News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Most Female and Male Occupations Since 1950 by yung_endian on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @02:20PM (#15241059)
>That seems high to me, from my own experiences.

It's almost as if your own individual experiences are not indicative of population-level trends at large

Re:Most Female and Male Occupations Since 1950 by joenot443 on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @02:46PM (#15241334)
Just a friendly reminder as I noticed you're new - patronising, nonproductive comments like this don't go over as well here as they do on reddit.
Re:Most Female and Male Occupations Since 1950 by screaminghawk on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @04:02PM (#15242051)
I don't think the comment is nonproductive. The majority of "women in tech" issues like this post is referring to, are belittled/misunderstood due to the differences in individual experiences. It's a fair comment to point out at this sometimes works in the reverse as well (i.e. sometimes there are more woman and/or fewer problems).
Re:Most Female and Male Occupations Since 1950 by seizethecheese on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @03:31PM (#15241758)
Your comment is equally patronizing.
Re:Most Female and Male Occupations Since 1950 by shawndumas on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @03:55PM (#15241988)
but it was productive
Re:Most Female and Male Occupations Since 1950 by yung_endian on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @04:41PM (#15242409)
I've been lurking here since it started. It's not patronizing - it's pointing out a basic statistical fact. Has the bar on HN truly fallen so low that pointing out that anecdote != data is now considered rude?
Re:Most Female and Male Occupations Since 1950 by StavrosK on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @08:35PM (#15244017)
"Pointing out" is what you did, "rude" was how you did it.

For example:

"It's almost as if you don't understand that rudeness is about the tone instead of the content".

Or:

"It looks like you're trying to move the goalposts; would you like some help with that?"

Or:

"> 'It's not patronizing - it's pointing out a basic statistical fact' Interesting how you think the two are mutually exclusive."

Etc.

Re:Most Female and Male Occupations Since 1950 by vacri on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @06:09PM (#15243198)
It's really weird that you've been on the site for 10 years and only just now decided to bust forth with a handful of comments of this low quality.
Re:Most Female and Male Occupations Since 1950 by chrshawkes on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @05:44PM (#15243009)
"Has the bar on HN truly fallen so low that pointing out that anecdote != data is now considered rude?"

yes... yes it has :)