News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Slack was down by timdorr on Monday July 29, 2019 @11:29AM (#20555580)
They actually just fixed that in 4.0: https://slackhq.com/introducing-a-more-efficient-slack-deskt...

I'm currently sitting at 400MB total usage (including helpers) for 4 workspaces.

Re:Slack was down by MisterTea on Monday July 29, 2019 @11:49AM (#20555834)
400MB? Not bad for a chat client that sends a few bytes of text.
Re:Slack was down by SergeAx on Monday July 29, 2019 @12:38PM (#20556468)
Still 10 times more compared to Telegram) Not to mention transfer speed and bandwith usage.
Re:Slack was down by timdorr on Monday July 29, 2019 @04:18PM (#20558923)
This is on my Mac, whose apps aren't exactly known for memory efficiency.

Fantastical, a calendaring app, is sitting at 333MB.

1Password is taking up 168MB in the background.

Finder, which I don't even have a window open for, is eating 127MB.

I'm not saying 400MB is amazing or anything, but it's a significant drop from the gigs of memory wasted by previous versions.

Re:Slack was down by user5994461 on Monday July 29, 2019 @01:18PM (#20556950)
Aren't your coworkers sharing 10 MB gifs all day long?
Re:Slack was down by qrbLPHiKpiux on Monday July 29, 2019 @01:33PM (#20557112)
The reason I don't like twitter because of all the dumb reaction gifs.
Re:Slack was down by dymk on Monday July 29, 2019 @01:44PM (#20557237)
Still can't blame the browser when it consumes a gigabyte of ram, when we ask it to show us a gigabyte of gifs
Re:Slack was down by Aaargh20318 on Monday July 29, 2019 @11:44AM (#20555771)
400MB for what basically is a client for a proprietary version of IRC is ridiculous. How much memory did BitchX use ?
Re:Slack was down by mr__y on Monday July 29, 2019 @12:06PM (#20556034)
while I don't remember how much memory did BitchX use, I do remember that a whopping 8 megs of ram was enough to run mIRC with 20+ channel tabs without serious glitches. And those precious megs were used not only for the irc client but also for the OS itself.
Re:Slack was down by bluedino on Monday July 29, 2019 @12:35PM (#20556424)
I have irssi reporting 25232 mem used
Re:Slack was down by xeromal on Monday July 29, 2019 @11:40AM (#20555719)
Half a gig for IRC + gifs
Re:Slack was down by asark on Monday July 29, 2019 @11:43AM (#20555752)
Seriously. Oh, good, now it's only 4-5x as large as it has any right to be, even allowing for modern software bloat...
Re:Slack was down by allana on Monday July 29, 2019 @11:44AM (#20555765)
Such is the nature of slightly optimized Electron apps, T-Mobile Digits Desktop app is a similar resource hog.

Using the browser based version often is less resource intensive.

Re:Slack was down by lugg on Monday July 29, 2019 @01:14PM (#20556911)
Tried that, they actively employ darkpatterns to coerce users onto desktop apps. I even asked them to stop asking for an app install on their links that you open from inside the webapp and they told me to get stuffed and use the desktop app.
Re:Slack was down by allana on Monday July 29, 2019 @01:30PM (#20557090)
Yea, I use Matrix integration when I deal with Slack, that way I have my choice of client and there isn't any code of Slack's running on my machine.
Re:Slack was down by KORraN on Monday July 29, 2019 @04:26PM (#20559036)
Strange, after declining message about "native" desktop app, I've never seen it again. No other issues as well. Firefox 69 on Windows, one paid and one free workspace.
Re:Slack was down by allana on Monday July 29, 2019 @11:42AM (#20555743)
How is CPU and I/O use on the newest version?
Re:Slack was down by mh- on Monday July 29, 2019 @01:31PM (#20557092)
About the same, for my usage.
Re:Slack was down by allana on Monday July 29, 2019 @03:14PM (#20558278)
Ooof, I'd hope they would have improved CPU use when handling lots of GIFs. Tusky and Mastodon's web frontend handle pausing offscreen GIFs pretty well, my fan doesn't spin up at all (unlike Slack's desktop client last I used it).