News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by plusminusplus on Wednesday December 07, 2022 @04:39PM (#33900672)
>> Apple is positioning itself to become a major player in the advertising space

> We don’t know that

"Apple’s VP of advertising platforms Todd Teresi has been asked to bolster annual revenue into 'double digits' from about $4 billion today" (Aug 2022)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kateoflahertyuk/2022/08/15/appl...

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by helsinkiandrew on Wednesday December 07, 2022 @09:35PM (#33903397)
> Apple’s VP of advertising platforms Todd Teresi has been asked to bolster annual revenue into 'double digits' from about $4 billion today" (Aug 2022)

Double digits isn’t a major player. Google and FB are already making nearly 200B ad revenue each. If every Apple app and device showed ads constantly it still wouldn’t come close to the views that fb and web pages get to display ads used by Google and Facebook.

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by afavour on Wednesday December 07, 2022 @10:39PM (#33903873)
Right but it pretty obviously signals intent. Double digits leads to triple digits.
Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by aix1 on Thursday December 08, 2022 @12:44AM (#33904632)
> Double digits leads to triple digits.

Just to put everything onto the same scale, 4 to "double digits" requires a 2.5X increase. "Double digits to triple digits" would require a further 10X increase.

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by NBJack on Thursday December 08, 2022 @12:57AM (#33904700)
Basically take everything lost by Meta/Facebook directly attributed to ATT and you'll get a very clear picture on what they can very easily get back with their own ecosystem.
Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by the_other on Thursday December 08, 2022 @05:05AM (#33906247)
Or we decided we didn't want to be so rigorously surveilled and the market shrank.
Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by ClumsyPilot on Thursday December 08, 2022 @08:05AM (#33907444)
We, as the consumers, don't get to decide.

If Apple is indeed going full adtech and data harvesting, there is nowhere for consumer left to go, no competitor.

And regulators aren't stepping in either - multuple companies were caught illegally selling private customer data and there were no consequences.

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by illiac786 on Thursday December 08, 2022 @03:19PM (#33912769)
There are a lot of consequences for Facebook/meta for example. They have and will pay millions for transgressions.

But I would agree it is not sufficiently deterrent for a company this size.

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by voakbasda on Friday December 09, 2022 @07:57AM (#33920711)
Millions of fines against a billions in profit? This will do nothing to deter them. It’s an insignificant cost of doing business for them.
Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by lostlogin on Thursday December 08, 2022 @11:20AM (#33909640)
> If every Apple app and device showed ads constantly it still wouldn’t come close to the views that fb and web pages get to display ads used by Google and Facebook.

I can’t begin to imagine how irritated Tim Cooke is by the revenue Google and Facebook make from adverts on iOS and he clearly wants in on it.

Given that both those ad companies make revenue off iOS, it’s not unreasonable to aim for a similar level on the platform.

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by danaris on Thursday December 08, 2022 @02:18PM (#33911938)
> I can’t begin to imagine how irritated Tim Cooke is by the revenue Google and Facebook make from adverts on iOS and he clearly wants in on it.

Wow, thanks for using your psychic powers to tell us what Tim Cook thinks and feels and share that exclusively here on HN!

...Unless you have an actual source for this claim?

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by NBJack on Thursday December 08, 2022 @12:56AM (#33904692)
That's only the immediate goal. It would be bad for them to eat up the percentage of the market lost by their competition right away; that would get some unwanted attention regarding monopolistic behavior.

They clearly want a slice of that market, and they have the patience needed to wade in.