If there's anything that would make me buy an iPhone, this is it. I travel a lot between the US and Europe; I'm using Fi at the moment even though I shouldn't actually have access to it. It's mind boggling to me the crazy things we can do with tech today, and not make it all work smoothly and reliably when you step a few meters off the border of whichever country you're in.
While my French phone plan, that I pay $25 a month, gave me unlimited calls and text messages, even in the US, and from France to the US or vice versa. On top of unlimited 4G in my country, I had 25Go of free 3G in the US for my trip. And it was faster than any Wifi I connected to: hotel, work, restaurant...
How is that possible that I was next to Cupertino and Mountain View, yet witnessed this ? This is supposed to be the super tech region of the world, yet it felt nothing like that.
Think about that: ISPs in the US are so firmly entrenched, so highly organized and with such strong lobbies that even in the Bay Area it’s awful.
I want to believe that this will change, but I’ll bwlieve it when I see it. Google tried, and it looks like they’re scaling down their expectations for G Fiber rollouts. Wireless likely can’t work without some quantum leap in the tech, and the infra costs for a buildout are MASSIVE (on the order of tens-hundreds of billions for a nation wide network) plus you need permits for every eyesore tower that every city will individually fight you on. These are just some of the reasons that all the people and all the money in the valley can’t fix US ISPs.
I also still have 250 mbit/s internet with Comcast for $50 (slow upload though)
Keep in mind that the salary in silicon valley tends to be a lot higher, so those $50 are equivalent to $25 of what I had back in Germany.
That being said: It's true that the competition really doesn't seem to work all that great. It's not completely horrible though. I'm happier than with what I had in Germany.
My plan includes 4G coverage in Mexico and Canada, and 2G coverage in 100+ other markets (with the option to upgrade for 3G and 4G rates in those markets). Looking at [1] it appears the current plans may not offer this for free anymore, but it's still available.
[1] https://www.t-mobile.com/travel-abroad-with-simple-global
Google Fi is $20/month for voice and text, plus a variable $10/month per GB up to 6GB where it caps out at $80/month.
Note that I'm not arguing against you, just wanted to clarify that the t mobile experience is just as seamless as Fi, in case I overcomplicated it.
T-Mobile even supports WiFi calling in the same way as Fi, if you want to enable it (handy for me at work, where I'm in a building built like a bunker that gets close to no reception on any network).
I guess we have different standards here in Europe.
If you can actually get these plans using Apple SIM - it’d be order of magnitude cheaper.
Trying to figure out how to get a prepaid plan with a good amount of data that'll work everywhere in Europe isn't easy. Then there's issues about recharging the plan, and many of them don't accept foreign CCs, so you need to be in the country you purchased it in to buy a voucher from the carrier's store.
I also hadn't found any 'unlimited' data options on a prepaid SIM - they only appear to be on the more expensive contract plans. At least, based on my searches in France, Netherlands, Denmark and Norway.
Most of the prepaid SIMs I saw had heavy restrictions on tethering - can you point me in the right direction?
Their service is amazing + it's completely spoiled me when I end up in Vietnam or another country they don't have coverage and I actually have to get a SIM card.
Such a killer service and I'm surprised more people don't talk about it.
You can buy packages for 4g, but they are ludicrously expensive. As in, so expensive they won’t even show you the prices until you are a customer. If I remember, it was in the order of something like $10 for 100mb
There is definitely a data usage threshold where Fi pricing is worse, but if you spend significant time abroad it is hard to beat.
I've only been to Mexico and Brazil since getting T-Mobile, but in both those cases I didn't have any speed issues with whatever they capped me at.
That said, I just looked and I can buy a 1GB international high speed "Data Pass" for $20, valid for 10 days. I didn't need one for any of my trips, but if that experience is atypical, I could see where Fi would be more attractive.
That said, getting a local sim in foreign countries is nice but sometimes takes an annoying amount of work and passport scans.
Oh, and this is not a premium plan or anything. I pay 7.9EUR for unlimited calls and texts, and 1GB of data.
Probably the best landline system was/is in Germany. The ISDN was a complete digital system beginning from the 80s, having features that are not present in current mobile technologies. Calling was almost instant, probably only matched with VoLTE or SIP in local networks. Deutsche Telekom tried very hard to adapt most of the ISDN features to SIP.
Living in New York and granted a US patent...
Geographically the US is much more expansive than the EU and more robust.
I would not compare infrastructure I would compare the regulations. The telcos created the tech and most likely the laws.
