News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by alias_neo on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @03:35AM (#27672966)
I read a Twitter thread a while back saying they use Google Analytics, but if you reject the cookie prompt it isn't loaded.

They need some sort of analytics if they want to know how the site is used, but as a Brit who uses that site I'd really rather they didn't use GA, it's not appropriate, in my opinion for a government service.

Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by the_other on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @05:26AM (#27673639)
It's never appropriate. It's a lynchpin of Google's surveillance network. The benefit they get from "giving away" the useful-but-awkward tools outweighs the benefit any GA users see from using GA. Google rigged the race before most people knew they were in it. We all should stop using it.
Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by atatatat on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @11:07AM (#27676870)
I am a CTO making these decisions, right now.

Can you point me toward a more moral path that won't make it painful for SEO contractors to work with our startup?

If there's something better, or more informative than Google Analytics, I would obviously love to choose that!

Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by tutmeister on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @01:56PM (#27679434)
I lead a government digital service and have migrated from GA out of respect for our constituents' privacy.

Umami is a great self-hosted alternative, which you can load under a subdomain to avoid it being blocked by adblockers. Most of the SaaS products end up on uBlock or other adblocker lists, even when they respect privacy, so this has been my go to option.

UserTrack is another great option we use and it continues to add great features. It's more than worth the commercial license fee. I had a conversation with Cristian by email this weekend, for example, about adding a feature. By this morning he had put together an example in their docs on how to add the feature to your site.

Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by alias_neo on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @11:18AM (#27677064)
The general consensus is "host your own", that way you're not giving more control over the web to Google by providing them the inner workings of your site via your analytics data.

There are several alternatives, you'll tend to find a lot of them advertised in the comments section here for any anti-Google Analytics post.

Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by stefanvdw1 on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @11:12AM (#27676971)
I’ve heard good things about both plausible [0] and panelbear[1] as alternatives to Google Analytics. Can’t say I have tested them personally yet unfortunately.

0. https://plausible.io 2. https://panelbear.com

Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by crtasm on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @11:30AM (#27677290)
Fully agree. Related: we noticed they have the invisible google recaptcha on the submission page for registering covid test kits.

If you have google.com blocked, instead of asking you to unblock it you just get told "we can't confirm the details you entered are genuine".

Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by alias_neo on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @11:38AM (#27677438)
I didnt know that. That's pretty disappointing. What do they expect us to do if we want to report test results but not allow Google captcha?
Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by crtasm on Tuesday June 29, 2021 @11:54AM (#27677698)
We checked the physical instructions and no other option is offered. I wonder if they even considered people might have google blocked when building the system.

Page in question: https://test-for-coronavirus.service.gov.uk/register-home-te...

Even the feedback form linked from there is "Protected by reCAPTCHA". Ridiculous.

Re:Our plans to improve navigation on Gov.uk by FerretFred on Thursday July 01, 2021 @09:12AM (#27698728)
The cookies popups are probably _the_ most annoying thing about the gov.uk experience.