Intel’s Turnaround and the Future of Chipmaking

Re:Intel’s Turnaround and the Future of Chipmaking by simonh on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @07:31AM (#28443430)

I'm sorry, the transition to their own silicon, and the tour de force that is the M1 doesn't count as innovation? What would count? We're literally discussing the failures of an iconic chip design firm, so it's particularly ironic that you would overlook this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel’s Turnaround and the Future of Chipmaking by jacquesm on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @07:55AM (#28443582)

You mean like IBM is innovating when they use their own silicon? This is just vertical integration at its best, I'm not sure that M1 is a 'tour de force', to me it's just another CPU that was tailored for a specific niche.

The first ARM, that was a tour de force. The 6809 was too, and of course the 4004. But most other CPUs to me are run of the mill and the M1 is in that sense to me nothing special though of course it will give Apple a bit of an edge, but when all is said and done it's just another ARM based SoC.

At best it is an optimization, the most interesting part of the M1 is the dedicated neural net, and I'm not sure if anybody has already done something with that that the main CPU could not have done.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel’s Turnaround and the Future of Chipmaking by jve on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @09:35AM (#28444639)

Wow.

Intel is now chasing some design decisions within M1 with Intel Thread Director with different types of cores: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16881/a-deep-dive-into-intels...

How not M1 is not an Innovation? I'm not claiming M1 is the first CPU to do it, I don't know, but they may have executed it flawlessly. Great performance, great battery life and great silence. If you don't call it innovation, at least call it breakthrough.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel’s Turnaround and the Future of Chipmaking by ksec on Friday September 10, 2021 @04:28AM (#28479047)

>Intel is now chasing some design decisions within M1 with Intel Thread Director with different types of cores:

I have seen this being repeated again and again by DaringFireball, Gurman and many other places. It started with ARM bigLITTLE, not M1.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel’s Turnaround and the Future of Chipmaking by dralley on Wednesday September 08, 2021 @10:11PM (#28465439)

Nothing M1 did would have had an influence on what Intel is releasing now. The process of designing a chip takes years, a product that is releasing next week will have been functionally design complete a year ago.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel’s Turnaround and the Future of Chipmaking by simonh on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @08:37AM (#28443932)

IBM does a lot of research into basic chip technology and designs their own chips pushing forward with new architectures and features. Yes, of course they count. It boggles my mind that you think they wouldn't.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel’s Turnaround and the Future of Chipmaking by siva7 on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @08:08AM (#28443683)

The M1 Laptop is currently in many factors miles ahead of its competition for the general consumer market, so calling it just tailored for a specific niche isn't really true.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Intel’s Turnaround and the Future of Chipmaking by jasonlotito on Tuesday September 07, 2021 @11:11AM (#28445827)

> and the tour de force that is the M1 doesn't count as innovation?

Not really. You can't buy an M1. It's a part of a bigger product. Is the M1 impressive alone? Or is the MacBook and everything else including the M1 impressive?

And it's not the first chip Apple has done. It's just the first one for a small selection of computers. The M1 a tour de force? No.

[ Parent | on HN ]