This could be made much more accessible by just including appropriate captions, and doing so would benefit a large part of the community.
As far as I can see all the people are more or less drawn anatomically correct and IMO it looks good.
Have you ever seen something drawn by an infant ?
The people/illustrations are pretty good, and wouldn't be out of the ordinary accompanying regular text.
This would make a lot more sense if this was at all what kindergarten handwriting looks like.
As it was, trying to read the handwriting was definitely annoying.
I thought maybe since there's no descriptive text alongside images, that there was probably something in the alt tags. However, the alt tags for each image are just empty quotes. For all intents and purposes this is just a blank page for anyone using a screen reader.
Hey everyone, use descriptive alt tags for your images. It takes 10 seconds and makes a big difference.
Maybe an attempt should have been made to do the story justice then. Discuss where these plastic things came from, who got the idea and when? How did their use spread? And the story doesn't even contain any hint of environmental criticism.
It's an incredibly weak article, and you can tell the editors knew that because of the vague headline they created for it, meant to make people curious. If the headline said "The $0.006 'Plastic Grass' in Your Sushi Container Is Doing an Important Job" far fewer people would have clicked on the article because 'it keeps food separate' is self-evident to anybody who's ever seen it. Better yet would be "The $0.006 'Plastic Grass' in Your Sushi Container Is For Keeping Food Separate." The brief digression into the original bamboo leaf form was slightly interesting, but this article should have gone much deeper to justify itself.