News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in Insider Trading Ring. Parent comment

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by coralreef on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @04:43PM (#21829783)
It's 100% likely to be true.

Uhh citation required

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by thaumasiotes on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @05:13PM (#21830026)
What do you want a citation for? I personally communicate in private groups, and so do you.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by coralreef on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @11:27PM (#21832003)
Well it just seems like you pulled a number out of your ass to support a statement that you're trying to backup
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by thaumasiotes on Thursday December 19, 2019 @12:27AM (#21832184)
The number is perfectly accurate. It isn't even possible for all communication to take place in public. So I have to ask again... what is it that you think needs a citation?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by coralreef on Thursday December 19, 2019 @08:34PM (#21841045)
You just said some set of facts is 100% true and accurate on the basis that it is rumoured to have occurred in a private conversation of which no one can validate. This is problematic.

Example: I know for a fact that 9/11 was inside job. I communicate in a private think group, so you can take my word for its truth.

[ Parent | on HN ]