News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by manigandham on Sunday April 07, 2019 @07:11PM (#19600563)
They don't have to. They're busy serving customers who pay lots of money to have their problems solved, not to pontificate about the morality of building with open-source software.

You're free to set your project's license to whatever you want but why complain when it's used the way you said it can be?

Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by michael_storm on Sunday April 07, 2019 @07:26PM (#19600635)
I expect more of companies and people than their minimum legal obligations.
Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by rsync on Sunday April 07, 2019 @08:56PM (#19601067)
"I expect more of companies and people than their minimum legal obligations."

That's weird ... what do you expect from, say, hammers and blenders ?

I expect people to do nice things and be kind and think of my interests. Simple tools, on the other hand (like screwdrivers and shovels and LLCs and Corporations and family trusts) should just do exactly what they are designed to do - and nothing more.

Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by FakeComments on Sunday April 07, 2019 @10:21PM (#19601438)
It’s strange to me you excuse groups of people from having the same obligations as a lone person.
Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by manigandham on Sunday April 07, 2019 @10:46PM (#19601541)
They're not obligations, they're just subjectives wishes. If you want to make it a requirement then that's what the license is for.
Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by paulryanrogers on Sunday April 07, 2019 @10:29PM (#19601474)
Fair point. Still, even corporate entities are made up of flesh-and-blood humans. So if those humans benefit substantially more than the original creators of a work then it's reasonable to expect those founders to change their license or stop contributing.

So it's possible that well-funded consumer/producers like Amazon may at times crush, overtake, or otherwise discourage some of the unpaid labor that they benefit from.

(Not trying to make a moral argument. Personally I'm a bit conflicted on consuming and producing FOSS.)

Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by manigandham on Sunday April 07, 2019 @08:30PM (#19600946)
That's great but others don't. That's why we have legal definitions, so that we can define clear and objective requirements.
Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by plants on Sunday April 07, 2019 @08:00PM (#19600804)
It's reasonable to expect that of people, but why of companies? Isn't a company like Amazon's moral compass guided solely by legal obligations?
Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by eropple on Sunday April 07, 2019 @08:13PM (#19600865)
You are probably right in the sense of what-is, that Amazon's moral compass is guided only by legal obligations. That does not make it what-should-be. Companies are groups of people. Decency is not erased when a corporation enters the picture.

Corporations exist for the benefit of the society that grants them their charter and that charter can--and should--be revoked when the corporation acts against the best interests of that society. We do have that power, but we've forgotten about it.

Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by chillfox on Sunday April 07, 2019 @08:46PM (#19601022)
Companies are just a group of people. Companies don't do anything, people do and then use companies to try and shield themselves from blame.
Re:AWS Mesh Generally Available by sanatgersappa on Sunday April 07, 2019 @10:57PM (#19601576)
Expectation is the mother of all disappointments.