Apparently you cared enough about it to start watching it after reading the title. A video with "Rust" and "Tokio" in the title will probably be unwatchable if it has a like to dislike ratio of 1 to 3, even if the title signals you that you want to see that video. But since there no longer exists this ratio, you'll have to watch it partially only to notice that it is bad. And then dislike it (and then have this dislike action have no effect whatsoever in future recommendations, apparently).

I absolutely hate it that they removed the dislike counter, it was so valuable.

I don't know what you think the decision making process was on that, but you're wrong.

Such decisions are not made on one single metric. these are multi faceted decisions.

Could dislike counts/ratios per like/view/minute been part of the decision? Absolutely. Did certain topics were worse than others? Again, yes.

Is this a whole story? No. Could this have been part of the decision process? It would be hard to convince me it wasn't at least due to human nature.

OK thanks for the clarity.

I would guess that for a given class of videos, there's going to be a fairly regular amount of dislikes that are going to be because of behaviour like "I am not interested in this video". So if you come across a video in that class of videos (e.g., car repairs), and it has a much higher ratio of dislikes to likes, it's probably a good indication that there's more to those dislikes than just "I'm not interested" -- more likely the video is factually wrong, poor quality, etc.

If it's a "how-to" video the dislike counter would show that this method doesn't work anymore or never worked well in the first place

Especially for software or websites, for some reason I can't find niche stuff easily on search engines, but there's an Indian guy that just tells you how to use a website. If the website doesn't work anymore I'd like to see a decreasing thumbs up ratio.

I did find a website that let me watch a video with violence in it without logging in to youtube. It looks like they just mirror the video you access from youtube. But this kind of a site will easily get shut down with some legal notice from YouTube.

I actually want a thumbs graph, to see if the video has been gaining likes or gaining dislikes recently.

> In previous HN discussions, it's become apparent that some people use it to say "I am not interested in this video".

THEY HAVE "NOT INTERESTED BUTTON"

IT'S JUST FUCKING HIDDEN https://imgur.com/a/fXjiBCu

All they need to do is to put it beside dislikes

If only we had a way to spend billions of $¥€ on putting the greatest minds in the World into a single company who could solve this at the drop of a hat.

It has to be control, right, surely Google are competent to fix this overnight of they wished?

That implies that the current functionality is broken, for Google's purpose.

My guess is, they calculate that they make more money with this configuration than the alternative.

The _only_ problem with dislike button was that if affected ad buyers (game/movie publishers) and YT corporate - the worst crime of all.

>On December 13, 2018, YouTube Rewind 2018: Everyone Controls Rewind became the most disliked video on the video sharing platform, with 15 million dislikes rapidly surpassed the music video for Justin Bieber's song "Baby"

You can dislike random people, but Susan hearing her pupil star employees content is shit is where you cross the line. Especially when it happens again next year: "YouTube Rewind 2019: For the Record"

How much do these factors matter, though? Similar arguments can be made about uselessness of the like button. Some press it to indicate good, relevant content, some press it to support the topic, some like factual content, some use likes for later reference in "liked videos".

If you pivot a bit to Facebook videos, you can see heavily "liked" videos where huge portion of top comments are literally some form of "waste of my time", "idiotic video" and so on.

It’s not of zero use, even if it’s imperfect. The perspective shared in the comment you’re replying to is a great example of this, unless you deny the validity of their reasoning or experience.

I think the solution would be to just make the down-vote do nothing but increment the visible counter, and also make it so that users that can't comment if they already voted. This allows people to simply signal their disapproval without fighting repetitive flamewars in the comments or suppressing content they don't like.

Or maybe if you're running a forum where you want to promote controversial content and hide boring content, just make the downvote act identical to the upvote, so users are incentivized to downvote and argue if they think it is argue-worthy and just ignore if they think it is too boring to discuss.

In the spirit of POSIWOD, I suggest POBIHOU: the purpose of a button is how it's used.

Designers may have an intention. People will apply their own needs and usage to features, in the spirit of desire paths.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_wha...>

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desire_path>

If people are using "dislike" to indicate that they're not interested in content, particularly in a context in which there are few other ways to do so, then that is what the button means.

You might extend that more broadly to any aspect of a UI/UX.

In a past life I designed some elements of a content moderation / feedback system. Among the more amusing aspects of that was encountering people who told me that I was using the system I'd designed wrong.

That should be POSIWID and POBIHIU, I suppose...

As an aggregate, having a largely positive or largely negative feeling about something still provides good information to whomever's asking. It may not be ALL the information, but it's still hugely valuable.

It's not dissimilar to the buttons asking if you enjoyed your washroom visit. Sure, it seems vague and stupid, but if one of your 30 washrooms is suddenly reporting 50% "dislikes", you know something is wrong.

I know people get upset about the political implications of She-Hulk or COVID or Rings of Power dislikes, but surely one would think the positive information for the content creator outweigh the negatives here. There were times when all of Justin Bieber's content sat at around 5%. This was probably an annoyance for his PR team, but I doubt many of them thought the feature should be removed entirely.

Fact is that it already worked well, no point in trying to find unnecessary confusions

Same arguments can be made for the like button. I do like it because, funny, informative, correct information etc.

No use case defined = use as you see fit.

I see a future in which there are no likes and dislikes but sentiment is inferred and weighed according to its objective importance.

The not interested option already exists, it's just buried. Maybe youtube could bring that to the surface..

If, in fact, that option actually does anything. I'm far from sure that it does. It doesn't seem to affect anything for me.

I'm ready to pay that prize for a functional site.

I think that's part of the problem with black box algorithms controlling a large portion of the internet.

The exact same applies to the like button too but you don't see anyone removing that.

Here is a third, I dislike when the video is clickbait, or far from what I expected.