Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by stevehind on Saturday October 02, 2021 @10:46PM
(#28734110)
Hmm turns out trustless and decentralised might not be the best model for all financial infrastructure.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by kordlessagain on Saturday October 02, 2021 @10:53PM
(#28734136)
Rai Stones worked really well, for a long time. Well, except for the one that fell off the outrigger.
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by enkid on Sunday October 03, 2021 @12:20AM
(#28734514)
I thought it worked even better because you didn't actually have to move it anymore.
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by EdwardDiego on Sunday October 03, 2021 @01:03AM
(#28734660)
A early variant of trading gold or pork futures!
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by jazzyjackson on Sunday October 03, 2021 @01:32AM
(#28734771)
honestly I can see bitcoin ending up like this, actually transacting the bitcoins is too expensive: lets just build an accounting system where we keep a database entry of who owns a particular address
(Did I just invent the lightning network or nah?)
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by sneak on Saturday October 02, 2021 @10:56PM
(#28734151)
Good thing precisely zero people are proposing this for "all financial infrastructure".
It's an opt-in alternative, nothing more. If you don't want to use it, nothing forces you to (unlike existing retail banking).
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by MattGaiser on Saturday October 02, 2021 @10:59PM
(#28734169)
Do the people opting in truly appreciate that one software bug could empty their account?
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by TigeriusKirk on Sunday October 03, 2021 @11:43AM
(#28738034)
Most all of the people in defi do, yes. It's happened a number of times now, so you'd have to work pretty hard to understand enough to use defi but not be aware of the risks.
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by voldacar on Saturday October 02, 2021 @11:09PM
(#28734208)
People who interact with non-bitcoin crypto tend to be a lot more knowledgable about the tech and its implications than an average person. So I would say the answer is probably yes.
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by tigershark on Saturday October 02, 2021 @11:17PM
(#28734252)
Ah yes.
All the geniuses that are around the crypto subreddits for example.
Definitely Turing award level.
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by voldacar on Sunday October 03, 2021 @02:17AM
(#28734935)
I didn't say they were geniuses, just that they were more familiar with the tech and its implications than the average person. Smart contracts have been around for a while and we basically know the scope of the catastrophes that can result from bugs in smart contract code. The DAO hack was years ago. This is not a new problem space
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by omegalulw on Sunday October 03, 2021 @06:11AM
(#28735934)
This is an irrelevant point and borderline strawman. Considering the environmental impact of proof of stake blockchains, everyone is impacted whether they use crypto or not.
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by TigeriusKirk on Sunday October 03, 2021 @11:42AM
(#28738030)
The environmental impact of proof of stake blockchains is virtually nonexistent.
Re:Crypto CEO threatens customers after mistakenly sending t...
by arcticbull on Sunday October 03, 2021 @01:23AM
(#28734733)
It's mandatory in El Salvador. That alone is a QED. However, I'd highly recommend listening to any of the thought leader talking heads.