But you tried nonetheless, I give you that. Brave but dead.
Lavrov said, they didn't threaten with nukes.That means they did. That creature was bred and selected over decades for such jobs.
Actually I just indulge in fantasies of burning bastards.
Russians are in favor of Putin. And of course, the apparatus has been driving up approval ratings for him for months before this stunt. And now most Russian don't know anything from independent sources, some probably didn't even heard about that Ukraine Peace Operation. A lot of them just believe the whole narrative, because, well, it's the decadent West that says otherwise and 'they want to hold us down. They always do.'
So even if there is a fraction in the apparatus at all that would or could act, there alway looms the danger of a civil war for them.
They have set the anchor in these negotiations between us and them. They want status quo ante 1997. They will at least get Ukraine. Perhaps Moldavia.
And they created chaos. Which always also bears opportunity.
And China will wait.
They can want whatever they want, doesn't mean they are going to get it.
> They don't fight us, they fight the Ukraine.
They don't fight us, they fight Poland!
This sort of thing doesn't really work.
>> They can want whatever they want, doesn't mean they are going to get it.
They won't.
>> This sort of thing doesn't really work.
They somehow missed that.
They will pay.
Fog of War.
One of about 8 people seemed to genuinely support Putin (something like "he knows what he's doing, this is necessary").
Obviously just a vox pop but in general it seemed few supported the aggression and most were just afraid to talk about it.
https://breakingdefense.com/2022/03/no-the-us-air-force-isnt...
THE WORLD: gasps
UK: These guys were on a holiday there
THE WORLD: claps
Or as the saying goes "Rules for thee and not for me".
PUTIN: These guys were on a holiday there (but actually conducting a war of aggression).
THE WORLD: Gasps in righteous indignation.
UK: These guys were on a holiday there (but actually defending against a war of aggression).
THE WORLD: Claps at the brave defenders.
Or as the saying goes, "Don't sell me a turd in a bun as a hot dog, I ain't buying it".There, fixed that for you.
(OK, except for the "saying"; I just made that up. But, something along those lines. As is, it seems to fit both Putler's blatant immoral lies, the West's equally blatant but morally defensible ones, and your whataboutish equivalizing of the two.)
We all have to thank the Russians to have shown the world in 2014 how to do it. And before that. And also to give us a great opportunity for Whataboutism.
Sigh, I probably still have those Bezmenov brochures from the early eighties lying around somewhere.
"Bombing civilians" is unacceptable if they are from "Europe" like Ukraine.
"Bombing civilians" is fine if they are savages from Middle East, Africa or "not-Europe", like Russia.
But then again, do you really think anybody is still reading this deep in the thread? They're already bored, no shiny tech, just endless babble.
But okay, your next move, Godwin’s law.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%E2%80%99s_law
Game over.
Yet here you are.
> your next move
But.. you invoked it yourself.
"Game over"
But, hey, there are flight simulators out there, aren't there?
Russian military doorstops are a dime a dozen right now in Ukraine.