News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by chrishare on Thursday October 27, 2022 @04:25PM (#33363534)
Devastatingly sad. Are plant-based meat replacements and lab-grown meat going to help fix this?
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by FredPret on Thursday October 27, 2022 @04:33PM (#33363643)
Devastatingly misleading, they excluded many kinds of mammal from their measurement.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @05:19PM (#33364191)
One day, whilst eating a burger in a pub and thinking about the food chain, I ran a thought experiment in my head. I imagined being hungry and someone offering me a choice between a ham sandwich or a vegan sandwich. I could only select the ham sandwich if I was willing to shoot a pig in the head. I wouldn’t have to butcher the pig or anything else, just be responsible for its death. I decided that I would choose the vegan sandwich. This lead me to believe that by continuing to eat meat I was shirking responsibility and passing the pain of killing an animal on to someone else so I decided to go vegan. The environmental benefits were secondary and I was under no illusions as regards to health; I believed (and still do) that it is worse for you than both vegetarian and meat containing diets.

It was around 2016-2017 and I lived in a small town in northern England. Veganism was only just starting to make it into the mainstream; there weren’t any vegan options at any of the fast food places and there was about one freezer worth of vegan alternatives if you went to a large supermarket. I found transitioning over to a meat free diet surprisingly easy. The hardest thing about it wasn’t cravings for foods you couldn’t eat like you might expect. The hardest thing was the social aspect of it.

I slowly found myself being pushed out of social circles. People knew you were vegan so there was no going for a burger or a KFC or any other bonding activities over food. People would cook Linda McCartney sausages if you brought them round to a BBQ but you could tell they didn’t appreciate the extra fuss.

I tried really hard not to be the loud, shouty, fussy vegan but as soon as anyone found out the questions would start. People were curious about why I was vegan and I would tell them. The vast majority of people admitted to feeling bad about eating animals. They didn’t want to think about where their food was coming from and I was a living symbol in front of them that they could stop doing that if they really wanted to. Eating was celebration after hard work and, just with my presence, I was ruining that for them.

At the time I was heavily into fitness and I noticed that achieving my protein intake was really difficult. It would require having 3 to 4 protein shakes a day or doing lots of cooking and prep. All the natural vegan protein sources outside of protein shakes weren’t lean; they also contained lots of carbs or fats. This made hitting macros hard. Food became a chore and I didn’t feel particularly healthy. If anything I felt my health declining.

I went for a walk one day and ran the thought experiment again. I decided that yes, this time I would take responsibility and kill the pig. And that was that. At the end of my walk I went into a Subway, ordered a meatball sub and went home to eat it. I expected to have gastrointestinal distress having not eaten meat for so long but there was nothing. My body went right back to processing it as if I’d never stopped.

The one thing that this whole experience taught me is that food is tied deeply into culture and bonding. I very strongly believe that plant based sources are not going to be the solution to this problem. There is just too much social resistance to overcome.

From my experience, the only way of solving this problem is petri dish meat. Not plant based, but actual meat tissue, grown in factories. Why? People will still get the joy of eating meat and maintain their traditions without the guilt. It also has the potential to actually be better and cheaper than regular meat. If scientists can perfect the processes, they can make it taste like prime beef every time but with a fraction of the economic and environmental costs. It can be sold as an upgrade not a downgrade which is what people see veganism as.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by Arnavion on Thursday October 27, 2022 @05:37PM (#33364377)
>It would require having 3 to 4 protein shakes a day or doing lots of cooking and prep. All the natural vegan protein sources outside of protein shakes weren’t lean; they also contained lots of carbs or fats. This made hitting macros hard.

A large number of Indian people are vegetarian (plants + poultry eggs + cow/goat milk), and I've never heard of them having such problems. Why? I certainly didn't have any dietary or nutritional problems when I grew up as a vegetarian there.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by SaddledBounding on Thursday October 27, 2022 @06:12PM (#33364727)
It's because the grandparent comment has misconceptions about nutrition, including that animal products are necessary for a healthful diet and how much protein is required for a healthful diet.

