News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by hammock on Thursday May 02, 2019 @04:29PM (#19812502)
I've posted this before but in my family we play serious Scrabble but with house rules that improve the game.

Rule 1: On your turn, but before playing your word, any letter in your hand may be swapped with any letter on the board, as long as the swap makes a valid word (some people already do this with blanks, we do it with any letter). Swap one letter at a time, as many times as you like. No points are scored for swaps, just for playing your word.

Rule 2: Dictionary may be consulted at any time to look up a specific word - however you cannot "leaf" or browse through it. Dictionary priority goes to whoever's turn it is.

The net result of this variation is that

a) the board remains MUCH more open the whole game - there are many more places to play, and the words played are more likely to be bingos or longer words, which in turn open the baord up even more. Often under official rules you get three or four letter words that just close down the future play possibilities.

b) high-point letters which usually are "luck of the draw" like Q and Z, now become skillful, since they will be reused by many players throughout the game

c) turns can take 5-10 minutes at a time :)

Source: my grandmother, who played these rules with the inventor of Scrabble back in college, before he had sold the game for mass distribution (they changed his rules to simplify them)

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by Someone on Thursday May 02, 2019 @04:59PM (#19812849)
”the board remains MUCH more open the whole game”

I think that’s a sign of suboptimal play. The goal isn’t to score as many points as possible, it’s to score more points than your opponent. Opening up a line towards a triple-later or even triple-word square only is worth it if your word scores really high.

Also, there often are high-scoring moves that ‘weave’ new words inside the existing grid. An extreme example is adding the o’s in an existing grid of x’es:

   xxxxx
   ooxoox
     xxxxx
        x
(That’s one reason competitive players have to know the full sets of two- and three letter words)

Even if such a move scores 20-ish points less than your points-wise optimal move, it may be the better choice.

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by frosted-flakes on Thursday May 02, 2019 @05:14PM (#19813020)
Unless you're playing competitively, the goal is also to have fun, and games are much more enjoyable when there's room to expand and you're not forced to place sub-optimal words.
Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by newen on Friday May 03, 2019 @07:59AM (#19817571)
The goal in Scrabble is to crush your friends and hear their lamentations as I get double words scores while blocking their potential expansions. It is not this fun thing that people keep talking about.
Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by hammock on Thursday May 02, 2019 @05:20PM (#19813085)
"Bricking" the board by packing in words next to each other to add to your score commonly happens under our variation - although non-contiguous plays are rare.

And I will still avoid opening up a triple-word square if I can - or cover up an open triple-word just to prevent my opponent from using it. Although it's worth pointing out that under our variation, triple-words - while still very valuable - aren't the end of the world since we'll be playing bingos all over the board the whole game, there's really no need to fight for pink squares.

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by Sebguer on Thursday May 02, 2019 @08:44PM (#19814454)
This article is a great extension of your point here: https://meeplelikeus.co.uk/scrabble-1948/
Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by frosted-flakes on Thursday May 02, 2019 @05:11PM (#19812978)
All three of your rules (swap blanks, swap single letters, and allow consulting the dictionary) are listed as official alternative rules in my Scrabble rule book[0]. We've always allowed use of the dictionary (as a new immigrant from northern Europe, it was one of the ways my grandpa learned English), but we just talked about adopting the letter-swapping rules the next time we play.

[0] I have my late grandpa's "deluxe turntable" version from the 1970s, before it was owned by Hasbro, and my folks have an almost identical one from the 1980s (Hasbro-branded). I believe both rule books have these alternative/house rules.

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by jolmg on Thursday May 02, 2019 @04:46PM (#19812694)
On your Rule 1, do I understand that you can swap any number of letters on your turn before playing your word but with every 1-letter swap, the words need to remain valid? It's not good enough if you need to swap multiple letters before getting to a different valid word?
Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by hammock on Thursday May 02, 2019 @05:24PM (#19813116)
Correct. The goal is not really to change the words on the board, but rather to get better letters into your hand.

