargo, 99% of whom had nothing to do with this?"

Boo-fukken-hoo. They were all part of the problem - the grease of the machinery if you will; something this bad doesn't go unnoticed by so many people. This was clearly an "inside job" with many, many people involved internally.

I would have no sympathy for any of them, even if they'd end up losing their own homes as a result (sweet, sweet irony that would be!)

Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by fabianhjr on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @01:57PM (#34070557)
What do you mean broken up?

It should be seized and either converted into a credit union (give ownership to the affected people) or a state run non-profit banking service. (And also implement the proposals for the postal service to offer banking services)

That would avoid both a lot of smaller wells fargos doing worse things and further financial damage to the economy, clients, and workers of splitting up a private company.

Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s... by twblalock on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @02:01PM (#34070647)
If people really think nationalization is a reasonable solution, I'd rather not punish banks at all.