https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/more-c...
Best online comment on the article:
"When the building's on fire, don't call the fire department or Parson will accuse you of arson.
I’ve found vulnerabilities in US government technology, and I know that the sensible and sane thing to do is just move on, ignore it, let it be someone else’s problem - I have no desire to end up in prison for being a Good Samaritan.
If some greater fool can deal with it, let them deal with it. People don’t want help. They want someone to blame.
[0] https://www.amazon.ca/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent/dp/...
FWIW, I can't remember the last time I pressed F12 ;-)
Would I be slandered and jailed for applying to this job offering by the US Gov't? What do you think Parson would have done in this situation? I did have to press F12, so this is quite the predicament! /s
[1]. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/21/biden-white-house-website-ha...
Unless they've already been convicted in the past, that is a misdemeanor.
The railroad example is more interesting, though I can't find anything truly on point. All the legislation I have seen suggests you'd 1) have to intend to disrupt the service, and 2) put something on or near the tracks. I couldn't find anything even hinting that delaying a train through normal passenger controls constituted interference with a railroad.
Even if those were all felonies, I think most people don't even lead that exciting an existence :).
Very often the conductor will let you board a train late by signalling you with hand or speaking... But disobeying the conductor's signal whistle is where you step into potential illegality, because the train might (and sometimes really will) start moving that same moment.
All of this doesn't apply to city public transport - trams, metro etc. But it does apply to trains passing through the city.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IBPeRa7U8E
If anyone is curious what the political ad looks like.
Recent developments:
- The CS professor whose expert opinion was quoted by the newspaper article is demanding an apology and legal expenses from the state, alleging that the governor defamed and violated his free speech rights.
- The governor's political fundraising committee is running ads making this a "fake news" issue.
The email that the reporter sent, in advance of publishing the article revealing the state education website's data leakage:
> “I recently discovered a significant exposure of the sensitive data of more than 100,000 teachers on a DESE website,” Renaud wrote to the agency’s communications chief, Mallory McGowin. “At this point I am confident what I found is a genuine vulnerability — I have confirmed with three teachers from different districts that their data was exposed. I also have consulted an UMSL cybersecurity researcher who verified my findings. The P-D plans to publish a story about this sensitive data exposure, but we wanted to inform DESE first so that you would have a chance to mitigate the problem.”
> Renaud shared his timeline for publishing the story and asked for interviews with officials from DESE and the Missouri Office of Administration’s Information Technology Services Division. In a second email sent about 45 minutes later, he described the steps he’d taken in finding and confirming the vulnerability.