The first misconception is contradicted by extensive analysis by health organizations such as [Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics][1]. Healthful vegan diets are no less healthful than healthful non-vegan diets.

The second misconception is about how much protein is needed in a healthful diet. Many people wildly overestimate how much protein a person needs, especially when strength training. It is not difficult to get sufficient protein within a given calorie budget while on a vegan diet, even without using protein supplements. For instance, tofu and seitan have protein to calorie ratios similar to meat, with seitan often having a higher protein to calorie ratio than most meats.

[1]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27886704/

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @06:27PM (#33364836)
Go and have a look at the amino acid profiles of seitan and tofu and also their bioavailability in comparison to meat and vegetarian protein sources. And you can talk all you want about people overestimating protein macro but 1 to 2 grams per lb of bodyweight has consistently shown to be optimal. You’ll be hard pressed to find any high performing athlete who isn’t aiming for that outside of endurance sports.

At the end of the day in my experience, a vegan diet is both a lot more hard work and less healthy than a non vegan one. Saying that a vegan diet isn’t any less healthy than a meat eating or vegetarian one is an absolute joke, especially considering there are no vegan foods containing vitamin B12 outside of yeast flakes and artificial supplements.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by jablala on Thursday October 27, 2022 @07:54PM (#33365667)
Amino acids - it's suboptimal to eat only one source of protein. I suppose more so on for a vegan. Just as well no one does that. Of they do you're no longer attributing "poor amino acid profiles" to veganism as you are to the person responsible for terrible diet.

B12 - Animal products come from animals filled to the brim with B12 supplements, of which a huge majority of global B12 supplements go towards livestock. Also along with over lovely concoctions of antibiotics and drugs.

There's nothing wrong with cutting out the middle-man! Not least when so many flesh eaters are also deficient in B12 themselves. In need of taking the same B-complex as vegans.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by heavyset_go on Thursday October 27, 2022 @06:17PM (#33364778)
If you're body building or doing serious exercise, it can be hard to get the protein your body needs to recover and build muscle on a strictly vegan diet. I've tried it and it's difficult.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by Arnavion on Thursday October 27, 2022 @06:30PM (#33364869)
You've simply restated rcarr's point without answering my question.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by CHB0403085482 on Thursday October 27, 2022 @07:29PM (#33365462)
How does beans, egg, milk compare to animal meat protein?

https://www.mondaycampaigns.org/meatless-monday

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by heavyset_go on Thursday October 27, 2022 @07:35PM (#33365508)
Eggs and milk aren't vegan
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by myshpa on Thursday October 27, 2022 @08:46PM (#33366084)
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by heavyset_go on Thursday October 27, 2022 @09:05PM (#33366219)
> Since I bet you don't want to only eat beans, you'll probably want to take a pea protein supplement to replace the whey supplement. These cost about the same, but vary depending on location. Also, a vegan diet will be higher in carbs and lower in fat, unless you supplement with a lot of protein powder and eat a lot of nuts.

Your own source admits that it is difficult to get enough protein in a vegan diet without supplementation. I'm on a medication that increases my insulin response, and I can't eat 400+ grams of carbohydrates a day just to get ~100 grams of protein without both getting fat and putting myself at risk of pre-diabetes.

> https://www.theveganlink.com/resources/30-vegan-recipes-for-...

Many of these are just carbohydrates. One of the recipes is literally just overnight oats, others are full of bread, grains and other carbohydrates with little to no protein at all.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @09:53PM (#33366576)
It is absolutely amazing to me that I can go vegan for an entire year and heavyset_go can also try being vegan and you and the rest of the vegan brigade want to now lecture us with vegan subreddits and recipe blogs. I am absolutely aware of what the vegan protein sources are as I am sure, given their username, heavyset_go is. It is this kind of militant mentality which is why so many people roll their eyes whenever the term vegan gets mentioned.

