Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In...
by jl6 on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @07:45AM
(#21824236)
And you found out about it how?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In...
by thaumasiotes on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @08:46AM
(#21824701)
The idea that there are groups of people communicating with each other privately doesn't really need a lot of evidence. It's 100% likely to be true.
A better question would be "why do you think these specific people are coordinating with each other?".
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In...
by coralreef on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @04:43PM
(#21829783)
It's 100% likely to be true.
Uhh citation required
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In...
by thaumasiotes on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @05:13PM
(#21830026)
What do you want a citation for? I personally communicate in private groups, and so do you.
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In...
by coralreef on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @11:27PM
(#21832003)
Well it just seems like you pulled a number out of your ass to support a statement that you're trying to backup
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In...
by thaumasiotes on Thursday December 19, 2019 @12:27AM
(#21832184)
The number is perfectly accurate. It isn't even possible for all communication to take place in public. So I have to ask again... what is it that you think needs a citation?
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In...
by coralreef on Thursday December 19, 2019 @08:34PM
(#21841045)
You just said some set of facts is 100% true and accurate on the basis that it is rumoured to have occurred in a private conversation of which no one can validate. This is problematic.
Example: I know for a fact that 9/11 was inside job. I communicate in a private think group, so you can take my word for its truth.