> None of these places ran out of hospital capacity.
My wife is a hospital consultant in East London, she was working volunteer overnight shifts on Sunday nights as a nurse, back in January - working to turn over ventilated patients and run paperwork about. The hospital had 4 floor filled with Covid patients needing intensive treatment or ventilation.
Patients were being sent over 100 miles to find empty beds.
We didn't run out of hospital capacity. We came this || close to doing so.
We don't build hospitals to have excess capacity sitting around unused.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-42572116
"Hospital bosses said they had run out of beds as they battle with "very high" rates of flu."
Article from 2018. You can find the same articles from cities all around the world during regular yearly flu seasons.
COVID redefined what "running out of hospital beds" in western Europe means. So you can go on looking for articles before 2020, if you ask any professional in a hard hit area if Covid is "the same thing" as a bad season of Influenza they will tell you no.
Here's an example: in 2019 Portugal had around 500 ICU beds in the public hospital network. In February 2021 there were 900 people in ICU in Portugal just for COVID.
The point is - were lockdowns actually useful, or was it all just theatre?
Given that Sweden and Ukraine have lower COVID deaths per capita than lockdown countries, it would suggest that lockdown worsened the situation:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deat...
Portugal pursued measures like limiting opening hours which seem to have no purpose apart from concentrating people into stores at the same time.
It's actually quite easy.
If you look at the outbreak in the UK that started in November, you can see cases and hospital admissions rising rapidly before lockdown is imposed. Then in February, you can see cases falling rapidly while lockdown is still imposed.
The cases and hospitalisations are related to Covid - they don't map well onto lockdown. In fact excess deaths became negative for a while a the end of the spike, with lockdown still in effect.
Sweden 1,399.65
Denmark 431.21
Finland 170.64
Norway 146.23
> Given that Sweden and Ukraine have lower COVID deaths per capita than lockdown countries
That's simply wrong, by your own data.
You would know this to be nonsense if you knew almost anyone who works in healthcare.
I know retired health workers who were temporarily re-commissioned to deal with the total lack of staffing capacity.
Of course we can't criticise the overweight because it hurts feelings, but let's not kid ourselves it's a huge problem.
People still held private parties and you could attend bars and restaurants in speakeasy mode. I know because I did all of these things, as did many politicians.
The statistics are already available, in Ukrainian:
https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-56260505
2020: 616,000 died. 2019: 581,000. 6% increase. This mortality rate is still actually lower than in 2014 - 2010.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/525353/sweden-number-of-...
And that's after the lowest deaths in a decade in 2019, leaving a lot of 'dry tinder'.
Same thing in Ukraine, with merely superficial lockdowns, and about a 6% increase in annual deaths.
All of this is basically in line with the aging population. None of these places ran out of hospital capacity.
Governments fell short of dealing with COVID because they embraced politics and fear for something which is basically a once-a-decade flu variant, like Swine Flu or the forgotten flu waves of the 90s, 50s and 60s which lead to the same death spikes as COVID (and given populations were younger and less obese back then, were probably actually more severe).