There should be zero expectation of privacy when using a Google service. I've switched to searx.me, which wraps Google and (optionally) a bunch of other search engines.
You’re being really flippant about speculation, which is a total red herring. The point is they’re not honest.
https://multilogin.com/how-canvas-fingerprint-blockers-make-...
Using a minority browser with a lot of stuff blocked makes you very unique.
It's good for blocking 3rd party cookies but you stand out like a sore thumb to Google.
Canvas fingerprinting is highly concerning to say the least, thanks in advance to anyone with working solutions.
Since that's a client side mechanism it should be rather simple to find out, no? (eg. an addon that injects tracking into the DOM accessors necessary to get at the canvas)
In the 2009 post, Google said:
> ...customize search results for you based upon 180 days of search activity linked to an anonymous cookie in your browser... You'll know when we customize results because a "View customizations" link will appear... Clicking the link will let you... turn off this type of customization
None of that appears to be match the study results here. Incognito mode isn't supposed to pick up session cookies from normal browsing, no customization notice appears, and an option to turn the behavior off certainly isn't provided.