News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by kasabali on Sunday March 13, 2022 @09:53AM (#30661207)
Comments in the linked thread are spot on. Manufacturers would do anything to avoid abiding spirit of that law to keep their bottom line.

What's more depressing is "tech enthusiast" circle (eg. in reddit or hardware forums) will be more than eager to rationalize, defend and disseminate any weak technical excuse made up by manufacturers for keeping their anti consumer practices.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by nickysielicki on Sunday March 13, 2022 @07:20PM (#30666785)
I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but have you ever worked for a company where you were involved with making physical things?

Making things is an incredibly difficult dance between electrical engineers, purchasers, manufacturers, sales and product managers, and logistics teams. I think that people who work exclusively in software often trivialize how difficult it is to choose how many of something to produce, how many extra pieces to keep around for repairs, etc., because they took some EE classes in school and they think that they basically understand the process of making boards.

The reality is the actual engineering is usually the easy part. The hard part is logistics, and it's not something that you can just outsource to a dedicated purchaser and be done with. Software people don't actually have something analogous.

For everyone that works in hardware, the last 2 years has been hell in terms of quickly redesigning things around parts availability, often stripping functionality entirely and reevaluating how it can be done generically in software without a certain chip. We make PoE devices and we can't get validated ethernet PHYs.

Basically, what I'm saying is this: as someone who sees how things are made, the idea that there's some guiding principle of being evil or some principle of maximizing overall bottom line at all costs and making shit products is just so far from the truth that it makes my head spin. Things suck because it's hard.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by max51 on Monday March 14, 2022 @12:20AM (#30668492)
>The reality is the actual engineering is usually the easy part. The hard part is logistics

I disagree. It's the opposite. If you have a hard logistic problem to solve, there is a very large number of companies who can solve all your issue very quickly. Moving cargo around the globe, renting buildings, buying off-the-self industrial equipment, etc.. that's a problem that has been solved a long time ago. All you need is money and a few phone calls.

Designing a good product on the other hand is not something that gets a lot more complicated and most companies can't do it even with best efforts, good talents, and lots of cash.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by andrei_says_ on Sunday March 13, 2022 @09:58PM (#30667737)
I totally get that.

I also remember the little Nokias with replaceable batteries.

And I’m wondering - wouldn’t standardizing batteries make the availability issue easier to solve?

Could you - from the viewpoint of your expertise help me understand why this is something that wouldn’t work? I know my view is pretty simplistic.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by lamontcg on Sunday March 13, 2022 @01:02PM (#30663220)
Comments in the linked thread are what is annoying about nerd fights.

This is a good and necessary first step. Focusing on all the ways it could be circumvented isn't a rationale for not doing it, they are all just rationales for strengthening it.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by vanderZwan on Sunday March 13, 2022 @09:56AM (#30661237)
True, but the alternative of not pushing back leads to an even more dystopian future so I'll take picking a fight with them
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by amelius on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:06AM (#30661325)
Yeah, but tech enthusiasts typically prefer to stay in their comfy chairs, and in their favorite echo chambers, so they don't have any real world impact.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by hackernewds on Sunday March 13, 2022 @01:49PM (#30663810)
Says the tech enthusiast on his armchair?
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by avs733 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:37PM (#30667968)
speaking for myself, not the OP - I am sitting on the ground, my armchair manufacturer went out of business and the padding turned into a brick when their license server went offline.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by agumonkey on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:29AM (#30661488)
what kind of excuse ? i'm curious
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by goosedragons on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:36AM (#30661556)
Anything that justifies it. You still see people claim that losing the headphone jack on the iPhone was "worth it" so it could be waterproof without port covers despite the fact phones with both already existed before it. So expect a lot of claims about how people NEED their laptop to be 1 cm thick, that by not having a removable battery it can have more battery, etc.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Multicomp on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:54AM (#30661735)
I still look to the Galaxy S5 Active[1] for a phone that puts to the lie the claims that smart devices need to entirely lose ports and functionality in order to be water resistant. Tidily enough it had all 3 of the so-called 'must go' features and was still water resistant.

1. MicroSD card

1. Headphone Jack

1. Removable battery

If it was possible in 2014 and the days of Micro USB, it's possible today.

[1] https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s5_active-6356.php

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Bud on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:39AM (#30662195)
"Water resistant" is a meaningless, vague term, of course. The question is how resistant. That phone was IP67 rated.

