Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s...
by kodyo on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @02:27PM
(#34071093)
Customers freaking out and leaving would be awesome.
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s...
by twblalock on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @02:46PM
(#34071419)
Destruction of jobs and services != justice.
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s...
by roywiggins on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @03:49PM
(#34072317)
It's not that they deserve to lose their jobs. There were probably lots of honest people working at Theranos! That's not a good reason to have kept Theranos around, though.
Like, asbestos miners losing their jobs was a necessary result of shutting down the asbestos industry. It's not that it's fair, but it's not a reason to keep mining asbestos. Obviously ideally Wells Fargo could be reformed somehow, but the "corporate death penalty"[0] exists for a reason!
Re:Wells Fargo to pay $3.7B settling charges it wrongfully s...
by ProAm on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @04:55PM
(#34073225)
> Destruction of jobs and services != justice.
But it does send a message to the broader industry. Sometimes a few rouge cancer cells can kill the entire host. And this is the second time around for them.
This is especially bad for a bank. Customers would freak out and leave. I can't find a single historical example of a bank breakup that didn't result in the destruction of the entire business.