News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cities and Ambition by coglethorpe on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @06:02PM (#201464)
I've noticed messages as well:

Gary, IN: Lock the doors. Do not stop.

Macon, GA: You know, Atlanta is just up the road, right?

Elko, NV: The only winners are the house and the mine owners.

Milwaukee, WI: Fourth place is just fine, given enough beer.

Clearly, I need to hang out in better cities.

Re:Cities and Ambition by benmathes on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @08:39AM (#201998)
Garberville, CA: Hey, man, you should give to the community and help me get some weed.

Wolfeboro, NH (smalltown New England summer resort): You should pretend it's 1962 like all the retirees do.

Waltham, MA (Brandeis University): Go back to NYC when you graduate.

Cambridge, MA: You should be more educated.

I chose "educated" over "intelligent" largely because I lived closer to Harvard. When I go to the MIT side of Cambridge I would switch the two. In and around Harvard you see a strong vein of people who aim for the prestige of higher education over the knowledge it brings.

The middle-aged people dream of sitting in a musky study debating high-falutin mish-mash over a nice port. The college-aged kids dream of sitting in a coffee shop debating their PHIL101 papers. They seek _established_ education.

I know this doesn't speak for every aspect of Cambridge, which I did love living in for a few years, but the too-strong emphasis on the appearance of education as opposed to the knowledge you gain helped me move to take a job in San Mateo (shameless plug: RockYou.com).

Disclaimer: I am not your average anything. My move to San Mateo from Cambridge is via Vietnam, Cambodia, and Thailand. I speak Mandarin but I'm English/German. Take what I said with a healthy grain of wacky salt.

Re:Cities and Ambition by nabeel on Sunday August 03, 2008 @03:20PM (#265679)
The only place I've had that feeling that "education" was more important than knowledge in Cambridge was actually directly on the Harvard campus. But I completely agree.

There are two strains of culture in Cambridge, "you should be smarter" which is why I love living here. And "you should have two PHDs" -- which is very different and unfortunate message. It's almost the opposite of the Valley, which speaks so reverently of the Harvard drop-out.

The best thing that those of us who live in Cambridge could do is keep the culture focused on ideas and less on diplomas.

Re:Cities and Ambition by muhfuhkuh on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @07:51PM (#201573)
Okay, me too.

Columbia SC: Uh, the culture is pretty much centered around it's mid-tier University of South Carolina, which is a party-hardy Frat/Sorority vibe. So, I guess it says "YEEE-HAAAAW! More beer, Bo!"

Hartford, CT: Unless you can calculate the death of a 55 year old smoker with no major medical history within a margin of error, the city says "There's NY below and Boston above, take your pick, pay your toll, and have a nice day."

Raleigh-Durham, NC: Duke University, UNC, Wake Forrest, North Carolina State, Shaw, and various other colleges all within around 20 interstate exits of each other. I guess it would say "study hard, and find job at IBM, Sony-Ericsson, or Cisco." Not too much entreprenurial spirit here, I guess because the tech giants gobble them up with nice offers right out of college.

Re:Cities and Ambition by earthboundkid on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @06:45AM (#201948)
My friends live in West Columbia, and I think they're trying to build a hip scene out there, but it's hard going.

I live in Honolulu. It's a miracle that I make it out of bed in the afternoon.

Re:Cities and Ambition by aston on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @10:43PM (#201710)
Wow, SC people hang out here? Sweet.

Columbia, SC doesn't really send any strong messages. Only the young people in the area have anything to do with USC, normally, so not even the frattiness comes across that strong.

College football tailgating, however, is a state-wide sport.

Re:Cities and Ambition by SwellJoe on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @06:40AM (#201946)
aston, are you from SC? I'm from Greenville (which sends the message, "How can we be more like Atlanta?", or at least it did when I last lived there 14 years ago). Small world.

The message in Charleston definitely has something about aristocracy and the value of old money, while the message in the rest of the coastal towns generally involves fishing. Except Myrtle Beach, where the message is, "Y'all come on down for a visit, and leave your money when you head back up north."

Re:Cities and Ambition by earthboundkid on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @06:46AM (#201949)
Went to Furman, agreed.

Visited Bob Jones as a kid -- "You know you're going to hell, right?"

Re:Cities and Ambition by SwellJoe on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @06:54AM (#201954)
Weird. I lived three blocks from Furman. It was my playground, growing up. We played video games in the student center using change fished out of the fountain beside it, flirted embarrassingly with the college girls, skateboarded and biked all over, and regularly got kicked out after the campus closed for the day (for those unfamiliar with small Southern Baptist liberal arts schools, or at least Furman, they close all of the gates except the main gate at 10PM and only allow students in).

