Re:Obama is RESTful
by kirse on Monday September 08, 2008 @02:26PM
(#298617)
All I know is when I try to go to Obama's homepage at work and click the link for my home state, IE7 tries to download it rather than view the page.
Clearly Obama doesn't give a crap about us average middle-class working Americans stuck in rough jobs (forced on IE instead of Firefox/Chrome) or anyone from Pennsylvania for that matter.
Re:Obama is RESTful
by ntoshev on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @12:31PM
(#299548)
From the Hacker News Guidelines:
Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site. If you think something is spam or egregiously offtopic, you can flag it by going to its page and clicking on the "flag" link. (Not all users will see this; there is a karma threshold.)
Re:Obama is RESTful
by DanielBMarkham on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @05:47AM
(#299249)
This is story #17 on a variation of "My Candidate is more tech-friendly than yours"
The formula is simple. Whatever the board's topic, just add something about your candidate to that. Then claim it is on-topic. Everybody who doesn't like your candidate is stuck having to figure out how to respond, not wanting to get into a political discussion, yet not wanting to see the board go to hell either.
Ok. Ok. Enough already. Candidate X has technology Y. We can argue how Y is cool (or not), how X is cool (or not) or how X choosing Y demonstrates, yet again, that X is cool.
Re:Obama is RESTful
by twism on Monday September 08, 2008 @03:17PM
(#298683)
Although the article is satire, it does show the decision making process each candidate/staff took (although it might not have carried much weight, and may not actually affect the way they govern) when they were faced with the task of "I need a campaign website."
Re:Obama is RESTful
by wheels on Monday September 08, 2008 @07:17PM
(#298903)
No, it doesn't. It shows that Obama's staff / volunteers are more tech savvy than McCain's. Anyone surprised?
The candidate's aren't sitting around picking web servers and figuring out 404 pages. Nobody that was that obsessive of a micromanager could have gotten as far as they have.
Re:Obama is RESTful
by etal on Monday September 08, 2008 @09:42PM
(#298998)
Exactly. Any fool can see that all Obama did was set up some Gentoo instances, compile Apache and PHP with the appropriate CFLAGS, and let his people do their work.
Re:Obama is RESTful
by twism on Monday September 08, 2008 @09:14PM
(#298988)
Sure the candidates are not picking web servers and what not, but I'm sure they had some influence by hiring the most qualified staff, who were versed in the subject at hand, who hired (or hired the staff who hired ...) the people who made the website.
Re:Obama is RESTful
by byrneseyeview on Monday September 08, 2008 @02:42PM
(#298637)
I always thought Open Source was fairly conservative, at least in the Burkean sense. It's a decentralized set of customs, handed down from person to person without being imposed from above or overthrown from below.
Re:Obama is RESTful
by BrandonM on Monday September 08, 2008 @10:59PM
(#299044)
Wow, exceedingly intelligent comments on this thread. (Yes, that's sarcasm.) I'm not going to complain that this is on the front page, but seriously... #1? 77 upvotes?
Re:Obama is RESTful
by statictype on Monday September 08, 2008 @10:54PM
(#299042)
Maybe thats not such a bad idea.
Clearly the person I want in office is the candidate who is the brightest. Who therefore attracts the brightest people to volunteer for his campaign. And results in a sensible web site.
hm... I think CampaignWebSite will be my personal irrelevant and irresponsible metric for electing the Most Powerful Person On Earth.
Can't be any worse than the factors other people use.
Re:Obama is RESTful
by jrockway on Monday September 08, 2008 @02:34PM
(#298626)
Honestly, I'm not going to vote on a candidate based on the version of HTML their website uses. Nor do I care what web server they use, or what their 404 page looks like.
Re:Obama is RESTful
by jrockway on Monday September 08, 2008 @02:48PM
(#298646)
Yeah, it's hard to tell these days whether someone is being funny or if they are just being stupid. Usually it's the second one, especially when politics is involved :)
Clearly Obama doesn't give a crap about us average middle-class working Americans stuck in rough jobs (forced on IE instead of Firefox/Chrome) or anyone from Pennsylvania for that matter.
http://www.imagesocket.com/view/obama_pa_fail0ac.PNG
Edit: Oh wait, the satire is only legitimate when it supports Obama?
"Content you have requested is for mature audience only and requires age verification."
Can anyone try to explain why this picture was "mature"?
Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site. If you think something is spam or egregiously offtopic, you can flag it by going to its page and clicking on the "flag" link. (Not all users will see this; there is a karma threshold.)
The formula is simple. Whatever the board's topic, just add something about your candidate to that. Then claim it is on-topic. Everybody who doesn't like your candidate is stuck having to figure out how to respond, not wanting to get into a political discussion, yet not wanting to see the board go to hell either.
Ok. Ok. Enough already. Candidate X has technology Y. We can argue how Y is cool (or not), how X is cool (or not) or how X choosing Y demonstrates, yet again, that X is cool.
Substitute parameters and repeat ad-infinitum.
Call it a bit comic relief for something that is taken so seriously!
The candidate's aren't sitting around picking web servers and figuring out 404 pages. Nobody that was that obsessive of a micromanager could have gotten as far as they have.
It doesn't get any better.
But it's free market at its best. Both process and result.
Obama is inclusive in his support for PNGs, accommodating even disadvantaged (Internet Explorer) users.
However, in this case, I think it's just a bit of light humour. Cheer up!
hm... I think CampaignWebSite will be my personal irrelevant and irresponsible metric for electing the Most Powerful Person On Earth.
Can't be any worse than the factors other people use.
I don't think anyone else cares either.