People who use this or think this is a good thing have fundamentally misunderstood social interaction. Your girlfriend doesn't want the signal that you care, she wants you to actually care, and keeping in contact is an expression of caring. If you need to forge something this foundational, I'm sorry but that's not being introverted, that's treating social interaction as a game or trade. I feel like it's bordering on psychopathy.
There are a great many friends where Life Happens™ and although I genuinely care about them, I haven't contacted them in months / years (and vice versa) because I'm not generally the type to initiate small-talk. That doesn't mean I don't enjoy catching up with friends and going over the little things in our lives, it's just not something I naturally do. Having an app that helps you keep in touch with the people you care about (if you don't care why would you bother to set up an app) seems helpful.
And I think stating that this is not introversion but more like psychopathy is a bit beyond the pale. It can be hard for introverts to kickstart conversations with people they haven't talked to in a while for various reasons, none of which are "because they're a sociopath". They might feel like they're intruding or they might have confidence issues which cause them to feel that messaging people out of the blue will make them seem weird, even if neither of those things are actually true from the other person's perspective.
What person with social anxiety does that not apply to?
No idea why the two of you are quibbling over the use of the word introvert here.
To go even further, there are multiple definitions to the word in psychology, depending on what sources you rely upon (ie Jung’s, the "Big Five"’s, and probably others)
So, yes, there is a lot of room for miscommunication
I also don't see how an automated message helps you keep in touch though. It seems like people with a lot of this anxiety will just fiddle with the settings exactly like they fiddle typing out drafts they never send.
I would prefer reminders of "You haven't called your Mom in X days". Set configurable threshholds of how often you want to contact different people but still require you to actually do it.
No offense to anyone, but if you’re vocal and succesful at consuming lots of attention, it doesn’t automagically mean that your behavior is healthy.
I use a running tracker, but I still have to run myself.
And how often do people reach out on their own? Often it’s seeing a post in a feed or some other trigger. Is that more authentic?
The willingness to add a reminder and spend time shows that you care about a person.
Imagine getting a "How's life?" text from your friend when they're taking a nap in the same room.
If there's nothing deceptive about this, the app should append "This message was sent by a bot" to what it sends.
Except then no one would reply, because it's clear that you're not actually invested in talking to them at that particular time, so why should they be? They can contact you when they feel like it, not when your bot believes you two should talk.
I agree it's deceptive if the bot is making the final decision to send the message, and the message fails to make clear that it's been sent by a fully automated process.
Obvious alternative: the app could offer the user a pre-populated message. That way the system is doing more than a calendar would, but the action of sending the message is still up to the user. Looks like the app does support a variation of this:
> CommuniqAI will cleverly send text messages of your choosing to, and smartly prompt you to call and email, those that mean the most to you.
The intent of the app does appear to be to enable 'emotional fraud' though, as it seems they do aim to mislead the person being messaged (about it being an automated message). They would even want to support deceptively impersonating you for the purpose of replying, if only it were possible with current technology:
> Warning: CommuniqAI works well when used sparingly with simple messages—perhaps too well. While it’ll keep you in regular contact with those that mean the most to you, they’ll be inclined to reply back and, at this time, CommuniqAI is not intelligent enough to reply in context—so you’ll need to reply back yourself.
Here, works well is clearly referring to its ability to deceive someone into thinking the message was not sent automatically.
> Imagine getting a "How's life?" text from your friend when they're taking a nap in the same room.
A possibility, but more likely, imagine getting a How's life? text from someone you met up with yesterday.
It is very painful to lose friends you care about. It’s much worse to lose them because you made them feel unimportant by not staying in touch. An app like this could really help in that way. Just by being the nudge to start the interaction.
Just move the message into a folder too so neither of you have to waste time reading the automated message.
If you want to maintain connections with people put the effort in, that's the substance of the connection in the first place. If you don't, then don't.
People want to feel like they matter to you, so you contacting them shows that you care about them and fulfills that need. This app is a betrayal of that.
Is this connected to an article from The Onion or something? A joke?