Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in Insider Trading Ring

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by malux85 on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @07:30AM (#21824145)

I just told you, the communication dark pools.

It’s not open to the public, you need a shibboleth

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by jl6 on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @07:45AM (#21824236)

And you found out about it how?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by thaumasiotes on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @08:46AM (#21824701)

The idea that there are groups of people communicating with each other privately doesn't really need a lot of evidence. It's 100% likely to be true.

A better question would be "why do you think these specific people are coordinating with each other?".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by coralreef on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @04:43PM (#21829783)

It's 100% likely to be true.

Uhh citation required

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by thaumasiotes on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @05:13PM (#21830026)

What do you want a citation for? I personally communicate in private groups, and so do you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by coralreef on Wednesday December 18, 2019 @11:27PM (#21832003)

Well it just seems like you pulled a number out of your ass to support a statement that you're trying to backup

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by thaumasiotes on Thursday December 19, 2019 @12:27AM (#21832184)

The number is perfectly accurate. It isn't even possible for all communication to take place in public. So I have to ask again... what is it that you think needs a citation?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by coralreef on Thursday December 19, 2019 @08:34PM (#21841045)

You just said some set of facts is 100% true and accurate on the basis that it is rumoured to have occurred in a private conversation of which no one can validate. This is problematic.

Example: I know for a fact that 9/11 was inside job. I communicate in a private think group, so you can take my word for its truth.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Silicon Valley IT Administrator and Friends Charged in In... by malux85 on Thursday December 19, 2019 @01:56AM (#21832642)

I built the infrastructure they use to communicate

[ Parent | on HN ]