Current iPhones are IP68 rated, which is markedly superior.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by tobias2014 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:25PM (#30662749)
IP67 is as "waterproof" / "immersion proof" as IP68. Both must withstand 1 meter immersion depth up to 30 minutes. The only advantage as far as I can tell is up to the manufaturer "The test depth and duration is expected to be greater than the requirements for IPx7": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_Code
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by raron on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:57AM (#30662413)
The S9+ is IP68, it has MicroSD, USB type-C and headphone jack (unfortunately no user-replaceable battery).
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Tams80 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:31PM (#30662824)
Ummm, you chose one of the standards that compared to the tier below it is only differentiated by manufacturers' own specifications.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by ClumsyPilot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:52AM (#30662358)
'Superior' is meaningless, vague judgement of course. The questions are how resistant does it need to be, and how resistant can it be?

Does anyone care that iPhone is IP68 instead of IP67?

Does anything stop you drom making a phone with a headphone jack and microSD card that will survive submersion to the depth of 2 miles?

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by hughrr on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:58AM (#30661770)
On the 3.5mm jack front I spent the 80s, 90s and 00s living with crackly ass headphone jacks on stuff. I’m glad they have died finally.

My MacBook battery is replaceable. I don’t want removable as I don’t ever swap batteries.

These aren’t losses. They are whimpers from people who are living through rose tinted glasses.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by goosedragons on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:09AM (#30661867)
Yeah. Bluetooth sound quality is perfect. Never ever drops out, has static, never sounds compressed either and you certainly don't have to consider what codecs and versions both devices support to get the best listening experience.

Is your MacBook battery easily replaceable or is glued in making it a danger to be removed by an amateur at home? And even if you never swap batteries how does having it removable effect you really?

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by ambrose2 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:32AM (#30662098)
Bluetooth sounds fine, but it can introduce latency that you wouldn’t experience with a direct connection. Which is fine for listening to music and even video calls are ok, but a minor proportion of the population working on music production will experience that latency. On a smartphone that’s a pretty rare use case, so it’s fine.

Batteries: I extended the life of my 2010 MacBook by swapping the battery and it was very easy. Apple is going to come out with kits for amateurs to do part changes themselves for the iPhone, where that part change will be harder (broken screen swap) than swapping out a MB battery.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by goosedragons on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:16PM (#30662639)
Latency is extremely noticeable with some headphones for videos/games. My Bose QC buds are just completely useless for them. Other pairs I have are better but the Bose are music/call only headphones. Thanks for reminding me of that extra problem.

2010 MBP were far more repairable than the modern stuff. After that Apple started gluing down the batteries which required prying to remove.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by ClumsyPilot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:00PM (#30662452)
> Bluetooth sounds fine

Bluetooth is absolutely atrocious, every 2-way call over bluetooth is sampled down to absolute garbage because the meager bandwidth is halved and the codec in prehistoric

https://habr.com/en/post/456182/

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by hughrr on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:18PM (#30662654)
Sounds amazing when I make calls with my airpods so I don't think that statement holds.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by hughrr on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:39AM (#30662191)
Can’t say I’ve ever had those problems. It just works here.

I’ve got a 14” MBP. It has pull tags and is easy to replace. I’d still take it in apple store to get it replaced.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by goosedragons on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:10PM (#30662580)
And I've never had crackly ass headphone jacks. Just works here.

Pull tabs are only slightly better. If the tabs break you're just back to prying off adhesive and the tabs do break if you're not careful.

And what are you going to do in 7 years when you're trying to get it working as a laptop for your kid or something and Apple tells you they no longer service that model as it's "vintage"?

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by hughrr on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:14PM (#30662616)
My kids have current, supported Apple computers.

I've also replaced several batteries in Apple products, even without pull tabs and it's not difficult.

Regarding replacements, my mother's 6s just got a second new battery last month and it's still supported after 7 years.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by goosedragons on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:29PM (#30662813)
Apple's vintage clock starts when they stop selling something. They sold the 6s until 2018. They rarely sell MBPs for more than a year so usually in 7 years they're done.