Neither of us are disputing that it is possible to be a vegan bodybuilder. But it is significantly more difficult and extra work compared to being either a meat eater or a vegetarian and to try and claim otherwise does not chime with our experiences or those of others I have encountered. The protein sources are inferior in density, amino acid profile and bioavailability, prep time is longer, more cooking is involved, meals can easily get monotonous and your social life is strained. It is hard work on top of already gruelling work in the gym. I will not be going back.

I can also say without a shadow of a doubt that several of the bodybuilders on that PETA page are using steroids which completely changes the game. Studies have shown that a steroid user doing no training puts on more muscle than a natural bodybuilder training as hard as they can.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by myshpa on Friday October 28, 2022 @04:44AM (#33369076)
> It is this kind of militant mentality which is why so many people roll their eyes

But, you know, you're the one who selected a lifestyle where you value your muscles above life of innocent beings, above the future of the nature and cause immense suffering with every meal you take.

You're killing innocent beings. Not just the ones you consume, you're also the reason why wildlife is dissapearing.

> The protein sources are inferior in density, amino acid profile and bioavailability, prep time is longer, more cooking is involved, meals can easily get monotonous and your social life is strained.

When somebody points out that you don't have to do that, you counter argue that it's inconvenient to prepare vegan meal? As if your convenience was somehow relevant.

> It is hard work on top of already gruelling work in the gym.

I bet you look awesome.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Friday October 28, 2022 @05:55AM (#33369499)
> But, you know, you're the one who selected a lifestyle where you value your muscles above life of innocent beings,

No I valued a lifestyle where I felt healthier and could perform at a higher level outside of the gym. But performing at that level requires me to train hard in the gym otherwise I am prone to bouts of depression.

> You're killing innocent beings.

So are you going to act like the food chain doesn’t exist anymore and all animals are innocent beings who don’t eat other animals. That’s some Disney Princess shit.

> Not just the ones you consume, you're also the reason why wildlife is disappearing.

Ok but you can’t label all of this at the door of omnivores.

Presumably you are typing this on a device which mined the earth for rare minerals so I hope you are willing to give that device up. And if you have any kind of vehicle other than a bicycle I hope you’re willing to give that up too. When you get sick, I hope you are willing to eschew medicine as it has almost certainly been tested on animals (most likely mice) at some point before making it to market.

Every time new construction is undertaken habitats are destroyed. So I hope you are ok sleeping in a tent and not a house or do you just want the rest of the growing population to sleep rough whilst you are excluded from having to make this particular sacrifice? You’re also guilty of killing animals unless you’re living in a hut wearing home spun robes. It’s just more abstract for you so you can delude yourself into thinking you’re one of the holy ones.

> When somebody points out that you don't have to do that, you counter argue that it's inconvenient to prepare vegan meal? As if your convenience was somehow relevant

First you’ve cherry picked the sentence and disregarded the rest. And yes, my convenience (and everyone else’s) is relevant. Humans are wired to conserve energy. I am not going to waste my energy unnecessarily if there are more convenient options available. Presumably you do the same or are you still taking your clothes down to the river to scrub them rather than using the washing machine?

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by myshpa on Friday October 28, 2022 @06:45AM (#33369751)
> otherwise I am prone to bouts of depression

It sounds you're just suppresing your depression. Maybe you should direct your efforts to solving the problems causing you depression. It will catch you sooner or later, you know.

> like the food chain doesn’t exist anymore

We're at the top of the food chain, destroying everything below us. And we're no longer part of the nature, we're above it. If you feel you're like a lion, why don't you lick your balls and eat your young?

> Presumably you are typing this on a device ...

Nobody argues we should go back to the stone age. It's not possible and not practical. Eating plant-based is, and it solves a lot of current problems (co2, methane, biodiversity loss, droughts, needless suffering, ...).

> Every time new construction ...

Urban and built-up land is 1.5 mil km2, land for animal agriculture is 40 mil. km2 ( https://ourworldindata.org/land-use ).