Speaking of Bob Jones, no one ever believes me when I explain that it has a "date room", wherein couples sit together in a chaperoned room, with a Bible-width space in between. Which explains why Bob Jones girls are such a terror when they do manage to escape the watchful eyes of the school.

Re:Cities and Ambition by ssanders82 on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @08:57PM (#201630)
Clemson SC: Aren't we all glad we don't live in Columbia! More beer, Bo!
Re:Cities and Ambition by edw519 on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @07:07PM (#201528)
"your best best is probably to try living in several places when you're young"

I have, and here's what they've said to me:

Pittsburgh: You should be nice.

New Jersey: You should be in New York.

Los Angeles: You should go outside.

Phoenix: You should go inside.

Detroit: You should be glad you have a good job.

Tampa: You should buy a new pair of flip flops for dinner Saturday night.

Re:Cities and Ambition by jimbokun on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @10:00PM (#201683)
"Pittsburgh: You should be nice."

Being a native Western Pennsylvania, and living more of my adult life in Pittsburgh than anywhere else, I'll take that as a compliment :).

I moved to NYC with my wife right after we were married, and loved every minute of it. But decided to return here to raise our kids after they were born.

An interesting thing about Pittsburgh is the number of large non-profits of every kind, especially considering the reduced population. The major industrial titans that made their fortunes here in decades past (Carnegie, Mellon, Heinz, etc.) have left behind many cultural institutions like libraries, museums, universities, parks, hospitals, etc. that are still well funded and high quality.

You'll find some of that in NYC (even from some of the same benefactors) but Pittsburgh I think has a higher cultural dollars/resident ratio. This is a wonderful thing in terms of raising children. My kids think hanging out at the zoo, library, conservatory, kids' museum, etc. is a perfectly common thing to do. I think in NYC (and other cities?) you could find many of the same things, but it would not be possible to enjoy them in a leisurely manner, or afford family yearly membership passes.

Re:Cities and Ambition by Parenthetical on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @04:00PM (#202543)
I lived in Pgh. for 6 years (7th-12th grade), and my family still lives there. That's a very good point about the cultural institutions -- though in my experience, they're woefully underattended. It's possible to hang out at the zoo, conservatory, science museum, etc. ...but my family was thought to be a bit odd for actually doing so. (Of course, we lived in the wealthy suburban soccer mom part, not the university-intellectual part, so that's probably why. Neighborhoods have messages, too.)
Re:Cities and Ambition by jimbokun on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @04:23PM (#202575)
Heh, that's the advantage of our boys still being young (4 and 6 now, 2 and 4 when we first moved here). They don't know any better than to think those activities are perfectly normal. We have successfully brainwashed them so far, and by the time they hit teenage peer pressure, it might be too late to undo the "damage" of a cultured mind :).

The "under attended" part isn't all bad. Our boys can run around a little bit in Phipps Conservatory, for example, without many negative glances.

We do live in a city neighborhood, so that might account for some of the difference.

Re:Cities and Ambition by rms on Thursday May 29, 2008 @12:22AM (#202971)
And our biggest employer and company is a non-profit! The hulking University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
Re:Cities and Ambition by edw519 on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @01:17AM (#201796)
I've met nice people everywhere I've lived. Somehow, and I'm not sure why, it seems just a little bit easier to meet nice people in Pittsburgh. Whether it's the checkout line in a supermarket, in a restaurant or bar, or just hanging out, people generally seem friendly and engaging.

(The day after a Steeler's loss, of course, all bets are off.)

Re:Cities and Ambition by dimitry on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @02:13AM (#201832)
Agreed. After ~9 years in Pittsburgh, I can definitely confirm the 'nice' factor ;)

Perhaps it's even more noticeable because I live in SF now, especially in the Marina filled with mostly pretentious folks.

Re:Cities and Ambition by hugh on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @07:09PM (#201534)
Places I've lived:

Sydney: You should spend more money on real estate.

Melbourne: You should spend more money on clothes.

London: You should have been here 150 years ago.

Davis, CA: You should leave Davis, CA.