I'm glad you're currently well to do and can afford all new shit for your kids. Some people can't and sometimes a repair is the only option. Is it worth making repair considerably harder for a few extra mm of thinness and less than a hundred grams of weight? I'd argue no. Compare the repair of a 2010 MBP with one from 2016 and then tell me the 2016 one is easy.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by hughrr on Sunday March 13, 2022 @01:46PM (#30663773)
There was a bit of a black hole I agree. The 2021 models are much improved.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Noos on Monday March 14, 2022 @10:22AM (#30672772)
On the flip side, headphone jacks can wear out entirely. And one of the advances bluetooth has over normal jacks is that it's now possible for headphones to have mics on them capable of answering calls. Sort of similar to wireless charging, its possible to wear out ports from overuse.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by tremon on Monday March 14, 2022 @12:59PM (#30674903)
one of the advances bluetooth has over normal jacks is that it's now possible for headphones to have mics on them capable of answering calls

Headsets with mics on them did exist before bluetooth, and so did headsets with control buttons (source: my early-2000s portable mp3 player). The only thing bluetooth added to the mix is cross-device compatibility.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Tams80 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:32PM (#30662844)
You should have just not bought such cheap stuff.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by TrackerFF on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:41AM (#30661615)
I've seen the following:

- Notebooks would become thicker and clunkier. They don't want that.

- Same for cellphones, added with things like less waterproof/humid resistance.

With that said - many of the most vocal "tech enthusiasts" consume a lot. These are the people that are passionate about consumer electronics, and will purchase new phones/laptops/TVs/etc. every 1-2 years. So I'm not really sure why they'd care too much about phones etc. potentially not living their maximum lifespan.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by wrycoder on Sunday March 13, 2022 @01:08PM (#30663292)
There are “tech users”, like myself, who buy a quality product and run it until it becomes unsupported. I keep iPhones about five years, which requires a battery replacement.

I’ve replaced several iPhone batteries myself - I have the necessary tools, including the opening tool. Outside of it being a fiddly job involving miniature connectors, I find that the replacement batteries don’t last as long as the OEM ones, even when bought from iFixit.

Also, the battery is glued to the back shell, and the release tapes usually break, because the hot rice bag isn’t as hot as the heated vacuum stage that Apple uses. Then you have to work a monofilament under the battery, which is an annoying three hand job, if you don’t have the stage.

Apple gets $69 to replace the battery. Given the above, that’s reasonable. But, the nearest service is an hour away. The real decision is the personal time and delay to get to and from the service place (twice, or wait around for a couple of hours) vs spend an hour to do it myself.

If the battery was OEM and came out easily, I’d do it myself, every time.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by agumonkey on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:57AM (#30661756)
thickness I don't mind but waterproof would be sad, that said it would be weird if companies can't make sealed case without glueing everything
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by kasabali on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:30AM (#30662074)
I don't know how much glue was involved but Galaxy S5 was waterproof and had a user replaceable battery.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Liquid_Fire on Sunday March 13, 2022 @08:35PM (#30667262)
There was no glue, you just popped out the back panel and took the battery out with your fingers in 5 seconds.

On the other hand, it did have a plastic cap on the micro USB port which you had to open every time in order to charge it. I'm not sure if this was a limitation of micro USB (or whatever the Samsung-specific extension next to it was) - modern phones with open USB C ports seem to have no problem being waterproof.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by dahfizz on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:22PM (#30667890)
Tangentially, the S5 had a USB 3.0 micro b port[1]. It was not Samsung specific, but it was not widely used either.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-USB-3-0-Cable-Male/dp/B0...

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Bud on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:41AM (#30662220)
No, it was not "waterproof". It had an IP67 water/dust rating, which is inferior to the IP68 rating achieved by current iPhones.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Tams80 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:33PM (#30662863)
Stop repeating something you clearly know nothing about.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by tobias2014 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:25PM (#30662756)
IP67 is as "waterproof" / "immersion proof" as IP68. Both must withstand 1 meter immersion depth up to 30 minutes. The only advantage as far as I can tell is up to the manufaturer "The test depth and duration is expected to be greater than the requirements for IPx7": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_Code
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by ClumsyPilot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:10PM (#30662579)
IP68 is not 'waterproof', Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is IP69 rated and has an SD card
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by loeg on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:22PM (#30662715)
I like my electronics waterproof. That’s a hell of a lot harder with replaceable batteries.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by doctorwho42 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:49PM (#30663065)
Define "hell of a lot harder"

Phone replaceable battery; a rubber gasket and 3-4 screws - waterproof up to 5-6ft.

