Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this ad on Google?

Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by dreamcompiler on Monday December 13, 2021 @09:21AM (#29539779)

Yeah no. There was a time (early 2000s) when Apple made half-decent server hardware and operating systems. Those days are over. Apple has vocally abandoned the server market, and trying to use MacOS as a server today is an exercise in futility. Too many things require the GUI, and Apple's intense focus on security theater makes everyday server operations a nightmare.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by jbverschoor on Monday December 13, 2021 @11:03AM (#29540791)

I'm not talking about macos.. I'm talking about becoming an energy efficient cloud vm provider.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by GhettoComputers on Tuesday December 14, 2021 @03:56AM (#29549655)

What is the criteria to meet energy efficient?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by criddell on Monday December 13, 2021 @09:39AM (#29539950)

What's an example of something that requires the GUI?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by dreamcompiler on Monday December 13, 2021 @09:53AM (#29540073)

Allowing full-disk access, turning on sshd, repeatedly clicking "OK" when you're asked "Do you want <freshly-compiled yet unsigned app> to accept incoming connections?"

If there are CLI ways to do this stuff I'd love to hear them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel seems awfully scared of Graviton2. Why pay for this... by criddell on Monday December 13, 2021 @10:35AM (#29540492)

I think there probably are.

I know sshd is controlled through systemsetup[1].

    sudo systemsetup -setremotelogin on

[1]: https://ss64.com/osx/systemsetup.html

[ Parent | on HN ]