ROARosen
Just because you or anyone working there doesn't see a useful use case for using that functionality over the API doesn't mean there won't be someone who will come up with something useful based on that in the future.
While it's true that volatile-pay work is extremely stressful, this seems like a cherry-picked study to be able to write a flashy headline to people rightly concerned over a hot-button issue. They could have just as easily just said that volatile pay causes anxiety and stress, which IMHO you don't need a study for, just like we don't need a study saying that eating less increases hunger symptoms.
Anxiety and stress itself is a well-known cause of all these above issues, and there are a multitude of other work-related stresses than just volatile pay.
I'm not referring to keeping any particular API endpoint alive. The problem you raise can be easily mitigated with a correctly built-out API versioning system and - more importantly - API deprecation policy.
I'm referring to just API coverage of platform features. In that sense maintaining API's can be viewed as not much different than maintaining the actual platform features themselves. Obviously the more feature you provide the more maintenance/resources will be required. That goes for both API's and the features themselves.
For instance I'm in the process of building a VScode and browser extension that would automatically star repo's of all npm packages and linked scripts used in your code (including dependencies). I think that's a basic gratitude thing for myself, and a tool some people might be interested in.
I really don't get this. What exactly is the risk? If they don't need it why do they need to make sure no one else gets it?
Under President Arafat, the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority adopted the 2003 Amended Basic Law, which stipulates Islam as the sole official religion in Palestine and the principles of Islamic sharia as a principal source of legislation. The draft Constitution contains the same provisions. The draft Constitution was formulated by a Constitutional Committee, established by Arafat in 1999 and endorsed by the PLO.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organizat...
Not the other way around.
Why shouldn't payment for work be tied to local price ranges and cost of living?
Not entirely true. If you're looking to code that "resembles code that can run in the browser" without that much "magic", Vue has an interface for directly declaring render functions, also for the possibility of using JSX.
See doc here: https://vuejs.org/guide/extras/render-function.html
Why did they store PII, Identity documents unencrypted?
What exactly was the reason for this breach?
Why did it take VPNOverview's team a day to notify them?
What did VPNOverview do with all that data until they notified Grink and afterwards?
Why did it take Grink 22 days to secure the files?
Why does the article describe the above as "as swiftly as possible"?
Can Grink be fined/sued over this, or is that only possible once there is 'actual damage' proven?
True, I'm going a little out on a limb here but IMHO makes total sense.
Since Twitter is - in Musk's words - the “de facto public town square” - it doesn't make sense for it to be a private company at all (which is much less open to outside scrutiny and/or criticisms).
Which is kind of an oxymoron given the fact that the changes he supposedly wants to implement will only be possible if he takes it private.
All of this leads me to believe he might just implement the changes he wants and promptly go public again, keeping control of the board or as CEO (prob also at a much higher eval). This, or maybe he'll turn it into a nonprofit.
Its true that the public had little say in that regard till now but at least this buyout threat shows that it is "possible" to stand up to whatever decisions their board makes.
As an aside, I doubt people and governments would have the same confidence in Twitter were it a private company, which leaves me to believe that this whole buyoff thingy is just a power play by Musk to gain some power over the board without actually joining the board.
The way I understand it, they believed it was best for twitter (since as a fiduciary he would 'have to act in the interests of the company)
You can just move your DENO_DIR (cache) along with the rest of your code the same way you can move your node_modules folder.
That's totally true but only if you are an employee, the business owner should have total access.
I don't see how a free GSuite account - where you are the business owner - is any less yours than a free gmail account.
For online banks, I only got to them online by which automatically means I have their correct domain name.
The question of how I get the online bank's domain name to begin with does not really come in to this conversation, can be an ad, a friend etc.