Though I guess you could get away with a cheaper clip based approach... Like some cheap Chinese ham radios. I had a friend drop one in a lake, then pull it out (maybe 3ft deep). You wanna know what part broke? The speaker - it was a bit muffled, but that's due to probably water penetration and pressure on that membrane.

It really is shocking how many people think it's "hard" to waterproof a small battery if it can be removed. Tupperware is water proof, doesn't cost a lot to make. Why would a battery encased in plastic be any harder? Especially for multi-billion dollar companies who can afford to scoop up some of the best engineers and have them work on consumer devices.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by anuvrat1 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @01:15PM (#30663385)
How can people forget Samsung Galaxy S5, IP67 with removable battery.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by vvillena on Sunday March 13, 2022 @02:59PM (#30664579)
Or the old Motorola Defy from 2010. IP67, removable battery, and near indestructible.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Izkata on Sunday March 13, 2022 @05:08PM (#30665715)
Or, before smartphones, waterproof with removable batteries was really common.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by nicolast on Wednesday March 16, 2022 @10:30AM (#30699277)
GoPro would like a word.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by naoqj on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:09AM (#30661338)
I like my phone thin and sturdy and I have no interest in replacing batteries myself.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by palijer on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:33AM (#30661523)
That's a false dichotomy. User replaceable batteries don't come at the cost of thin and sturdy phones.

Laptop manufacturers have been saying that for years, and look at the Framework.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by noirbot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:06PM (#30662525)
As someone who bought a Framework to try to support a better model, my #1 complaint about it by far is that the battery is essentially worthless. It maybe gets 3 hours of use on a full charge, and 9 hours while closed and hibernated.

I returned a M1 Macbook Air to get the Framework instead, so essentially, I've now paid 50% more to get a laptop with almost infinitely worse battery life when idle and 3-4x worse battery life in use. It's also slower, heavier, thicker, and has a screen resolution that a lot of apps don't know how to use well.

At this rate, I better be able to replace the battery because I'm having to do a full charge/discharge cycle multiple times a day if I'm not just constantly leaving it plugged in.

I love the idea of it in theory, but it's essentially a worse laptop than even the decade-old Apple laptops that did have replaceable batteries.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by pbhjpbhj on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:20PM (#30662691)
You seem to think that Framework can fix their battery by gluing it in and welding the case shut?
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by noirbot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:39PM (#30662938)
I don't know, but whatever they did has made for a decidedly worse laptop, and I assume they didn't set out to make a laptop that had an essentially unusable battery. I'm assuming good intent on their part that this is the best laptop they could make with the parts/design constraints. I'll be happy if the v2 of it is better though.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by stolsvik on Monday March 14, 2022 @02:48AM (#30669212)
Is it the battery, or the power usage of the laptop? The battery is a pretty physical thing, storing that many Watt-hours. If you have a 100 Wh battery, Apple uses 10 W and Framework 50 W, then you’ll get a 5x difference on the same battery.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by noirbot on Monday March 14, 2022 @09:18AM (#30672065)
Does it matter? It's not as if I designed this laptop myself. I had 2 options. If you can only put a battery in your laptop that holds X W/hrs of power and you sell it with a CPU and other components that demand enough power to drain it in 3 hours, then that's a design flaw.

At least unless you put a big glaring "This laptop has 3 hours battery life" on the purchase page. Instead, they just repeatedly say how many Watts the battery holds and leaves you to assume that it's such a big number that it'll have great battery life.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by gcthomas on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:26PM (#30662772)
> It's also slower, heavier, thicker,

The Framework and M1 Macbook Air weight the same at 1.3 kg, and are both 16 mm thick, according to the specs that I can find. Did it really _seem_ thicker and heavier to you?

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by noirbot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:43PM (#30662991)
I'm a little surprised, but the weight being roughly the same makes sense. The thickness is a little deceptive. I think they're both measured from their thickest point, but the Framework is essentially a solid brick with only a slight taper on the front and back edge, while the Air tapers to nearly a point on a number of sides. For reference, Apple lists the Air at:

Height: 0.16–0.63 inch (0.41–1.61 cm)

So they're the same thickness at their thickest point, but I'd guess that the Air has much less of the laptop at that thickness. I'd be curious about a volumetric comparison.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Dunedan on Sunday March 13, 2022 @01:34PM (#30663636)
It's not the battery size which is the issue here, but how much power the hardware uses. The capacity of the battery of the Framework is 55W, while the capacity of the battery of the M1 MacBook Air is 49,9Wh. So apparently Framework managed to fit a larger battery in a equally large case, without the need to glue it in.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by noirbot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @02:45PM (#30664442)
To my point above, I'm pretty sure the Framework case is quite a bit larger in volume than the MBA case, so it's not really apples to apples there. Perhaps it's just that the Intel processor in the Framework is a massive energy hog (likely), but even my old Intel Macbook had easily 2x the battery life.

