Re:U.S. Consumer Bureau Loses Fight to Allow More Class-Acti...
by zimpenfish on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @08:09AM
(#15549363)
> The widespread use of forced arbitration seems ripe for examination by the SCOTUS.
Given the current makeup of SCOTUS, I wouldn't hold your breath, sadly.
(Although I would like to hear Gorsuch claim that since the constitution didn't say anything about forced arbitration, it's out of the purview of SCOTUS. If only to hear him slapped down by RBG again.)
Re:U.S. Consumer Bureau Loses Fight to Allow More Class-Acti...
by kharms on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @09:16AM
(#15549791)
They looked at a related issue not too long ago.
https://www.classdefenseblog.com/2015/12/supreme-court-holds...
Re:U.S. Consumer Bureau Loses Fight to Allow More Class-Acti...
by JackFr on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @10:12AM
(#15550254)
In your view is it ever permissible(enforceable) to forfeit the right to sue as part of a contract? Or are there just certain kinds of contracts or circumstances for which the right to sue is inalienable?
The widespread use of forced arbitration seems ripe for examination by the SCOTUS. I'm no lawyer, but it seems like a fairly blatant violation of the 7th amendment.