News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by Mountain_Skies on Saturday November 16, 2019 @06:30AM (#21552115)
Are corporate open source contributions the new blood money?
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by pjmlp on Saturday November 16, 2019 @07:43AM (#21552387)
Linux would hardly gotten where it is without the contributions from everyone getting paychecks from IBM, Intel, Oracle, NVidia, AMD, Apple, Sony, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Huawei, Samsung among many others.

Which is kind of ironic, hate them, but then willing accepting whatever comes from them, 'cause hey it is free.

Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by xiphias2 on Saturday November 16, 2019 @10:54AM (#21553224)
You could also say that Google wouldn't have gotten anywhere without Linux, as they really depended on lots of cheap hardware and software. Humans are connected, which is a great thing (that what makes us human).
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by pjmlp on Sunday November 17, 2019 @02:26AM (#21556948)
Sure, I guess hating them today, and tomorrow gladly accepting whatever they release 'cause its gratis, is also human behaviour.
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by shrimp_emoji on Saturday November 16, 2019 @03:17PM (#21554694)
pjmlp: Bad People Can't Do Good Things Andy
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by pjmlp on Sunday November 17, 2019 @02:23AM (#21556943)
They certainly can do good things and even change.

What is schizophrenic is having a community that hates big corporations, but happily takes anything they decide to offer,

Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by russler23 on Sunday November 17, 2019 @08:30PM (#21561252)
There are many conflations in these statements of yours, but one of the more offensive is that corporations are responsible for an individual's open-source contributions because that individual draws a paycheck for something else. What's the corporate equivalent of a bootlicker? An NDA-licker?
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by pjmlp on Monday November 18, 2019 @02:17AM (#21562495)
What I don't get is how someone can hate companies like Oracle, wish that they would disapeer out of the face of the earth, and at the same time jump of joy when a couple of lines get added to the Linux kernel, by the corporation they want to nuke.
Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by ferzul on Sunday November 17, 2019 @05:14AM (#21557281)
if they offer it under gpl, it's no poison chalice. why do i care who does the right thing? what's good is good.

i would be more worried when they propose that we all abandon this adequate gpl tool for this permissive licensed code they seriously didn't write, but here's ten fantastic contributions they made.

Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by pjmlp on Monday November 18, 2019 @02:20AM (#21562503)
It is not about being a posion chalice, rather the attitude of wanting to nuke company X, while accepting whatever it gives as gratis contributions.

I only see that among FOSS folks, seldom among other kinds of activism.

Re:Supreme Court to Hear Google-Oracle Copyright Fight by monocasa on Monday November 18, 2019 @12:44PM (#21566331)
Because of the nature of the GPL. You don't get those guarantees in most other forms of activism.