News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reporter who told Missouri officials of website flaw did ... by dylan604 on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @03:26PM (#29099170)
Of course the GP's premise assumes that most devs are web frontend types that care about the HTML. Based on modern frontend libraries, is there really any default HTML that view source would see other than enough to load up the megabytes of JS code?
Re:Reporter who told Missouri officials of website flaw did ... by jdavis703 on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @05:08PM (#29100284)
Yes, consider the case of server side rendering. Or even companies like Basecamp that disavow single page applications. Or massive legacy ASP, PHP and Java web apps.
Re:Reporter who told Missouri officials of website flaw did ... by dylan604 on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @10:07PM (#29102917)
I said modern, and you replied back with legacy. Not sure if I'm being trolled, you're super sacrastic above my understanding, or what.
Re:Reporter who told Missouri officials of website flaw did ... by cybernautique on Thursday November 04, 2021 @06:17AM (#29105299)
Tons of modern systems built from and on top of legacy. Modern != !legacy. I can also access a lot of legacy systems through modern browsers.
Re:Reporter who told Missouri officials of website flaw did ... by jdavis703 on Thursday November 04, 2021 @08:36AM (#29106352)
We run a 2 year old frontend system with React server side rendering at work.