> First you’ve cherry picked the sentence and disregarded the rest

I found there nothing of value to comment on, sorry.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Friday October 28, 2022 @07:14AM (#33369928)
> It sounds you're just suppresing your depression. Maybe you should direct your efforts to solving the problems causing you depression. It will catch you sooner or later, you know.

Your arrogance is truly astounding. Not only do you know what’s best for my diet and lifestyle apparently you know what’s best for my mental health as well. I’m going to go eat a burger today just because of your attitude. Good luck with your crusade.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by myshpa on Friday October 28, 2022 @08:40AM (#33370627)
> It sounds ... maybe ...

I don't know what's good for you, and don't pretend to know, I'm just speaking from my own experience.

About plant-based diet, I'm just able to comprehend and accept the facts and modify my own behaviour where needed.

> I’m going to go eat a burger today just because of your attitude

No, you're going to eat it because you value the taste and your own convenience above everything else.

> Good luck with your crusade.

Good luck with your gym buddies, hope they'll appreciate the gains.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Friday October 28, 2022 @09:37AM (#33371235)
You literally don’t give one fuck about getting people to reduce their meat intake. All you care about is that you get to maintain the pedestal of holiness you sit upon in your own head. Your entire comment history is just you arguing with people about why everyone should be vegan. You’re a sad individual.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by myshpa on Friday October 28, 2022 @10:49AM (#33372027)
It's a pedestal of sadness and desperation, not holiness. You're wrong again.

You know, it's a viewpoint that's been desperately ignored in HN comment threads in recent years, that's why I decided to start commenting on it after almost 10 years of lurking.

I may make some people very angry, to the point of personal attacks. That's fine.

If you plant a seed, it may grow. We'll see. Better than doing nothing and watching the world burn.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @07:05PM (#33365221)
Vegetarian is easier than vegan but still more difficult if you want to be lean E.g sub 15% or at the more extreme end 10% body fat. You can separate yolks and white to get lean protein from eggs. And with milk you can get skimmed milk to avoid the fat (but milk is still absolutely loaded with carbohydrates so some people argue that it is actually more beneficial to drink full fat or semi milk to buffer the carb dump somewhat.

The other thing to consider is amino acid profile. Milk and eggs have a full amino acid profile but vegan sources are normally incomplete. This means to get all the protein your body needs you have to consume multiple protein sources. And bioavailability: just because you consume 1g of protein doesn’t mean your body can necessarily use that entire gram. Vegan proteins tend to have the lowest bioavailability, often in the 0.7 to 0.8 range meaning you have to consume more of them for the same result. Which is problematic as it means you’re now consuming more carbs and fats knocking your macros further out of whack.

It is doable, it is just very hard work. Here is a vegan bodybuilder with 13.7% body fat percentage after 4 years.

https://www.menshealth.com/nutrition/a33807797/bodybuilder-v...

The other thing complicating matters nowadays is steroids, SARMS and TRT. If people are on them it makes life significantly easier: there were studies done that showed people on steroids doing absolutely nothing (no workouts whatsoever) still built more muscle than people who were natural (no steroids) doing hours of hard bodybuilding gym workouts. They are absolutely rampant, far more than people realise. For what it’s worth looking at this guy, I don’t think he’s doing roids. His physique is achievable without them. But I might be wrong.

Also, heart disease is absolutely rampant in India. So not the best country to be using as an example.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rafaelero on Thursday October 27, 2022 @07:31PM (#33365474)
Most people don't care about being body builders, so I am not sure why you are getting into this topic. Every reputable nutritional organization says vegetarian / vegan diet is ok and on top of that the longest living populations are mostly eating plant-based diet, suggesting they are not only nutritionally appropriate, but also desirable in order to maintain body function over time.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @07:45PM (#33365600)
> Every reputable nutritional organization says vegetarian / vegan diet is ok

Ok yes, optimal no. You cant say a diet (vegan) that requires artificial produced supplementation (vitamin b12) in order for you to survive is the optimal diet for humans. It just doesn’t make any sense. If our ancestors ate vegan diets before we had mastered science we literally would not be alive having this conversation because they would have all perished of anaemia.