In the end, I wasn't even trying to say that the battery size mattered. If anything, the fact that it's a bigger battery almost makes it worse. They crammed more battery in and it's still a drastically worse user experience when it comes to everything about the battery.

Some of this is definitely because they're having to buy worse parts to try to make sure they're replaceable, and maybe that would improve if more places made parts for it. Maybe I could upgrade to a more efficient CPU/Mobo in the future, or a better battery, but then what do I do with the old one? I'm still contributing to e-waste.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by tjoff on Sunday March 13, 2022 @03:47PM (#30665010)
Well, you'd have almost twice the battery-life, if you used Windows.

And you can get comparable results in Linux, but you need to tweak it yourself at the moment.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by noirbot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @08:26PM (#30667196)
I'm using Linux and Windows. I regret to inform you that neither helps all that much. I've even spent a decent amount of time shoving values into config files to try to improve things on Linux.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by mixmastamyk on Sunday March 13, 2022 @07:36PM (#30666901)
The comparison begins and ends with M1 vs Intel chip. Linux is the second factor unfortunately.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by noirbot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @08:27PM (#30667200)
I like that everyone just assumes I'm using Linux. But even my 2017 Macbook on Intel was doing better than this, and the issues I'm seeing with Framework occur on Fedora and Windows essentially equally.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by goosedragons on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:12PM (#30667827)
The 2017 MacBook MacBook with just 1 port and a battery 8/10ths the size of Framework but with a CPU that is under a quarter the wattage in TDP? (7 vs. 28W?). And has a lower screen resolution (yes it matters) and has a manufacturer custom tweaked OS?
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by noirbot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:36PM (#30667962)
Correct? And yet, with all of that, that old Macbook was a more capable laptop in almost every way than the Framework I have now. It doesn't matter that the Framework has a better CPU or monitor if it dies halfway through even a short flight. And all the extra resolution only helps so much if both Linux and Windows barely handle the resolution/aspect ratio well.

The ports are great - I love that about the Framework, but having an HDMI port only matters so much if the battery is so bad you can't even show a fully movie on a TV with it not plugged in to power (and with a fairly beefy power transformer at that.)

I'm not arguing the Framework isn't more powerful on paper, but functionally, I just can barely use it. I was on a trip the other month and walked to a coffee shop in the morning to do some work and lost 20% of my battery charge on the way to the shop with it just in my backpack. Every minute using it I'm aware of how fast it's discharging in a way that literally no other electronic device I've owned in a decade has made me think about it.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by goosedragons on Monday March 14, 2022 @09:05AM (#30671940)
I've heard the HDMI expansion in the framework can draw 1W doing nothing. Heard similar things about other framework expansions.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by makeitdouble on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:34AM (#30662122)
Just ask for someone else to replace your battery, these laws wouldn’t prevent that.

Making better designs to allow for easier to replace batteries isn’t crazy hard either, current designs already tend toward that. This proposal seem to only mandate that “users should be able to exchange them with commercially available tools.” so it leaves a pretty wide array of options for the manufacturers. They could probably even make their own custom tools available if this is what it takes yo keep phones thin and sturdy as you want them.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by dotancohen on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:40AM (#30661604)
My Note 3 with replaceable battery was 8.3 mm thick. How thin is your non-battery replaceable phone?
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by naoqj on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:46AM (#30661656)
7.4 mm. (iphone 12)
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by frenchman99 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:04AM (#30661824)
Is 0.9mm really worth throwing away so many phones?

It's important to remind ourselves that the metals in these phones are mined in part by people with very difficult life conditions, often so bad that they die on the job. We ought to be able to repair what they contributed to build instead of asking them to mine yet another pound of metal just so we can save 0.9mm. This will also reduce need for mining, which creates all sorts of pollution.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by HWR_14 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:47PM (#30668026)
> Is 0.9mm really worth throwing away so many phones?

