News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by codefreakxff on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:01AM (#29819630)
What you are describing is anecdotal and the same problem we have with Facebook - social group isolation. You have a large number of Catholic schools in your area because you have a large number of Catholics in your area. They are operating under different principles, and so attract people who want those rules. If I went to a Sushi restaurant and proclaimed that nobody wanted Pizza anymore, or to live under the tyranny of tomato sauce and cheese, because nobody in the Sushi restaurant wanted pizza it wouldn't make sense to anyone else.

I know teachers who are very supportive of mask mandates and that the schools and teachers are generally doing ok, and people who I work with who send their kids to schools with masks are very happy for the kids to have socializing opportunities.

Your friends and community are free to find a solution that works for them. But it is not the only way, and it does not make sense to condemn a system that works for the vast majority of people.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by nradov on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:08AM (#29819681)
Mask mandates are collective punishment of children for no real benefit. I absolutely condemn them and they are not a system that works. Most European countries don't require young children to wear masks in schools.

And don't presume to claim that masking children is necessary to protect adults. The adults who want to be vaccinated have been for months.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by bcrosby95 on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:20AM (#29819757)
Yeah well my 7 year old hates wearing pants but I still manage to get her clothed for the classroom.

The only kids I know that have a problem with masks are kids with parents that have a problem with masks. It's not a kid problem its an adult problem. Kids are adaptable but adults are whiny little assholes that are set in their ways.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by rayiner on Thursday January 06, 2022 @08:14AM (#29823135)
Just because kids aren’t actively complaining doesn’t mean it’s not bothering them. My kid is a conformist Asian like me, and we’ve been going along with masking this whole time because her private school is full of democrats. But she broke down crying last fall when she found out that we’d be doing another year of masking. It’s not just the inconvenience of the masks, or the eating outside on the ground, but the whole exercise of disrupting normal life for these kids: no field trips, no birthday parties, etc. We’re into the third year of this reduced childhood.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by mbg721 on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:26AM (#29819817)
If pants had been invented in 2018 in order to cure horniness, I'd treat them with the same gravitas that I give to graham crackers. One person's "set in one's ways" is another person's "doesn't change with the wind".
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by defterGoose on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:53AM (#29819965)
Well that was...some words.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by craftinator on Thursday January 06, 2022 @01:24AM (#29820135)
> If pants had been invented in 2018 in order to cure horniness

What if they'd been invented hundreds of years ago to stop the spread of disease, and prevented millions of deaths since then? Curious that you use a weak and hyperbolic analogy when the reality is so readily available.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by mbg721 on Thursday January 06, 2022 @05:02AM (#29821559)
Well, you can call me foolish, but I don't think COVID is severe enough to be worth long-term realignment of cultural norms around wardrobe. Most people agree with me, which is why so much of the debate has been based on panic.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by hazza_n_dazza on Thursday January 06, 2022 @04:51AM (#29821450)
i had speculated months ago that perhaps cultures that wear veils and mouth coverings originally did it for health purposes
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by nradov on Thursday January 06, 2022 @09:10AM (#29823693)
If that was true, why are only women forced to wear veils? In reality the veils are all about controlling women's sexuality.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by hazza_n_dazza on Thursday January 06, 2022 @06:14PM (#29831987)
you will see that I avoided referencing specific cultres and made claims about the past. too much racism / elitism on HN in some threads, although those issues need to be discussed too.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by yumraj on Thursday January 06, 2022 @04:03AM (#29821078)
Exactly, kids simply reflect what they hear at home.

Go to any store, chin-maskers are with maskless kids, while parents with N95 masks are without kids or with fully masked kids.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by joshuahughes on Thursday January 06, 2022 @05:30AM (#29821805)
Don't kid yourself. Children are suggestible and easily manipulated by adults on BOTH extremes of this polarising argument.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by watwut on Thursday January 06, 2022 @01:58AM (#29820294)
Masks for kids are significantly less issue then you make them be. There is maybe one in 60 kids that acts as if it is punishment and the rest just used to wear them.

And yes, I am in contact with kids. Masks don't bother them all that much.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by danielrpa on Thursday January 06, 2022 @06:54AM (#29822462)
My 12 yr old now feels naked without the mask... Perhaps the mandate isn't very useful, but kids are so adaptable (evolutionary trait!) that this isn't in general a big deal for them.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by jimmaswell on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:14AM (#29819711)
The teachers on the teachers subreddit STILL go on about how bad they have it "risking their lives". It's unbelievably dramatic over what to a vaccinated person is an endemic sniffle. I think they really just want to drag out their WFH situation as long as possible, consequences to the next generation of society be damned.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by saimiam on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:26AM (#29819811)
A. It’s not just an endemic sniffle even for vaccinated people. I lost my sense of smell and got it back way after my quarantine ended, like months after. Plus there’s a mental fog that lifted a long time later. I got Covid after my first shot but before my second.

