Re:Study: Time-Restricted Eating Improves Cardiovascular Hea...
by stubish on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @03:55AM
(#33092558)
No, all your eating happens in that 10 hour window. You fast for at least 14 hours per day. Easy enough if you eat an early dinner and don't snack after.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Study: Time-Restricted Eating Improves Cardiovascular Hea...
by k__ on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @08:21AM
(#33094473)
Is the position of that window relevant?
So, I sleep 9h, which means, I'm awake 15h.
If I don't eat 2,5h before and after sleeping, would this be enough?
Re:Study: Time-Restricted Eating Improves Cardiovascular Hea...
by stubish on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @09:59PM
(#33103444)
> If I don't eat 2,5h before and after sleeping, would this be enough?
Some researchers think so, yes. I don't think anyone knows what is optimal. Research is ongoing.
Re:Study: Time-Restricted Eating Improves Cardiovascular Hea...
by resoluteteeth on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @10:27AM
(#33096005)
> Is the position of that window relevant?
Who knows!
This seems like one of the things that makes it hard to test intermittent fasting: there are a bunch of variables other than just the length of the window.
Re:Study: Time-Restricted Eating Improves Cardiovascular Hea...
by swyx on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @08:32AM
(#33094603)
so lunch AND dinner or just early dinner? always feel like these hourly windows are underspecified since you can cram a ton of food in that time
Re:Study: Time-Restricted Eating Improves Cardiovascular Hea...
by resoluteteeth on Wednesday October 05, 2022 @10:25AM
(#33095978)
If it's a 10 hour window presumably most people are eating multiple meals, but it's not really underspecified since you can eat whenever you want during that time.
There are other people doing 4 hour windows for IF in which case it's more like a single meal, but that's not what this study tested.
(This is just explaining the idea, not advocating IF)