They're opening themselves to being forced by 3 letter agencies around the world to do some really fucked up shit to their users.
Apple should never have designed something that allows for fingerprinting of files & users for stuff stored on their own device.
There is a big difference when this has been implemented & deployed to devices. Fighting questionable subpoenas and stuff becomes easier when you don't have the capability.
So apple is just outright saying it is.
Oh, I guess I should have just regurgitated the Apple press release like the gp?
> It runs only on a subset of situations...
For now. But how does that fix the problem of them using my device and my network bandwidth?
> I would be _shocked_ if this used more battery than half the crap running on devices today.
You think you'll be able to see how much it uses?
> Do you complain that Apple runs code to find moments in photos to present to you periodically...?
Yes. I hate that feature, it's a waste of my resources. I'll reminisce when I choose to, I don't need some garbage bot to troll my stuff for memories. I probably already have it disabled, or at least the notifications of it.
It runs only on a subset of situations, as previously noted - and I would be _shocked_ if this used more battery than half the crap running on devices today.
Do you complain that Apple runs code to find moments in photos to present to you periodically...?