Re:Cities and Ambition by menloparkbum on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @09:46PM (#201669)
my list:

brooklyn: you should be hipper

cambridge: you should be smarter

berkeley: you should only eat organically grown vegetables

tokyo: you should be japanese

san francisco: you should become as crazy as most everyone else, but not quite as crazy as the homeless people

Re:Cities and Ambition by shiro on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @08:29PM (#201598)
Tokyo, Japan: Doing nothing, even for a minute, is a sin.
Re:Cities and Ambition by fogus on Friday May 30, 2008 @03:52PM (#204800)
Having spent some time in Tokyo, I must say that the most striking thing for me was that at any moment of the day, the streets are flooded with people going too and fro. It was amazing. -m
Re:Cities and Ambition by janm on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @10:06AM (#202080)
Sydney is real estate, through and through.

London: "You should have been here 150 years ago" is essentially "you should be more aristocratic". I think that signal is strong in London. I have been at dinner with friends who started arguing about how far they had to commute on the tube (as a proxy for social class.) The English pretend to the world that it doesn't matter but it seems to matter deeply to them. This seems to be an English hidden rule; that is how the discussion started.

Re:Cities and Ambition by motoko on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @09:45PM (#201667)
Places I've lived:

Mountain View, CA: We're not the Barrio (any more).

Toledo, OH: We're close to Detroit.

Bowling Green, OH: Attend a real university with your real high school friends!

Columbus, OH: Love Ohio State football (and basketball, if the season's wrong).

Re:Cities and Ambition by imp on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @01:05AM (#201790)
Cleveland, OH: You gotta be tough.
Re:Cities and Ambition by motoko on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @03:52AM (#201880)
My sister, who drives a car worth about $100, had her car window smashed picked clean of her collection of burned CDs in downtown Cleveland.
Re:Cities and Ambition by tomh on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @04:03PM (#202552)
Moscow: You should be rich, or Russian. Preferably both.
Re:Cities and Ambition by thepeople on Thursday May 29, 2008 @05:17AM (#203148)
Wrong. If we were to choose one message for Moscow it should be: "you must be powerfull."

If you are merely rich, your money can be easily taken from you by more powerful person in Moscow.

And if you didn't know, Russian is a second class citizen in Russia.

All in all, one message per city is insufficient. It all depends on the people around you.

Re:Cities and Ambition by jsteele on Wednesday August 06, 2008 @08:22AM (#268396)
You hit the nail on the head: This whole essay is based on a false premise (which nonetheless is strongly believed by PG). Cambridge only seems to be a "smart" town if your social group consists of people associated with MIT, and you're only likely to end up in that social group if you were part of the middle class when you moved there.
Re:Cities and Ambition by helveticaman on Friday June 06, 2008 @12:58PM (#210953)
Why exactly is Moscow expensive? I've never figured this out. Is there a shortage of land, or is it really, really inaccessible from land, or what?
Re:Cities and Ambition by bootload on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @12:31AM (#201775)
"... Melbourne: You should spend more money on clothes ..."

No it's more like...

Melbourne: You live in the sports capital of a sports crazed country. You should go to the footy, the cricket, tennis and don't forget some new duds on cup day.

Re:Cities and Ambition by astrec on Thursday May 29, 2008 @02:27AM (#203063)
You forgot to mention the obligatory beers at each event.
Re:Cities and Ambition by netcan on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @08:29PM (#202786)
Tel Aviv: You should be moving faster. A lot faster. Dublin: Be wittier then smart. Melbourne: I agree. Its a confused message that definitely has to do with sports not clothes.
Re:Cities and Ambition by davidw on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @03:55AM (#201881)
Eugene, Oregon: Hey man, just, you know, hang out and get mellow.

Portland, Oregon: Be alternative just like everyone else.

San Francisco: We're so hip and important.

Padova, Italy: That was a long, hard work week, let's have a drink in the piazza and get a pizza afterwards.

Innsbruck, Austria: ... something in the Tirolean dialect that I completely failed to grasp, involving skiing ...

Re:Cities and Ambition by ojbyrne on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @06:43PM (#201505)
I've been to different places in the world but the same ideas popped into my head:

Barcelona: Party naked but watch your backpack.

Toronto: Buy land north of here.

Amsterdam: There's no work done here at all.

London: Next time, bring more money.

Re:Cities and Ambition by danw on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @09:42PM (#201663)
I must admit the descriptions you give for Amsterdam, London, Barcelona sound off to me. I think you have to live or spend a lot of time somewhere before you can understand it's 'message', if it has one
Re:Cities and Ambition by ojbyrne on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @11:04PM (#201733)
Um, I was actually picking cities I've lived in or spent a lot of time in. Yes I was being flippant, I don't think I was being completely ignorant.
Re:Cities and Ambition by izaidi on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @09:47PM (#201671)
What would you say those cities' messages are? (I'm especially interested in Amsterdam because I'm thinking about moving there.)
Re:Cities and Ambition by pfedor on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @01:54AM (#201822)
I lived in Amsterdam for half a year ten years ago. It's very walkable and beautiful. You walk the streets and people smile at you. It's a happy place. I think the message is something like, "Be happy."

