News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Regarding the Em Dash by seandougall on Sunday January 07, 2018 @12:19AM (#16089358)
> While we're on this subject, wide spacing between sentence-ending periods and the next sentence is the Right Way (tm).

This convention started with typewriters, and typesetters (e.g. my parents) will tell you that it is only considered correct in monospace fonts. This is also why HTML takes the liberty of reducing whitespace down to a single space character unless you go out of your way to use an  .

Re:Regarding the Em Dash by Dylan16807 on Sunday January 07, 2018 @04:02AM (#16089976)
> typesetters (e.g. my parents) will tell you that it is only considered correct in monospace fonts

People like to say that but it's never been explained to my satisfaction. Spaces are twice as wide in a monospace font. Why would you use more spaces when and only when you have a longer space?

Re:Regarding the Em Dash by alister on Sunday January 07, 2018 @05:22PM (#16093068)
> Why would you use more spaces when and only when you have a longer space?

I've also wondered this. Referring to this mock-up[1], I have the same monospace text with single vs double spaces after sentences, and proportional font with single vs double. The usual argument is that #2 is better than #1 (for mono), but #3 is better than #4 (for proportional). It feels like an inconsistency in the preference, and (as you pointed out) the reasoning doesn't make sense.

[1] https://imgur.com/a/nozuw

Re:Regarding the Em Dash by dragonwriter on Sunday January 07, 2018 @04:19AM (#16090025)
> This convention started with typewriters

No, an em-width space between sentences with either half-em or third-em width space between words was typesettig convention for a long time before typewriters, and is where the triple (later double) spacing in typewritten manuscript convention came from.

Typesetting convention evolved to narrower and eventually mostly settled on equal-to-interword spacing after that typewriter convention evolved from earlier typesetting convention.

Re:Regarding the Em Dash by WovenTales on Sunday January 07, 2018 @11:40AM (#16091410)
There's an article I keep in my bookmarks for times like this: http://www.heracliteanriver.com/?p=324

In short, wider sentence spacing goes back to the first English standards of the eighteenth century – including the first nine editions of the Chicago Manual of Style, and even the tenth still had it as an en-space – and only really started falling out of favour in the twenties. Typewriters had limited effect, but the automated typesetters that suceeded them were actually what killed it off, to simplify the programming.

I typically do still type a single space, but I take full advantage of my preferred TeX flavour's (ConTeXt) automatic conversion to wider spaces. One successful, post-education convert here!

Re:Regarding the Em Dash by gnicholas on Sunday January 07, 2018 @01:04AM (#16089523)
But what of sentences that end with an abbreviation that ends in a period, like "U.S."? If it's just one space after a period, it's impossible to know that the sentence has ended? I realize in books or published articles this can be typeset in a smart way to make it distinguishable, but what about in ordinary writing?
Re:Regarding the Em Dash by cryptonector on Sunday January 07, 2018 @01:29AM (#16089595)
Exactly. "I live in the U.S. I am happy." requires a bit more cognitive work to parse if spaces after sentence-ending periods are not wider.

EDIT: For completeness, here is that same text with an extra space: "I live in the U.S. I am happy." -- see how much easier that is to read? Sure, it's not that big a deal, but it's definitely kind to the reader.

Re:Regarding the Em Dash by function_seven on Sunday January 07, 2018 @02:10AM (#16089705)
Regarding your edit, it appears exactly the same :(. The browser collapses whitespace. I'm not sure if HN's comment system will allow you to double-space after a period, other than in a <pre> block:

    I live in the U.S. I am happy.

    I live in the U.S.  I am happy.
Re:Regarding the Em Dash by cryptonector on Sunday January 07, 2018 @04:03PM (#16092695)
Ay, thanks.
Re:Regarding the Em Dash by Symbiote on Sunday January 07, 2018 @04:23AM (#16090040)
British: I don't live in the US. I am happy.

Full stops aren't generally used in abbreviations here, Mx Cryptonector.

Though there's a more recent trend to write "Nato" rather than NATO, which annoys me for the inconsistency that arises. Plenty of people pronounce VAT as one word, or PAYE, but these are usually left in capitals.

Re:Regarding the Em Dash by dmurray on Sunday January 07, 2018 @07:09AM (#16090552)
Nato (but VAT) has been preferred by the Guardian style guide [0] for a long time. I've never understood it.

[0] https://www.theguardian.com/guardian-observer-style-guide-a

Re:Regarding the Em Dash by auxbuss on Sunday January 07, 2018 @01:10PM (#16091835)
The Guardian also does eg and ie, which, equally, I've never understood.
Re:Regarding the Em Dash by cryptonector on Sunday January 07, 2018 @04:05PM (#16092709)
As Churchill said, we're two cultures separated by a common language.
Re:Regarding the Em Dash by angelsl on Sunday January 07, 2018 @02:18AM (#16089729)
Your double space was collapsed by the browser.
Re:Regarding the Em Dash by anjbe on Sunday January 07, 2018 @04:12AM (#16090006)
In TeX, inter‐sentence spaces are visibly wider than normal spaces, including those that come after abbreviations. And when justifying text, they stretch faster than spaces between words.
Re:Regarding the Em Dash by cryptonector on Sunday January 07, 2018 @01:25AM (#16089579)
Typesetters are wrong then.