Think of it as "I would have a full word if only I could get [X letter]." You see [X letter] on the board, and you want it. You might have to do a chain of one-letter-at-a-time swaps though to get it. And each swap has to make a new valid word. But once you get it, you can play your bingo.

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by frogpelt on Thursday May 02, 2019 @04:35PM (#19812600)
How are Q and Z getting reused so much? There can't be that many times they can be replaced with another letter can there?

Also, after I saw how many "words" are in the Scrabble dictionary I realized that Scrabble was not a vocabulary/spelling competition like I thought when I first played. Some of those "words" are a joke, a few are mentioned in the article (eeew being one example).

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by mxwsn on Thursday May 02, 2019 @04:52PM (#19812759)
"For living-room players, Scrabble is about language, a test of vocabularies. For world-class players, it’s about cold memorization and mathematical probabilities. Think of the dictionary not as a compendium of the beauty and complexity of the English language, but rather as a giant rulebook. Words exist merely as valid strings with which to score points.

A Scrabble board after two top players are finished playing on it might look, to the uninitiated, as though they had played in Martian. Here’s a taste: In a single game in last year’s Nationals, Richards played the following words: zarf (a metal holder for a coffee cup), waddy (to strike with a thick club), hulloed (to hallo, to shout), sajous (a capuchin, a monkey), qi (the vital force in Chinese thought), flyboats (a small, fast boat), trigo (wheat) and threaper (one that threaps, disputes).

Top players tend not to be novelists or poets, but more often computer programmers or mathematicians."

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-makes-nigel-richar...

Sidenote on replacing Q and Z: "Qi" and "Za" are common and useful ways of using q/z which also readily support replacement. In my experience, this is the first "rules change" that one encounters when going from casual Scrabble/Bananagrams/etc to something slightly more competitive. Enabling or disabling these two two-letter words in particular has a huge impact on the game.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-qi-and-za-changed-s...

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by hammock on Thursday May 02, 2019 @05:32PM (#19813184)
>How are Q and Z getting reused so much?

The two- and three-letter words you can make like AX, QI, XI, ZA, QAT, ZOO, and ZOA get used quite a bit. All of these words can have their high-point letter swapped out for something else to free it up again. Sometimes the Q, X, or Z does get locked up on the board for the rest of the game. But if it's not, it's often worth your effort to try to get it back into your hand and use it again.

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by Zanni on Friday May 03, 2019 @06:51AM (#19817192)
quiz -> quit -> suit recycles q and z.
Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by MagicPropmaker on Thursday May 02, 2019 @07:07PM (#19813847)
This eliminates a lot of strategy where you try to "block" an opponent from making a bingo, and moves based on knowing what letters are left.
Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by hammock on Friday May 03, 2019 @08:33AM (#19817808)
We definitely still keep track of not only what letters are left in the bag, but what letters are in others' hands - since you can watch them pick them up from the board.
Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by MagicPropmaker on Thursday May 02, 2019 @07:52PM (#19814185)
> Source: my grandmother, who played these rules with the inventor of Scrabble back in college, before he had sold the game for mass distribution (they changed his rules to simplify them)

The inventor of Scrabble graduated college in 1924. He conceived of and developed the game in the late 30s while he was working full-time as an architect. He didn't start producing the games 'til after WW II, in 1948. He sold the rights in 1952.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Mosher_Butts

I'd love to hear more about how your Grandmother who must have been born no later than 1905 played Scrabble in college with Alfred Butts.

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by tedunangst on Thursday May 02, 2019 @07:59PM (#19814226)
Parent didn't claim Butts was in college at the time.

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/10/01/nyregion/neighborhood-rep...

> He collected accounts from some original players, like members of the Jackson Heights Woman's College Club.

Re:Scrabble rule change allows use of 'OK' by muteh on Thursday May 02, 2019 @08:48PM (#19814477)
I mean I'd love to hear the story as well, but clearly for different reasons.