Why is the userland so bad in comparison? are they employing much worse developers to take care of the windows explorer/search/browser side of things? it is true that if you really try to pay attention you will notice many quirks and bugs here and there in the user interface interactions, with the start menu search being such a horribly visible offender (also bugs in the explorer search box).
Microsoft managed to make a uniform looking user interface for both win9x and XP/Vista/7, why are they having so much trouble with Windows 10 control panels?
It's also incredibly bloated. Gone are the days when a few gigabytes would be enough for your Windows partition.
The Microsoft Teams chat application uses 200MB to 550MB of RAM when idle.
My all-time favourite example of high-density software is Super Mario 64, which weighs in at 8MB.
Of course, a great deal of effort must have gone into squeezing it down to 8MB, and it wouldn't be reasonable to ask modern developers to go to those lengths, but still.
I open up the start menu, type 'vlc', and get no matches. I close the menu, reopen it, and try again. This time, it finds VLC no problem.
They've had almost 5 years to fix this.