Also, I believe it's the only country in Europe except for the UK where everyone speaks good English. In most big cities in Europe you will eventually find someone who speaks English, but in Amsterdam the odds that it will be the first person you approach are no worse than in London or California.

Re:Cities and Ambition by spazmaster on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @05:36AM (#201922)
"be happy" eh? there is no correlation between legal pot and happy smiling people. none whatsoever.
Re:Cities and Ambition by hassy on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @02:36PM (#202429)
> Also, I believe it's the only country in Europe except for the UK where everyone speaks good English. In most big cities in Europe you will eventually find someone who speaks English, but in Amsterdam the odds that it will be the first person you approach are no worse than in London or California.

Stockholm is similar -- most people speak good English.

Amsterdam is one of the biggest tourist destinations in Europe, no wonder about the quality of their English (although this applies to the whole of Netherlands, not just Amsterdam).

I hear the Danes speak excellent English too, but I haven't been to Denmark myself.

Re:Cities and Ambition by tyg on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @02:45PM (#202443)
As I understand it, the reason the Dutch speak English so well is that a lot of American television is shown there...still in English, but with Dutch subtitles. So kids grow up essentially in a semi-immersion program of English as a second language, which gets reinforced later in life due to tourism and English being the current effectively most common language.
Re:Cities and Ambition by davidw on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @03:47AM (#201878)
I remember dialing a wrong number in Amsterdam a number of years ago, and the woman responded, in nearly perfect English, without missing a beat. I was impressed.
Re:Cities and Ambition by spazmaster on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @05:39AM (#201923)
on a serious note, I would say Amsterdam's message is 'be more creative' (or 'be creative').
Re:Cities and Ambition by Mistone on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @03:52PM (#202534)
london "bring more money" - is spot on - damm that city is pricey.
Re:Cities and Ambition by iamelgringo on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @07:44PM (#201568)
San Jose, Costa Rica: Spend more time with family

Minneapolis: You should be nice

Providence, RI: You will eat well.

LA: You should look better or be more famous, preferably both.

Chicago: You went to the wrong fraternity

Re:Cities and Ambition by martythemaniak on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @09:20PM (#201648)
Sofia, BG: You should be involved in some kind of shady dealings.
Re:Cities and Ambition by ntoshev on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @03:48AM (#201879)
It is a very clear signal indeed, thank you for summarizing it well.
Re:Cities and Ambition by stranger on Thursday May 29, 2008 @05:45PM (#203746)
That's the origin of power and wealth in bg - very, very sad!
Re:Cities and Ambition by ken on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @09:15PM (#201645)
I think Seattle is telling me "Get some tattoos and piercings and start smoking", but so far I have resisted.
Re:Cities and Ambition by msg on Tuesday May 27, 2008 @10:53PM (#201725)
Seattle: You should be unique.

Logan, UT: You should be one of us.

Denver, CO: You should be healthier.

Re:Cities and Ambition by pchristensen on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @01:59PM (#202382)
Provo, UT: You're still single?

Chicago: There's nothing wrong with second place.

Stockholm, Sweden: You're not clean enough!

Re:Cities and Ambition by steveplace on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @08:49AM (#202004)
I'll play the game, too, but with only two observations:

Orlando, FL: Subprime.

Space Coast, FL: God's Waiting Room

Re:Cities and Ambition by JesseAldridge on Wednesday May 28, 2008 @02:29PM (#202420)
Austin, TX: You should be having more fun on the weekends.

Rio Grande Valley, TX: Play your cards right and some day you could be middle class!

Re:Cities and Ambition by j5xd on Thursday November 20, 2008 @08:27PM (#371358)
Bloomington, IL: Don't be afraid of medocrity

Terre Haute, IN: South side of Chicago, without the rest of it.

Re:Cities and Ambition by bryarcanium on Thursday May 29, 2008 @07:30PM (#203844)
Cincinnati, OH: Learn an instrument.

San Antonio, TX: To the newly minted soldiers/airmen/sailors/marines- welcome back to the real world!

Las Vegas, NV: Be at least 21 and on vacation.