B. In general, being vaxxed keeps you from getting badly sick but you just can’t say.

E.g., say you’re in a group of a hundred people with a thousand guns trained at your group. Just one gun out of the thousand has a live round while ten others have blank which don’t kill but can injure. Would you be willing to face those odds? Would you be willing to ask others to face the same odds?

These are roughly the odds what you are asking teachers to take on.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by nradov on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:31AM (#29819847)
Think it through longer term. Over the next couple years the odds that teachers and all the rest of us will be infected is approximately 100%. Where the exposure comes from is irrelevant. I am willing to face those odds, and to ask others to do the same.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/vinay-prasad/94646

Fortunately the vaccines and other therapies are quite effective at preventing deaths.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by light_hue_1 on Thursday January 06, 2022 @02:16AM (#29820397)
Even if you have a 100% chance of getting COVID eventually (something that we have zero evidence for) it totally matters when you get it. Sometimes ICUs are overloaded, other times they aren't. If you wait long enough we develop drugs that help. We will make vaccines more effective with time.

What's worse, is a lot of people have long-haul COVID where they suffer severe symptoms that never seem to go away. We have no idea why. Maybe if you get COVID in 5 years we will have figured out why and you get to avoid ruining your life.

Also. COVID is not one and done. You can get it multiple times. People have gotten COVID twice, the first time they were fine, the second time they died.

Not only are you totally misinformed for wanting to "face those odds" you are risking the lives and well-being of those around you.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by nradov on Thursday January 06, 2022 @10:53AM (#29825110)
Hospitals have been overwhelmed during bad flu seasons many times before 2019. We didn't use that as an excuse to impose mandates and restrictions on the rest of society. Omicron is so contagious that your odds of avoiding infection for the next 5 years are approximately zero. Fortunately the vaccines and other therapies we already have are quite effective at preventing deaths. The notion of acting based on the hope that something better might appear at some indefinite point in the future is just absurd.

While reinfections can occur (just as with any coronavirus), symptoms are typically mild. The number of deaths due to reinfections are so low as to be statistically irrelevant from a public policy standpoint.

This panel discussion by several leading physicians provides a good scientific overview of the current situation. It's long, but worth a listen.

https://youtu.be/GklHGYY8vN8

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by cannaceo on Friday January 07, 2022 @10:09AM (#29839972)
I’d like to add that we did wait about a year for the vaccines. That was the treatment that was “good enough” for life to return to normal for me. I don’t need to wait 5 more years. That treatment relieved ~85% of the original risk for me.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by sokoloff on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:53AM (#29819966)
What’s the alternative in your hypothetical? If it’s “never socialize normally again”, then hell yes I’ll fade the mostly prop guns. Even if the alternative is two years of these measures, I think the .99 nearly no-op and .999 survival is way preferable.

This will be endemic, just like the 1968 flu is. The sooner we can get to that point, the better.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by 2muchcoffeeman on Thursday January 06, 2022 @01:42AM (#29820212)
This isn’t some sort of binary choice. You could take some basic precautions in crowded spaces or try new lower risk activities to socialise with friends e.g things you do outside. You know, do what humans have done for thousands of years: adapt.

But people are so eager to go back to exactly how things were.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by light_hue_1 on Thursday January 06, 2022 @02:20AM (#29820430)
> What’s the alternative in your hypothetical? If it’s “never socialize normally again”, then hell yes I’ll fade the mostly prop guns. Even if the alternative is two years of these measures, I think the .99 nearly no-op and .999 survival is way preferable.

What morbid insanity. In the US 850,000 people are dead. That's more dead people than all US soldiers who have died in combat in all wars in history.

Wear a mask, get vaccinated, socially distance, and stop risking your life and that of the people you love.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by dang on Thursday January 06, 2022 @08:22PM (#29833421)
Would you please stop posting in the flamewar style to HN? We're trying for something different here.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by nradov on Thursday January 06, 2022 @08:13AM (#29823120)
Real life is full of risks. You can't seriously expect people to continue socially distancing and wearing masks indefinitely. What morbid insanity.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by joshuahughes on Thursday January 06, 2022 @05:38AM (#29821879)
"I lost my sense of smell and got it back way after my quarantine ended, like months after. Plus there’s a mental fog that lifted a long time later."

I've had exactly the same, and still haven't got my taste or smell back 100% yet. It sucks, but I still can't imagine being so selfish as to expect millions to endure endless global restrictions over some minor personal inconvenience.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by saimiam on Thursday January 06, 2022 @05:50AM (#29821971)
I’m not a fan of endless global restrictions either.

If we don’t like to live with global restrictions at someone else’s say so, why should we expect teachers to go out to teach at our say so? As a group, they have chosen to stay home and that should be that.

It’s not war where the price for not wanting to face the enemy is a cowardice charge and a court martial. These teachers don’t want to teach in-person. End of story.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by joshuahughes on Thursday January 06, 2022 @06:27AM (#29822252)
Absolutely. I wouldn't dream of expecting anyone to do anything "at our say so", be that in-person teaching, vaccine-taking, mask-wearing, close proximity in social situations...

