News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by llukas on Monday December 13, 2021 @03:03AM (#29537689)
M1 brings large customer base paying for stuff. Raspberry Pi doesn't have that big of a $$$ splash.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by MayeulC on Monday December 13, 2021 @03:45AM (#29537882)
Are you going to run Apple software on your servers? Most servers leverage the Linux ecosystem, most of which is open-source and maintained by developers who do not have big $$$.

M1 probably enables the same transition for customer-oriented, proprietary apps. But it has little to do with cloud computing, except proving that performance and ARM are not mutually exclusive, thus providing more acceptance.

Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by chrischen on Monday December 13, 2021 @04:20AM (#29538053)
A lot of stuff got prioritized for Arm/M1 compatibility... and fast as soon as the first M1 Macs released. Docker, node, in addition to Apple software.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by MayeulC on Monday December 13, 2021 @07:16AM (#29538884)
> Docker, node, in addition to Apple software.

Well, to be honest it was probably macos+M1 platform support. Docker runs a virtual machine with Linux in it on macos and windows, not sure improvements there directly translate to server workloads. I am not sure about node, but it was surely working very well on ARM before that, although it might gain some optimizations thanks to M1.

Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by dboreham on Monday December 13, 2021 @07:41AM (#29539023)
Although Node.js existed for ARM, often there wouldn't be pre-built binaries for whatever version/native dependency you needed. M1 has significantly changed that picture.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by KptMarchewa on Monday December 13, 2021 @06:26AM (#29538631)
Tons of java tools did nothing, until tickets started appearing that X does not work on my dev env.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by thecompilr on Monday December 13, 2021 @08:38AM (#29539455)
Huh? I am developing natively in macOS for a Linux server using Rust. Everything just runs fine on both. Unless I need to go really low into syscalls I have no reason to be writing and testing my code on Linux.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by the_mitsuhiko on Monday December 13, 2021 @08:43AM (#29539487)
You’re supporting that point though. A big initial move for ARM in rust was raspberry pi.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by thecompilr on Monday December 13, 2021 @09:23AM (#29539791)
The post I replied to said M1 only gonna help user applications, not servers, I claim that it helps both.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by jbverschoor on Monday December 13, 2021 @03:58AM (#29537941)
Just wait 1.5 years and enjoy the apple cloud..
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by jlawer on Monday December 13, 2021 @04:20AM (#29538055)
As someone who has worked with Apple "Enterprise" / "Business" / "Pro" products before..... I'll wait. It will start half decent, get a push to 90% of everything you need and then slowly get rewritten simplified to a level that is too basic to do any real work or just abandoned.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by dreamcompiler on Monday December 13, 2021 @09:21AM (#29539779)
Yeah no. There was a time (early 2000s) when Apple made half-decent server hardware and operating systems. Those days are over. Apple has vocally abandoned the server market, and trying to use MacOS as a server today is an exercise in futility. Too many things require the GUI, and Apple's intense focus on security theater makes everyday server operations a nightmare.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by jbverschoor on Monday December 13, 2021 @11:03AM (#29540791)
I'm not talking about macos.. I'm talking about becoming an energy efficient cloud vm provider.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by GhettoComputers on Tuesday December 14, 2021 @03:56AM (#29549655)
What is the criteria to meet energy efficient?
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by criddell on Monday December 13, 2021 @09:39AM (#29539950)
What's an example of something that requires the GUI?
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by dreamcompiler on Monday December 13, 2021 @09:53AM (#29540073)
Allowing full-disk access, turning on sshd, repeatedly clicking "OK" when you're asked "Do you want <freshly-compiled yet unsigned app> to accept incoming connections?"

If there are CLI ways to do this stuff I'd love to hear them.

Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by criddell on Monday December 13, 2021 @10:35AM (#29540492)
I think there probably are.

I know sshd is controlled through systemsetup[1].

    sudo systemsetup -setremotelogin on

[1]: https://ss64.com/osx/systemsetup.html
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by selfhoster11 on Monday December 13, 2021 @05:05AM (#29538262)
Bluntly put, I'm not gonna be running my business-critical application in Apache running off an M1 MacBook.
Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by wooger on Monday December 13, 2021 @09:07AM (#29539660)
Ha, large customer base of very expensive laptops, that's actually tiny compared to the customer base of arm servers, Rpis.

None of the paid software with a tiny userbase you're thinking of is relevant to the server market, the point is that it's free and open.