Re:What the Nurses See
by MyHypatia on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @10:51AM
(#22749181)
Right now doctors and nurses are being fired by their hospitals for speaking publicly about lack of PPE. You would think that whistle-blower protection, freedom of speech, or occupational safety laws would prevent this from happening. But now that we need medical staff more than ever, hospitals are firing them for alerting the public. Is there anything that can be done about this?
Re:What the Nurses See
by nradov on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @11:25AM
(#22749623)
For employees in California the Schoech law firm will provide free initial consultations and potentially take cases on a contingency basis. I can recommend them as a previous client on an unrelated matter.
Re:What the Nurses See
by GuB-42 on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @11:39AM
(#22749787)
Do you have any source for that? It sounds insane.
Hospitals need all the workforce they can get. No matter what they do now, during the pandemic, there will be no shortage of patients. And I suppose it is in their best financial interest to treat as many as possible, and it means a lot of personnel.
Having it the other around makes a lot more sense: doctor doesn't feel safe because of a lack of PPE, refuses to work, gets fired, complains about it. If that's the situation, it is not about whistle-blowing, it is about the right to stop working if the conditions aren't safe. Both are (or should be) basic workers rights, but these are very different things.
The relevant quote: "Ming Lin, an emergency room physician in Washington state, said he was told Friday he was out of a job because he’d given an interview to a newspaper about a Facebook post detailing what he believed to be inadequate protective equipment and testing. In Chicago, a nurse was fired after emailing colleagues that she wanted to wear a more protective mask while on duty. In New York, the NYU Langone Health system has warned employees they could be terminated if they talk to the media without authorization."
Re:What the Nurses See
by AS126 on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @01:40PM
(#22751409)
If this is true, it's absolutely insane! There's a global pandemic, medical staff is overwhelmed psychically and mentally. It seems there is no justice for them. They should be praised and helped by authorities, understood by all people. Yet, I'm reading about doctors and nurses being fired for speaking out their safety concerns.
Re:What the Nurses See
by LorenPechtel on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @01:31PM
(#22751306)
No. The regulators aren't going to do anything about a hospital that doesn't have enough staff these days. There's no downside for a hospital to fire someone for speaking up, but letting them get away with speaking up is asking for malpractice suits.
Re:What the Nurses See
by dfxm12 on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @12:42PM
(#22750667)
You would think that whistle-blower protection, freedom of speech, or occupational safety laws would prevent this from happening.
Just as a stop sign doesn't physically make your car stop at an intersection, a law won't prevent someone from firing someone else illegally. A fired employee can bring bring a wrongful termination suit, but the recently fired rarely have the means to see these through, even in the best of times. Employers know this.
Re:What the Nurses See
by MyHypatia on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @01:21PM
(#22751173)
Does this qualify as "wrongful termination"? Is it actually illegal for hospitals to fire medical staff for publicly voicing concerns about lack of PPE? That is what I am wondering.
Re:What the Nurses See
by wool_gather on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @01:19PM
(#22751138)
This is entirely not true when discussing the conditions of work: see the National Labor Relations Act. Nor is it strictly true for speech that takes place outside the workplace.
> Nor is it strictly true for speech that takes place outside the workplace.
You are nominally correct. However, if I am your employer and I want to fire you I can almost certainly come up with some legitimate reason to put on the record. Your only recourse will be to file a wrongful termination suit and try to prove that the real reason I fired you was something other than what I said it was. Good luck with that.
Also, if you're in an at-will state, I don't even have to come up with an excuse. If I want you gone, you're gone.
Re:What the Nurses See
by jpalomaki on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @01:53PM
(#22751554)
Should understand why the hospitals are worried about this kind of comments.
Are they afraid of lawsuits? These kind of statements could look bad in the court. You go to hospital for some standard procedure, then get covid, then sue the hospital for not taking proper precautions.
Re:What the Nurses See
by gentleman11 on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @03:17PM
(#22752537)
There is a story going around blaming the Chinese government for concealing numbers, but in the West private industry is stepping up to the job of concealing equipment shortages.
Re:What the Nurses See
by fortran77 on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @12:32PM
(#22750552)
BTW: The WSJ is running a "2 Months for $1/month, cancel anytime offer". With all the news happening, it's worth to pay the $1 for two months, and set a reminder in your calendar for May 31st to cancel the subscription so you don't get billed the normal rate on June 1st.
Re:What the Nurses See
by James_Henry on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @11:58AM
(#22750073)
Something that this article doesn't seem to completely answer is, How much of this is the incompetence of the Montefiore system and how much was inevitable? or maybe, Is Montefiore different?
I sure hope that their irresponsible handling of the Feb 3rd case (and subsequent cases) is an exception to what hospitals have been doing. Yes, people weren't generally as aware of the disease on Feb 3rd, but healthcare workers definitely should have been (and from what I've seen quite a few were).
I feel like a lot of the variation in covid-19 outcomes is going to come from the competence of hospital administration.
Re:What the Nurses See
by buboard on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @11:23AM
(#22749601)
What can tech do to help healthcare workers monitor their patients with minimal interaction? They are disproportionately affected and can even become virus vectors for spread.
Re:What the Nurses See
by nradov on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @12:14PM
(#22750294)
Technology for remote monitoring of patient vital signs and medical device status is already widely deployed. Most wards in modern hospitals feed all that data to a central station so that a single nurse can monitor multiple patients simultaneously. However healthcare providers still have to directly touch patients several times per day for cleaning and treatment, especially in the ICU.
They print their own visors in Stockholm and distribute them to hospitals. They also act as a hub for amateurs that can help print, and companies with 3D printers with spare capacity, so that the hospitals have a single point of contact. I don't have any more details than what's said on the page.
