News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by aix1 on Thursday December 08, 2022 @12:44AM (#33904632)
> Double digits leads to triple digits.

Just to put everything onto the same scale, 4 to "double digits" requires a 2.5X increase. "Double digits to triple digits" would require a further 10X increase.

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by NBJack on Thursday December 08, 2022 @12:57AM (#33904700)
Basically take everything lost by Meta/Facebook directly attributed to ATT and you'll get a very clear picture on what they can very easily get back with their own ecosystem.
Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by the_other on Thursday December 08, 2022 @05:05AM (#33906247)
Or we decided we didn't want to be so rigorously surveilled and the market shrank.
Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by ClumsyPilot on Thursday December 08, 2022 @08:05AM (#33907444)
We, as the consumers, don't get to decide.

If Apple is indeed going full adtech and data harvesting, there is nowhere for consumer left to go, no competitor.

And regulators aren't stepping in either - multuple companies were caught illegally selling private customer data and there were no consequences.

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by illiac786 on Thursday December 08, 2022 @03:19PM (#33912769)
There are a lot of consequences for Facebook/meta for example. They have and will pay millions for transgressions.

But I would agree it is not sufficiently deterrent for a company this size.

Re:Apple introduces end-to-end encryption for backups by voakbasda on Friday December 09, 2022 @07:57AM (#33920711)
Millions of fines against a billions in profit? This will do nothing to deter them. It’s an insignificant cost of doing business for them.