News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by mtw on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @05:36PM (#15233056)
This is a life saver for those who spend time outdoors and can't or don't like to carry phones. I run for example for hours in the Canadian winter and the idea of having an emergency phone is attractive, in case I fall, or maybe there's a big issue at home.

Another alternative would be an iPhone SE but sadly we are in the era of oversized phones.

I would also love it to have more Bluetooth integration (continuous glucose monitoring is a good first step), and continuously monitor more health data in general: hydration, temperature. Omron is working on a watch that measures blood pressure. The last step is food intake monitoring but I guess we will need a couple more iterations and more sensors (onboard camera?) to get the Watch record that

Re:Apple Watch 3 by winkywooster on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @06:39PM (#15233625)
I spend hours running outside in the winter, too, and find that electronics of any form are mostly unreliable when it gets cold enough. I run with a Garmin GPS watch, and after several hours of single digit temperatures (F), the watch will often die. Phones don't even last that long. I doubt these will be any better in the same situation.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by photojosh on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @07:32PM (#15234021)
Yep, cold destroys battery capacity. You need to keep the device next to your skin.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by tspike on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @06:55PM (#15233745)
I was relieved to see they are still selling the SE. It's really a fantastic little device and I much prefer the form factor. I don't see a compelling reason to upgrade.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by yitchelle on Wednesday September 13, 2017 @08:16AM (#15237521)
I can't upvote this enough. I mean, if Apple would license their previous incarnations of iPhone to a 3rd party to manufacture and to sell, these "iPhone"s would still sell like hotcakes, especially in non 1st world countries.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by mikeyouse on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @07:33PM (#15234026)
They knocked another $50 off it as well, now starts at $350 - Damn good deal.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by sceew on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @11:10PM (#15235204)
Just got it for $140 on ATT. Bought the subsidized pre-paid version (same phone), but it works for postpaid ATT.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by peterarmstrong on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @05:40PM (#15233099)
No Rogers yet, so this may get people switching to Bell (ugh) or Telus...
Re:Apple Watch 3 by stouset on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @06:34PM (#15233584)
This is also phenomenal for when you're battery-limited. You can turn off one of the two devices and save its battery for if you really, absolutely, must need to make a phone call at some later point in the day.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by perseusprime11 on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @05:56PM (#15233245)
Not just runs, you can also use it to have quality time on date mights without worrying about checking your phone all the time.
Re:Apple Watch 3 by photojosh on Tuesday September 12, 2017 @07:32PM (#15234013)
The new watchOS 4 allows you to connect to (up to 2) Bluetooth LE sensors. That covers your use case.