Quite the opposite. I want larger/heavier devices. Make my phone a bit thicker and heavier and sturdier, please. I feel the same about a laptop. I recently got a new laptop, and the flimsiness of high-end machines was a turnoff. The salesman kept saying "but it's only X lbs, so much lighter" as though that was a selling point. But I want strong hinges, large replaceable batteries, etc. I could care less about 3 vs 7 lbs.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by goodpoint on Sunday March 13, 2022 @02:35PM (#30664342)
I don't understand this fetish with thin phones and laptops.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Bud on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:37AM (#30662167)
You don't have to throw those phones away right now. Apple can easily replace batteries for you. The consumer doesn't need to be able to do this with a bigass Philips-head screwdriver in order to accomplish this goal.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by frenchman99 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:46AM (#30662288)
If any third party repair shop can replace it, that'd already quite good. But manufacturers have been known to make it impossible even for 3rd party repair shops to do anything, or at least to make their lifes as hard as possible. That's a no-no.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by doctorwho42 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:53PM (#30663113)
Define "but ass Philips head screwdriver".

You could do this #2 screws which are tiny, use 3-6 of them around the edge. Add a rubber gasket. And you have a water proof battery that is replaceable in under 5 minutes with a precision Philips head (aka those little screwdriver heads you get with the multi-head screwdriver kits)

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by naoqj on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:05AM (#30661844)
I am going to give you a candid answer: I don't give a shit.

That answer is going to sound unpopular here, but deep down is how most people feel.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by rpdillon on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:38AM (#30662181)
This is one of the central supporting arguments for government regulation: customers won't pick what's better for society, but rather according to their own short-term needs. Since customers don't care, companies don't either (save those that use their environmental concern as part of their marketing...I suspect most of those measures don't really move the needle, though). That leaves only government. I wish it weren't this way, but I can't argue with the evidence.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by ornornor on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:34AM (#30662131)
I guess cars would be slightly lighter and faster without seatbelts or airbags.

Or planes would cost slightly less to fly if they were not required to carry safety equipment.

That’s exactly because people like you don’t give a shit and corporations will do anything to save/make a buck that laws and regulations like this have to be made and enforced.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by catlifeonmars on Sunday March 13, 2022 @07:34PM (#30666878)
> people like you don’t give a shit

Let’s be honest here: This is all of us to some degree. OP is just one of the few that admits it.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by HWR_14 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:54PM (#30668070)
Is this all of us to some degree? Or is this you and OP and you tell yourselves it's everyone to make yourself feel better?

Or is your "to some degree" take into accounts degrees so small as to be meaningless?

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by catlifeonmars on Monday March 14, 2022 @11:02AM (#30673246)
I interpreted OPs sentiment to be an example of consumerism. Individually, sure, “some degree” could be considered meaningless, but collectively, the sentiment drives supply and production decisions, so no, I don’t think it’s a spurious or meaningless assertion to make.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by HWR_14 on Monday March 14, 2022 @11:43AM (#30673771)
His point was very clearly about each individual and not cooperative behavior. And I deny that "each individual" doesn't care unless "to some degree" is used to support degrees so small they are approximately nonexistant
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by catlifeonmars on Monday March 14, 2022 @01:57PM (#30675668)
I have never seen appealing to personal responsibility drive change at a large scale. Like all creatures, humans are driven by a balance of incentives and disincentives. If you want to drive change, systemically alter the balance. I think the approach of the policy discussed in TFA is aligned with this view.

I’m not sure exactly where we our disagreement lies, but I think it’s a mistake to dismiss small degrees of sentiment as those small degrees manifest as purchase decisions, which collectively manifest as multimillion dollar industries that are supported by those individual actions. Additionally, asserting that someone either cares or doesn’t care and that there’s not some continuum is a false dichotomy.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by HWR_14 on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @02:35AM (#30682277)
I agree that systemic changes are important. However, I disagree that personal responsibility cannot drive sufficient behavior. Look at individuals recycling.