> on top of that the longest living populations are mostly eating plant-based diet.

The longest living populations are eating diets that are heavy on plants yes, but not vegetarian or vegan. If anything, the blue zones have a higher proportion of fish intake than elsewhere.

And I went off on the bodybuilder tangent because the original commenter specifically asked about a line in my story which was to do with me hitting my macros and trying to find lean protein sources in order to do that. At the time, I was doing bodybuilding and CrossFit so it was relevant to the question asked.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rafaelero on Thursday October 27, 2022 @08:00PM (#33365721)
> You cant say a diet (vegan) that requires artificial produced supplementation (vitamin b12) in order for you to survive is the optimal diet for humans.

You know animals don't produce B12 as well, right? They come from bacteria in the soil.

> The longest living populations are eating diets that are heavy on plants yes, but not vegetarian or vegan.

Take a look at the Seven-day Adventist study (the population with the highest longevity ever recorded). Between this group, the ones excluding all animal products from the diet actually live longer than the rest.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @08:39PM (#33366042)
> You know animals don't produce B12 as well, right? They come from bacteria in the soil.

Good luck with your soil recipes.

> Take a look at the Seven-day Adventist study (the population with the highest longevity ever recorded). Between this group, the ones excluding all animal products from the diet actually live longer than the rest.

Not true. Pesco-vegetarians had a lower death rate.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4191896/

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by myshpa on Thursday October 27, 2022 @08:56PM (#33366152)
> Good luck with your soil recipes.

Farm animals eat tons of added B12 in their feed.

Grazing animals get their B12 from dirt, because they don't wash their greens.

If you purchase B12 fortified vegan foods, you don't have to eat supplements.

When you wash your salads and don't eat fortified foods, then you should eat B12 supplements ... there are vegan B12 supplements from algae on the market.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rafaelero on Thursday October 27, 2022 @09:14PM (#33366290)
> Good luck with your soil recipes.

Wtf.

> Not true. Pesco-vegetarians had a lower death rate.

They are not statistically distinguishable.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @09:41PM (#33366488)
If they’re not “statistically distinguishable” why are you trying to claim the vegans have higher longevity?
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rafaelero on Thursday October 27, 2022 @10:37PM (#33366916)
Because between non-meat eaters and meat eaters there's a statistically significant reduction, while between vegans and fish-eaters there isn't?
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @10:50PM (#33367012)
So I stated:

> The longest living populations are eating diets that are heavy on plants yes, but not vegetarian or vegan.

The people longest living at the adventist church are pesco-vegetarians which are not vegetarians as far as I’m concerned. Also as far as I’m aware, there is no significant difference between the Adventist church goers in terms of life expectancy and the other blue zones, which are also consuming small to moderate amounts of meat, dairy, fish and alcohol.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rafaelero on Thursday October 27, 2022 @11:11PM (#33367191)
Again, there is no statistically significant difference between fish-eaters and vegetarians.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Friday October 28, 2022 @05:58AM (#33369517)
You’re cherry picking data to suit your argument is what you’re doing.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rafaelero on Saturday October 29, 2022 @04:29PM (#33387677)
What a ridiculous comment. I made a very simple remark over statistical significance and I am cherry picking?? Enough of Internet for today.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by hombre_fatal on Thursday October 27, 2022 @08:44PM (#33366067)
I don’t grant your claim that a diet isn’t optimal just because it includes a b12 pill. In fact that it’s so trivial to supplement makes me wonder why you take for granted that there’s some magical bonus from incidentally getting it from a non-supplement.

It’s like saying getting vitamin D fortified milk is superior to taking the fortification yourself.

I bet this cashes out into the appeal to fallacy. Frankly I see no reason why the optimal human diet can’t be some undiscovered 100% artificial diet that we can synthesize from scratch. To say otherwise, including your b12 belief, leads to some pretty hilarious reductios.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by jablala on Thursday October 27, 2022 @07:55PM (#33365679)
I think resentment is the word we're all looking for.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by dqv on Thursday October 27, 2022 @06:19PM (#33364784)
>There is just too much social resistance to overcome.

