News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Obama is RESTful by unexpected on Monday September 08, 2008 @02:17PM (#298605)
I hope this is satire. Please tell me you're not trying estimate how good a president they'd be based on how their websites are designed.
Re:Obama is RESTful by Herring on Monday September 08, 2008 @02:27PM (#298619)
joke ---- whoosh ---->

          O <--- Yuo
        --|--
          |
        / \
Re:Obama is RESTful by run4yourlives on Monday September 08, 2008 @02:51PM (#298652)
Holy crap, he's a centaur!
Re:Obama is RESTful by river_styx on Monday September 08, 2008 @03:14PM (#298678)
And Korean, apparently.
Re:Obama is RESTful by Herring on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @01:04AM (#299117)
Just messing with the OCD crew a bit :)
Re:Obama is RESTful by PieSquared on Tuesday September 09, 2008 @04:26AM (#299216)
It's not OCD, it's CDO. And the letters are in proper alphabetical order, just like they should be.
Re:Obama is RESTful by river_styx on Monday September 08, 2008 @02:29PM (#298623)
I'm voting for Obama because he knows about bubble sort!
Re:Obama is RESTful by pius on Monday September 08, 2008 @03:14PM (#298677)
Re:Obama is RESTful by swombat on Monday September 08, 2008 @02:22PM (#298612)
Great satire has that quality that many of the people it's targeted at don't get that it's satire.

However, in this case, I think it's just a bit of light humour. Cheer up!

Re:Obama is RESTful by statictype on Monday September 08, 2008 @10:54PM (#299042)
Maybe thats not such a bad idea. Clearly the person I want in office is the candidate who is the brightest. Who therefore attracts the brightest people to volunteer for his campaign. And results in a sensible web site.

hm... I think CampaignWebSite will be my personal irrelevant and irresponsible metric for electing the Most Powerful Person On Earth.

Can't be any worse than the factors other people use.

Re:Obama is RESTful by JackDanger on Monday September 08, 2008 @03:19PM (#298685)
It's an awful way to evaluate a leader but it's better than so many of the arguments we're getting from news pundits.