But we're talking about this line of discussion. Which was sparked by someday saying they didn't care and no one did. I objected to the latter part of that. It's bullshit that no one cares. There are ethical vegans and people who do all kinds of things because of personal responsibility.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by naoqj on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:41AM (#30662222)
That makes no sense because people won't buy cars without seatbelts or airbags - and if they do, it's them dying, which they should have the freedom to do.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by ornornor on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:49AM (#30662323)
It’s not only the owner of the car dying. It’s also the passengers who may or may not have had a say in the decision. Never mind the cost to society as a whole from medical bills resulting in these preventable injuries, the psychological trauma for survivors/witnesses, or the effect of orphaned children growing up without parents.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by 29083011397778 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:04PM (#30662499)
I'd say you're dead wrong here - just look at the pushback against seatbelts when the laws were introduced. Look at the devices on sale, today, to defeat seat belt alarms.

Regarding your second point, that's also objectively incorrect. When accidents happen, passengers, especially backseat passengers, become projectiles that cause additional injuries or excess deaths for other occupants. It's not just the dude not wearing a seatbelt dying, it's also the people around them.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by frenchman99 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:54AM (#30662385)
Don't you worry, if we keep using the planet like we currently do, and like you do by saying you don't give a shit, then we'll all die soon enough because of our lack of respect for our environment — lack of access to clean water will hit loads of people in the coming decades.

Either that or we come up with laws that keep us competitive without destroying everything around us. I hope that's what Europe will do and I will support regulation that takes a tiny bit of comfort away if it makes us more resilient in the face of climate change and geopolitical difficulties.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by frenchman99 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:50AM (#30662331)
Whether you give a shit or not isn't important. Regardless what you personally think, a law is accepted if it's acceptable. And most people will think "OK, I get that we can't continue to throw away phones and keep using some countries as slaves just because we want the latest iPhone now". Just like people in Europe accept to pay more taxes than in other places of the world because we get that solidarity is important.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Tams80 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:24PM (#30662746)
It's unpopular because it makes you a selfish cunt.

And yes, many, if not most people are selfish cunts in many ways. Myself included.

But that does not make it good. It is something that you, I, and everyone else should be deeply ashamed of.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by ensan on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:24AM (#30662016)
When did how most people “feel deep down” become a sound policy making strategy?

To be candid: in some matters, the regulators should not give a shit about how you want your phone.

Good for EU and their mandates.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by naoqj on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:34AM (#30662128)
I don't understand. Are you saying that the government should do whatever they want even if it goes against what the majority of the population wants? That is everything but democratic.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by Tams80 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:28PM (#30662787)
Democracy isn't and shouldn't be absolute.

And you do realise that no countries have complete democracy? Even Switzerland with their many referendums doesn't put every decision to a democratic vote. Partly for practical and pragmatic reasons, but also because some things are best not decided by the masses.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by HWR_14 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:59PM (#30668088)
The government frequently makes everyone do things they would rather not do because the aggregate result is good. And the results of the collective action make everyone happy to the point that the law is supported. That's the basis of all tragedy of the commons based laws.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by pbhjpbhj on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:29PM (#30662803)
The clear point is people that don't "give a shit" about the environment or their fellow people are not the majority and so the government should continue to make environmentally lead decisions regardless of the existence of sociopaths.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by dotancohen on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:37PM (#30662912)
Democracy has many flaws, you just identified one of them.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by ClumsyPilot on Sunday March 13, 2022 @11:45AM (#30662269)
> I don't give a shit

Applying the golden rule, so why should anyone give a shit about what you think?

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by bobbean on Sunday March 13, 2022 @10:30AM (#30661502)
There's some pretty smart people in the field, don't you think if they are forced to come up with a solution that they will?
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by doctorwho42 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:54PM (#30663130)
You can have both thin, sturdy, and replaceable batteries.

It really isn't that hard. Maybe a few extra days of design and development by a team of engineers. If that... Once you come up with your preferred design, it more or less can be replicated to every other similar device.

Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by catlifeonmars on Sunday March 13, 2022 @07:29PM (#30666846)
I agree with your sentiment overall, but “a few extra days” is pretty unrealistic. Probably a few extra weeks at best.
Re:EU to make it mandatory to use customer-replaceable batte... by CRConrad on Tuesday March 15, 2022 @09:25PM (#30694173)
> I agree with your sentiment overall, but “a few extra days” is pretty unrealistic. Probably a few extra weeks at best.

Still not a problem: The examples upthread of phones from many different manufacturers that had replaceable batteries, headphone jacks, and card readers and were watertight a decade or more ago show that those weeks have already been invested and paid for.