Re:What the Nurses See
by umanwizard on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @01:47PM
(#22751474)
The 30 teams in MLB are by far the best in the world, and have many players from every country where baseball is popular.
If the English Premier League were so dominant that it were nearly impossible for any team from any other league to compete with them, it wouldn't really bother me if they called their winner the World Champion soccer club.
Re:What the Nurses See
by umanwizard on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @11:48AM
(#22749932)
The US is objectively not the greatest country in the world. We are at a very high level of development on some metrics, and a medium-to-high level on others, but certainly not uniformly #1.
Re:What the Nurses See
by irq11 on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @12:37PM
(#22750625)
I’m seeing quotes like this regularly in the “interviews with nurses” genre of reporting:
”Many nurses and doctors have symptoms, like dry coughs, but are being denied tests and remain working, Ms. Norstein and other Montefiore health-care workers said colleagues have told them.”
This isn’t even second-hand information - it’s third-hand, and it’s irresponsible journalism. If the reporter couldn’t directly confirm the rumors, they could just say “there are rumors that...”
But then, this is buried in the article:
” One patient with confirmed coronavirus stayed in the Moses ER for over 14 hours and used the same bathroom as other patients, Mr. Mathew wrote in a March 14 email to the hospital epidemiologist and an environmental health and safety director. He said he received no response.”
That is just incompetence, and it’s documented. Why did the reporter bury the lede?
Re:What the Nurses See
by James_Henry on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @01:02PM
(#22750932)
This is what I'm wondering, too. Montefiore botched their first case on Feb 3rd and then weeks later was still ending up with coronavirus patients potentially contaminating others in ways that should not have happened. This is more than just a lack of PPE and other equipment (which could be partly due to hospital administration incompetence too).
https://norcallawfirm.com/2020/03/31/essential-employees-hav...
Hospitals need all the workforce they can get. No matter what they do now, during the pandemic, there will be no shortage of patients. And I suppose it is in their best financial interest to treat as many as possible, and it means a lot of personnel.
Having it the other around makes a lot more sense: doctor doesn't feel safe because of a lack of PPE, refuses to work, gets fired, complains about it. If that's the situation, it is not about whistle-blowing, it is about the right to stop working if the conditions aren't safe. Both are (or should be) basic workers rights, but these are very different things.
The relevant quote: "Ming Lin, an emergency room physician in Washington state, said he was told Friday he was out of a job because he’d given an interview to a newspaper about a Facebook post detailing what he believed to be inadequate protective equipment and testing. In Chicago, a nurse was fired after emailing colleagues that she wanted to wear a more protective mask while on duty. In New York, the NYU Langone Health system has warned employees they could be terminated if they talk to the media without authorization."
Just as a stop sign doesn't physically make your car stop at an intersection, a law won't prevent someone from firing someone else illegally. A fired employee can bring bring a wrongful termination suit, but the recently fired rarely have the means to see these through, even in the best of times. Employers know this.
Applies only to the government. Your employer can restrict your speech -- and pretty much any aspect of your private life -- however they wish.
The NLRA is pretty much toothless nowadays.
https://jalopnik.com/the-tesla-firings-were-about-unionizing...
https://medium.com/@GoogleWalkout/google-fired-us-for-organi...
> Nor is it strictly true for speech that takes place outside the workplace.
You are nominally correct. However, if I am your employer and I want to fire you I can almost certainly come up with some legitimate reason to put on the record. Your only recourse will be to file a wrongful termination suit and try to prove that the real reason I fired you was something other than what I said it was. Good luck with that.
Also, if you're in an at-will state, I don't even have to come up with an excuse. If I want you gone, you're gone.
Are they afraid of lawsuits? These kind of statements could look bad in the court. You go to hospital for some standard procedure, then get covid, then sue the hospital for not taking proper precautions.
Good quality news though.
I sure hope that their irresponsible handling of the Feb 3rd case (and subsequent cases) is an exception to what hospitals have been doing. Yes, people weren't generally as aware of the disease on Feb 3rd, but healthcare workers definitely should have been (and from what I've seen quite a few were).
I feel like a lot of the variation in covid-19 outcomes is going to come from the competence of hospital administration.
https://crooked.com/podcast/emergency-room-a-dispatch-from-t...
The interview starts at 6 minutes if you want to skip over the intro. Alternate link:
https://overcast.fm/+UT25k518U/06:08
There's this for 3D printing protective visors:
https://3dverkstan.se/protective-visor/
They print their own visors in Stockholm and distribute them to hospitals. They also act as a hub for amateurs that can help print, and companies with 3D printers with spare capacity, so that the hospitals have a single point of contact. I don't have any more details than what's said on the page.
Sure we can and should ramp up production but that takes time and effort. So who gets it in the meantime?
I think more precise would be to say “the country that thinks of itself as the greatest country in the world”.
If the English Premier League were so dominant that it were nearly impossible for any team from any other league to compete with them, it wouldn't really bother me if they called their winner the World Champion soccer club.
Heck, they don't even have their own country code for dialing...
”Many nurses and doctors have symptoms, like dry coughs, but are being denied tests and remain working, Ms. Norstein and other Montefiore health-care workers said colleagues have told them.”
This isn’t even second-hand information - it’s third-hand, and it’s irresponsible journalism. If the reporter couldn’t directly confirm the rumors, they could just say “there are rumors that...”
But then, this is buried in the article:
” One patient with confirmed coronavirus stayed in the Moses ER for over 14 hours and used the same bathroom as other patients, Mr. Mathew wrote in a March 14 email to the hospital epidemiologist and an environmental health and safety director. He said he received no response.”
That is just incompetence, and it’s documented. Why did the reporter bury the lede?
If hospitals were/are driving infection counts in the Bronx, that’s a huge story, and deserves more attention.