We're really only on the second wave of veganism right now. I can't say exactly when the first wave "ended", but I'd say the second wave started to roll in after 2010. But in this second wave, there is a lot of culture being developed that I believe will sustain a third wave. Whereas the first wave had a bunch of early adopters who had very odd food habits (i.e. eating barely palatable food or eating 50 bananas a day), this second wave is developing new food culture. There are large communities like the Vegan Soul Food Group. Groups like this share recipes and tips for making vegan food and, frankly, it's damn good. Not everything is the best nutritionally, but that's not why everyone is adopting veganism in the first place. There are also high profile chefs (and burgeoning chefs too) who are coming on the scene. Gaz Oakley, Yeung Man, Andrew Bernard, Vegan Bunny Chef. There are all sorts of accounts on tiktok with culturally-specific vegan foods - Mexican, Indian, Korean, Japanese, Chinese, Ghanaian. Not to mention all of the "accidentally vegan" foods that already existed before.

These people are leading the way to a vibrant vegan food culture. They're developing new traditions and practices right before our very eyes. And a lot of people are joining in as a result. The younger generation is much less obsessed with this sort of "tradition perfectionism" where every element has to be there to make it a tradition. They were much more willing to change and adapt traditions to fit their own personal and moral beliefs.

The third wave, I think, is going to come as a result of what you're talking about. We have some great things like nut-based cheese, but also on the horizon (beyond meat ;) are things like vegan casein and whey, which will make it even easier to be vegan. At that point, the third wave will be as if people were never vegan in the first place.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @06:46PM (#33365029)
I honestly think this is going to have the opposite effect of what you think it will. People outside of metropolitan areas are sick to death of “new traditions and practices” and “high profile” names. They see it as another bourgeoisie vs proletariat battleground.

They do not want “new food culture” they want the existing culture but more environmentally friendly. You aren’t going to pry the burgers out of their hands no matter how good your beyond burger is. But if you make a petri dish burger that tastes better than a dead cow you might stand a chance of them getting behind it.

You can say the younger generation doesn’t care about old traditions but people have been saying this throughout time. Young people have a habit of growing old and more conservative when they gain more life experience and realise that the traditions they rallied against in the youth were actually developed for a good reason.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by myshpa on Thursday October 27, 2022 @08:33PM (#33365995)
You need only few % of the population protesting in the streets (less than 5% imho) to topple an authoritarian regime.

I suppose with sufficient vegan base the political will to remove (huge) subsidies for meat/dairy industry will materialize.

It simply doesn't make sense that meat burger/milk is cheaper than plant-based burger/milk now.

You need 100x more land to produce same amount of calories (beef vs. peas). Removing subsidies will drive prices of meat/dairy up, and plant based food prices will go down (as seen now with increasing competition and growing vegan movement).

With higher prices of meat/dairy many more people will switch.

As things are now, we need to remove subsidies for all unsustainable stuff, meat/dairy/oil/plastics/agri poisons ... we can't pretend forever that (negative) externalities don't exist.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Thursday October 27, 2022 @10:02PM (#33366661)
> You need only few % of the population protesting in the streets (less than 5% imho) to topple an authoritarian regime.

I know who my money would be on if vegans decide they want to try and overthrow the country.

> we can't pretend forever that (negative) externalities don't exist.

I agree but like I said, I think petri dish meat is the answer which would most likely be even less resource intensive than plant based alternatives when perfected. You only use the exact resources you need for each Petri dish and you can literally build a meat factory for every city. Next to zero transport emissions.

There is a good reason why those farming subsidies exist. It does not end well when people are hungry en masse.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by myshpa on Friday October 28, 2022 @04:48AM (#33369106)
We don't have time to wait until lab based proteins exists, it may take decades until we have the technology and until it spreads through whole world.