Thankfully time, technology, and consolidation has now reduced that down to 2 (CDMA/LTE - Verizon, Sprint, GSM/LTE, AT&T, T-Mobile). LTE will eventually consolidate that down to 1.
Would you elaborate ?
I am currently traveling in Europe and used the "Orange Holiday Europe" travel SIM which appears to do everything I need it to (tethering, calls to anywhere, etc.) and it "just worked" when I landed.
What alternatives to this would be worth looking into ?
When I fly I have enough on my mind already and I don't want to have to sorry about getting a new sim, changing plans, enabling something, changing numbers, ...
I just want my phone number, data, calls and texts. No fuss. Fi is expensive but gives me peace of mind, I never have to worry about my phone, I know it will work just as well as back home.
The T-Mobile plan has worked fine for me in both Australia and the UK, even for navigation.
Wake me up when it's the other way around :/
It's not quite the entire world, but it might be useful if you travel to the US often.
[1] https://www.bof.nl/press/t-mobile-allowed-to-keep-violating-...
On the other hand, Apple relies heavily on hardware sales for revenue.
Kind of - if you buy monthly plan that’s 2X more expensive (at least in Eastern Europe).
Source: https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/internet-tel...
I'm just using my regular 10€/40GB plan whenever I am abroad and it works fine.
Nothing stops you getting cheap plan from Eastern Europe and use it in west (where cost of operations are higher).
Also, I'm not sure it's that cheaper in the East, I can't really find plans that are significantly cheaper than 40 GB per month for 10 euros.
50 GB in Poland is 100 zloty with Orange for example, so 23 euros.
Does Fi run the carrier? I thought it used existing carriers and just supported seamless transition between them (and wifi). Regardless, the motivation would be to get that market they're missing that doesn't use one of the big 4. Granted Apple has never catered to that market, so not sure why they would now (it'd actually be detrimental to them IMO).
EDIT: Oh, and to the GP's point, seamless international use of your phone is a premium feature that might be valuable to customers. You could easily say "why do ____, they are already considered first class" for any new feature.
Fi's base price[0] is $20/mo + tax. Hallon (my current provider) will sell you 8GB/mo of data for $18/mo, tax included.[1] With Fi that would cost you.. $80/mo + tax. Hallon doesn't actually have anything comparable to that, price-wise; their most expensive plan is 100GB/mo at ~$40.
And no, population density is not an excuse either. According to Wikipedia[2], the US' population density is 33 ppl/km², where Sweden has 23 ppl/km².
Doesn't seem to be the economy either, the GDP per capita seems to within ~20%[3], and that's before taking into account the massive difference in income equality.
I'd love if someone could explain how this price difference is somehow reasonable, because this just boggles my mind completely.
[0]: https://fi.google.com/about/plan/
[1]: https://www.hallon.se/vara-produkter/mobiltelefoni/mobilabon...
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependen...
[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)...
What you are complaining about is the US Cell market, which is awful and has horrible prices compared to the rest of the world.
I usually buy a local sim card for data because it's usually cheaper than Fi per GB. However, I pick a different carrier than what I can access through Fi so I have more reliable access for work (and can use both using Speedify).
Having immediate data on arrival, a backup cell network, up to 10 data sim cards for free and access to my US phone number and it's incoming/outgoing calls via data on Hangouts is a godsend when traveling and working remotely.
And while you can end up paying $80/mo if you use >6GB, you won't pay any more than that even if you use more (though they will start throttling you at 15GB).
Do you find you need to use Speedify and tether often?
On regional differences, I see price differences as usually a combination of charging what they can, who they have to or want to compete against, cost of doing business, and how seriously they take the market. Or put more simply: either they have optimized for most money or they don't care enough.
1gb in Philippines is not even 50 peso. it's $10 USD with fi. 50 peso is $1. Prepaid.
in Japan 6GB pocket wifi is about 1500JPY, prepaid. With Fi, 1gb is $10.
In Malaysia, unlimited unthrottled LTE is $14 USD.
They're profiting like bandits.
I just run up the support and get what I want usually.
Fi created their own arbitrage opportunity out of convenience and brand image.
Their are cheaper plans within the USA for domestic data usage, if that is all you want. That’s not the point of Fi though
But that's hardly a problem anyway since getting a local SIM pays off quickly, Fi or not.
They wouldn't have their UX tied to cell providers, who are some of the most unpleasant entities to interact with. They would probably be able to lean further into their personal security stance, by fully obfuscating the user from the provider.
They have the brand leverage to do it, I'm hoping this is a stepping stone.