News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Guthib by rzzzwilson on Monday February 15, 2021 @09:10PM (#26150142)
I just use the other spelling: gitlab.com .
Re:Guthib by trashcat on Wednesday February 17, 2021 @02:42PM (#26170616)
Re:Guthib by ROARosen on Monday February 15, 2021 @08:01PM (#26149764)
This is truly altruistic for the public benefit, in a way that's hard to find these days.

I'm sure you can sell the domain to GitHub for a pretty penny. Surely, after being on the front page of HN with the hundreds of clicks that will bring....

Which makes me think... Truly altruistic or smart business move?

Either way thanks and good luck!

Re:Guthib by radicalriddler on Monday February 15, 2021 @11:15PM (#26150871)
Can't they just issue a redirect, either via dns or via nginx to github.com instead of showing the page if it was truly altruistic?
Re:Guthib by core-utility on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @12:11AM (#26151154)
That could pose its own ethical issues, especially if companies start accidentally creating documentation and links to guthib.com without realizing it's redirecting them. At least this way it's clear you've made a mistake.
Re:Guthib by ibraheemdev on Monday February 15, 2021 @11:27PM (#26150943)
I doubt it was created to benefit others, it looks more like a joke to me.
Re:Guthib by ROARosen on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @12:31AM (#26151243)
My point was, I believe the person who did this is is partly - aside from the joke aspect - trying to get it at the top of HN which will cause it to have a fairly large amount of traffic, which will in turn potentially lift the price point if they offer to sell to GitHub. After all, if you can show ppl commonly make this mistake when trying to access GH (hence the large amount of traffic), it incentivizes them to buy it. That is also why there is no redirect, because that would eliminate GH's need to buy it to begin with , since the end goal is already taken care of.

And even if this is not what they intended, they should now. I believe it's actually quite a clever way to add some value to this domain.

Re:Guthib by dwohnitmok on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @05:38AM (#26152706)
As pointed out by another comment it looks like this is a joke from GitHub itself, as they own this domain.
Re:Guthib by ibraheemdev on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @08:35AM (#26153691)
I think you are referring to my comment that said guthub.com is owned by Github, not guthib.com :)
Re:Guthib by dwohnitmok on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @02:13PM (#26157584)
Ah of course, I didn't notice it was the same person.
Re:Guthib by RicoElectrico on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @12:31PM (#26156383)
I remember that hitgub.com presented an animation which swapped the letters of the logo and redirected to github.com. But whoever owned the domain must have forgotten to renew it and now it serves some generic parked-domain page (without scammy ads, though).

There's a copy archived: http://web.archive.org/web/20130212130417/http://hitgub.com/

Re:Guthib by andreareina on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @05:27AM (#26152658)
Re:Guthib by bitwize on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @12:21AM (#26151201)
Re:Guthib by llimos on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @07:52AM (#26153389)
I love how that site has a PWA manifest. Just in case you want to install it, for looking something up later.
Re:Guthib by byhemechi on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @06:34PM (#26160263)
Re:Guthib by ChrisArchitect on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @11:39AM (#26155716)
suspicions about selling it to github (who probably owns it) aside: this is from a long time ago (4-10 years) so don't harp on no HTTPS or redirects heh
Re:Guthib by ChrisArchitect on Wednesday February 17, 2021 @09:47AM (#26166831)
confirmed from a guy that this was set up by a random as a joke in 2010 and nothing more to it. A lesson in keeping every domain you own forever and ever haha
Re:Guthib by ibraheemdev on Monday February 15, 2021 @10:16PM (#26150518)
guthub.com seems to be owned by GitHub.
Re:Guthib by mastrsushi on Monday February 15, 2021 @11:19PM (#26150890)
Something about the fact that they don't even bother to provide a redirect adds to the charm.
Re:Guthib by p4l4g4 on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @06:11AM (#26152865)
Nice! Shame it shows 404 when accessing sub directories.
Re:Guthib by m463 on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @02:26AM (#26151713)
and a 151 byte web page...
Re:Guthib by PhillyG on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @11:15AM (#26155326)
8 lines of code total, 9 if you include the empty line at the end. I didn't know you could put so few tags and have it render. No <body> or even <html>, that's quite impressive
Re:Guthib by ArcMex on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @08:14AM (#26153520)
Got a good chuckle out of me.