But this thread started with the observation that many private Catholic schools ARE just getting on with the job, and as a result parents are voting with their feet and heading there in droves. These are not teachers being forced; it's just their ideology leads them to make a different risk/benefit calculation to others.

And yet this thread is full of comments arguing that the system of endless global restrictions "works for the vast majority of people". To me and many others, that just seems like wilfully ignoring the harm to our children rather than seeking a way out.

I'm sure I don't need to link to the many MANY studies that have shown how damaging lockdowns have been to our kids' outcomes, and these negative effects hit the poorest kids the hardest. We should be doing everything within our power to undo the damage, and yet so many are willing to stick with restrictions for the foreseeable future with no exit strategy. THIS is why parents are looking for a way out for their kids, and why private schools like those mentioned above are seeing enquiries sky-rocket.

Why the hate for those who seek a return to normality? I don't understand it.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by spoonjim on Thursday January 06, 2022 @01:37AM (#29820189)
The teachers are more essential than pretty much anyone else besides doctors. They just have to show up, that's part of the deal when you take on such a big responsibility. What if doctors just stopped showing up in the middle of a pandemic? Society would be fucked. And a generation of kids is fucked because teachers weren't willing to take their responsibility seriously.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by random314 on Thursday January 06, 2022 @01:45AM (#29820224)
Teachers compensation does not reflect the dedication and mortality risk their family should accept according to you.

You get what you pay for. Your kid is your responsibility, not your teachers. If your kid "is fucked" its because you weren't willing to take their responsibility seriously - not underpaid teachers.

Your expectation that teachers should expose their families to a pandemic for 40K pa is absurd.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by spoonjim on Thursday January 06, 2022 @02:03AM (#29820323)
My kid is my responsibility but also we collectively pay the teachers and we don't have to keep doing this. We can just defund the entire system and make it an individual responsibility (of course as most things this would fuck over the poor kids the most). If there is a moment to crush the teachers unions it is now. California parents who normally would nod their heads at whatever garbage the union feeds them are probably primed to go Margaret Thatcher on their ass. I hope someone is organizing this; they have my vote.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by eropple on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:42PM (#29826794)
> we collectively pay the teachers

Poorly, in a normal environment.

Laughably, with what you are demanding they do for you.

There's a whole lot of "other people should endanger themselves for me" around this topic and it deserves some introspection.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by nradov on Thursday January 06, 2022 @01:21PM (#29827535)
Teacher salaries vary a lot by state. Some states pay quite well relative to the US median income.

https://study.com/academy/popular/teacher-salary-by-state.ht...

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by eropple on Thursday January 06, 2022 @07:36PM (#29832947)
Great. What does that have to do with anything? No state pays teachers well relative to the opportunity cost or to the resultant workload and personal investment.

And that is in normal times. Not when rich computer-toucher randoms want them to go into COVID hotboxes Because They Said So.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by dragonwriter on Thursday January 06, 2022 @01:51AM (#29820258)
> What if doctors just stopped showing up in the middle of a pandemic?

Yeah what if that happened in medicine and related fields:

https://www.modernhealthcare.com/physicians/more-docs-consid...

https://calmatters.org/health/coronavirus/2021/08/california...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ems-workers-retiring-higher-rat...

[dead]
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by torpfactory on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:24AM (#29819796)
Serious question: Where do you get that rhetoric from? There has been next to zero actual restrictions forced by the federal on lower levels of government. Most of the restrictions are decided at the city and county level and plenty don’t have any restrictions at all. And conform or die? Who is messaging that death is the penalty for not following the nonexistent restrictions?
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by codefreakxff on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:34AM (#29819875)
Wow. I really don't want see Hacker News turn into some ugly mud slinging subreddit type site. This is just wildly against the community guidelines

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by khazhoux on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:45AM (#29819929)
This POV is incongruous to me. How does one believe the federal government would benefit from additional lockdowns, when everyone is so tired of living under covid? If anything, officials who impose lockdowns only decrease their popularity, even in very Blue areas.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by yumraj on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:27AM (#29819828)
> There is no "It's your community's choice," it's "Conform or die".

Unless one lives in a walled community and there is no movement in or out of that wall, what happens in one community affects everyone.

Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by mbg721 on Thursday January 06, 2022 @12:37AM (#29819887)
Yes, and Wickard v. Filburn proves that every breath you take is interstate commerce, but that's not consistent with how Americans have historically understood, and continue to understand, liberty.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by Nasrudith on Thursday January 06, 2022 @02:57AM (#29820656)
Except historically far harsher measures were approved for epidemics. Look up Typhoid Mary.
Re:The cruel, ridiculous reality of 'virtual learning' by craftinator on Thursday January 06, 2022 @01:20AM (#29820112)
For the sake of discussion of sensitive topics, I recommend you ditch the hyperbole and stick to facts if you want to maintain credibility with reasonable people.

I don't believe anyone has tried to literally force any restrictions down your throat, nor do I believe that the feds are killing people who don't conform to restrictions. I wouldn't associate your writing with disbelief or skepticism if it didn't contain this type of hyperbole.