Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by Waterluvian on Monday August 17, 2020 @02:54PM
(#24190516)
This has me really curious about a bigger topic: “what are some massive wartime expenditures (money, resources, attention) that ended up being completely ineffective?”
Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by KineticLensman on Monday August 17, 2020 @03:32PM
(#24190937)
Soviet anti-tank dogs [0] in WW2. Although in truth the expenditure wasn't massive.
> the Soviets used their own diesel engine tanks to train the dogs rather than German tanks which had gasoline engines.[5] As the dogs relied on their acute sense of smell, the dogs sought out familiar Soviet tanks instead of strange-smelling German tanks
Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by emmelaich on Monday August 17, 2020 @07:29PM
(#24193522)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-Automatic_Ground_Environm...
Cost billions; more than the Manhattan project. Obsolete soon after deployment due to ICBMs.
(Taking your "war time" to include cold war time)
Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by hawk_ on Monday August 17, 2020 @05:20PM
(#24192279)
My favorite example of this is the Spruce Goose.
Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by snowwrestler on Tuesday August 18, 2020 @04:56PM
(#24204245)
The canonical example is probably the Maginot Line--to such an extent that it became a general metaphor for that sort of thing.
Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by gresrun on Monday August 17, 2020 @07:45PM
(#24193626)
Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by pjc50 on Monday August 17, 2020 @04:20PM
(#24191551)
Most of the German "wunderwaffe", really. The V2 programme killed more during its manufacture than it did as targets.
Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by Negitivefrags on Monday August 17, 2020 @05:14PM
(#24192198)
There is a comedic book on this called "My Tank is Fight"
Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by mcguire on Monday August 17, 2020 @03:50PM
(#24191190)
On the other hand, dazzle did make the crew feel better. And the ships had to be painted anyway....
Re:Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large c...
by andbberger on Monday August 17, 2020 @11:17PM
(#24194898)
Dazzle arguably made incidence range finders more effective, providing more edges to align.
Dazzle fundamentally failed at this task because the primary opponent, Imperial Germany, did not use coincidence rangefinders. Instead, they used stereoscopic rangefinders, against which Dazzle had little effect. (Incidentally, the Germans also went to war with a naval camouflage paint scheme that was best designed to defeat their own instruments, and was notably less effective against the Royal Navy.)