If we'll succeed in making them, it may take decades. Like finding the bugs to eat the plastics. That also takes forever.

And meanwhile the show goes on ... and on ...

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Friday October 28, 2022 @06:04AM (#33369552)
Ok well good luck fighting in the civil war that’s about to break out in whatever country you try to enforce your strict no animal products policy. My money is on the people who don’t mind killing things to win.

Obviously all the death will significantly reduce the population so that’s one way of temporarily solving the problem. Although the loss of brain power might set back finding the actual solutions that we’ve already mentioned so swings and roundabouts.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by asdff on Friday October 28, 2022 @01:22AM (#33367985)
People act like it will be easy to remove the huge subsidies from these bad industries, but imo the fact that these subsidies are so huge and so ridiculous from anyone from the outset to see is proof that they are not going anywhere. These lobbies are seriously entrenched and probably as powerful as they come.

Plus there is more that a cow is used for than just ground beef. 99% of the cow is used for things. You'd have to bring a capable alternative to market for each and every part of the cow that currently sees a use if you want to end pasturalism, and right now even coming up with an alternative to the most common use people think of when it comes to a cow is hard enough.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Friday October 28, 2022 @06:06AM (#33369559)
> these subsidies are so huge and so ridiculous

They are huge, they are not ridiculous. They literally stop wars breaking out.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by therealdrag0 on Thursday October 27, 2022 @11:08PM (#33367163)
2 short thoughts.

1. Just eating less meat would go along way without the social awkwardness. Have a burger with friends once a week who cares. But reduce otherwise.

2. I’ve been drinking huel and it has good nutrients and lots of protein. Might be easier to be vegan without feeling like trash these days.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Friday October 28, 2022 @05:34AM (#33369383)
These are both good points.

1. This is something I would consider unlike the ridiculous points above some of the absolute militant vegans are trying to make. If I was going to do something again it would be more like this rather than strict veganism.

2. Huel is great. I drank it a lot at the time and still drink it today. It’s pricey though.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by asdff on Friday October 28, 2022 @01:11AM (#33367910)
Thinking about something getting shot in the head isn't too helpful, because you could realistically run a similar moral exercise on just about every thing you encounter in modern life, and find that somewhere, something along the line from raw material to finished product is getting either literally or proverbially shot in the head.
Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by rcarr on Friday October 28, 2022 @06:16AM (#33369603)
Yes, the killing is being done everywhere throughout modern life just at different levels of distance removed from the killing. I believe the thought experiment to be relevant in this case as there is a more direct chain between the death of the animal and my consumption of the end product. It provided me with insight as well as the year long experiment.

I think it’s a brilliant thought experiment as (providing you’re not completely desensitised) it makes you sit and think whether you truly want something or if there are alternatives out there you’d be happy with it. And it forces you to take personal responsibility for the consequences of the things you do want.

Re:Humans and our livestock account for 96% of all mammal bi... by asdff on Wednesday November 09, 2022 @12:26PM (#33534872)
There couldn't be less of a direct chain of death between you and the animal. If you don't order that steak its still in the inventory of the restaurant. If you don't buy it at the store its still at the store. If demand actually drops like a stone, I wouldn't be surprised if cows were still killed hand over fist and their bodies turned into mere fertilizer, because a well developed industry is not just going to willingly cease to exist overnight. Once the industry exists and is politically entrenched consumer action can do little to remove it. Take corn for example. We produce so much corn that a huge portion of the crop is converted to ethanol for lack of a better use, and farmers still grow this corn knowing its not going to do much good or feeding that many people, because the industry is entrenched and protected by strong subsidies and costs are high to convert to some unknown industry. We produce so much milk that rather than scale back production when we overproduce for demand, we just dump it into the drain.

If you want to enact the change you expect to enact by going vegetarian, then move to a district with a slaughterhouse and show up to local government meetings every day to raise hell until such land use is made illegal in this jurisdiction. If you rely on consumer demand alone, industry will just find either nonconsumer demand or will use its ability to strongly influence government to keep it in existence in perpetuity.