Re:Finnish breaks natural language processors
by emilfihlman on Friday March 01, 2019 @08:10AM
(#19280192)
Finnish is pronounced extremely regularly. The way it's written is the way it's pronounced (in almost all cases).
Re:Finnish breaks natural language processors
by gorbachev on Friday March 01, 2019 @07:22AM
(#19279870)
No, there is no variation on pronunciation. They sound exactly the same when spoken.
The only way to infer what's meant is from context.
Re:Finnish breaks natural language processors
by simonh on Friday March 01, 2019 @09:08AM
(#19280695)
My favourite homophone example is a 92 character poem in Chinese[0], where every syllable is a slight variation on Shi.
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_...
Interestingly when I showed the actual text to my wife, who is Chinese, she didn't understand what was funny about it until I asked her to read it to me, when she burst out laughing. That's when I found out she doesn't sub-vocalise, where I do all the time.
Re:Finnish breaks natural language processors
by apendleton on Friday March 01, 2019 @11:13AM
(#19282026)
These aren't really homophones though, right? Because they differ in tone?
Re:Finnish breaks natural language processors
by yorwba on Friday March 01, 2019 @11:30AM
(#19282274)
There are only 4 different tones, so by the pigeonhole principle there must be lots of homophones.
On the other hand, most of the characters used to be pronounced differently when they were still commonly used as individual words, so the poem only works because it mixes modern pronunciation with classical grammar.
Can we get a bit more detail here? Are those variations on pronunciation? How does a native Finn able to infer the correct meaning?